Before reading this article, please "like" and "follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support, thank you very much!
Someone said so.
The Civil Code should also be amended, the daughter-in-law received the bride price from her in-laws, lived in the house funded by her in-laws, used the car bought by her in-laws, and finally the son and daughter-in-law inherited the real estate of the in-laws, but the Civil Code stipulates that there is no legal obligation to support the in-laws, and logically speaking, they should also be supported, and if they do not support their in-laws, they should not inherit the property of their in-laws, and the property given to their sons is also equivalent to giving them to their daughters-in-law and grandchildren. The same goes for sons-in-law, if the daughter and son-in-law live in the house of their parents (father-in-law and mother-in-law) and inherit their property, the son-in-law should also support the father-in-law and mother-in-law.
At this time, some people talk about the child, but before talking about it, can you think about it carefully, isn't the mother-in-law a girl? Why is it that the son is your own, and the grandson is not the daughter-in-law's! If this is the case, the mother-in-law will lose! The son who was raised with hard work finally earns money to raise other women and her children! Therefore, it is the natural law of mankind and even the whole world that the heirs are continuous, and they are not born to anyone! It is your own responsibility and obligation.
Don't confuse ownership and use. The son is the right of ownership, that is, the parents buy it from the son, and the daughter-in-law is only the right of use, which is only given by the marriage, and when the marriage ends, this gift ends. Because these are the son's pre-marital property. As for the bride price, don't forget that there is also a dowry, usually the two are basically equal.
These people have made the 5,000-year-old culture unpopular, and the next generation has to support the elderly! In this way, it is good for each generation to be good, but the result of not raising them is that the generations will grow old and have no sense of security! Everyone will grow old one day!
Regardless of whether there is a daughter-in-law's name on the real estate certificate, it is an indisputable fact that you can enjoy housing and cars without a penny, until in the end, although the son inherits the property of her in-laws, but the daughter-in-law can enjoy all this without spending a penny and may even inherit her husband's property, which is also an indisputable fact, how can some netizens say that the daughter-in-law did not get a little benefit with a clear conscience?
How much is your property worth? Trapping your son with three people? You are all for your son, one yard is one yard.
One-on-one direct dialogue, the daughter-in-law's interlocutor is the husband, and the grandson's direct interlocutor is the father, each of them should not be made into a pot of porridge.
The function of the house is to live, the daughter-in-law has lived in the house of her in-laws for decades, and the house has been given to the daughter-in-law's children, and she actually said that the house was bought by the in-laws for her son, and the daughter-in-law has no obligation to provide for the in-laws to provide for the elderly.
I think that law is very fair, my friend has been married for more than ten years, and I haven't seen any of the bride price you mentioned above (my friend's parents haven't seen it either, let alone received it) and the house where my friend lives with his husband, whether it's a rental house or a house bought, my in-laws haven't paid a single dollar. The in-laws have never paid a piece of the money for the wedding banquet, and the car is also bought by themselves after marriage. May I ask what you say is wrong with this civil code?
There are still people who oppose such a fair, and the reasons for the opposition are also untenable! The inheritors do not have daughters-in-law and sons-in-law in the first and second order. Maintenance actually corresponds to support, because our parents raised us to grow up, so we support our parents.
The daughter-in-law can't inherit the property of her in-laws, but the son inherits it, and the son's income is shared by the husband and wife. Supporting the in-laws is also because the son and daughter-in-law are two sons and help each other, and the Civil Code is very clear.
#Tell the truth##Article Premiere Challenge#