Due to tensions around the world, foreign policy is front and center in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
The Republican candidate has emphasized a tough stance on China on foreign policy. They believe that the rise of China poses a huge challenge to the United States, not only economically, but also militarily and geopolitically. As a result, they advocate more assertive policies to curb China's influence, including strengthening military alliances and increasing economic sanctions against China. However, there are also divisions within the Republican Party about America's role and responsibilities on the world stage. Some argue that the United States should play a more active leadership role, while others believe that the United States should focus more on domestic issues and less foreign intervention.
There are also divisions within the Republican Party over how to respond to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Some advocate a tougher stance, including direct military assistance to Ukraine, and even consider using military force to stop Russia's aggression. Others, meanwhile, advocate a diplomatic solution to the crisis and avoid a direct conflict with Russia.
On the Democratic side, President Joe Biden has been emphasizing U.S. leadership. He believes that the United States should continue to play the role of defender and leader of the world order and promote the development of global affairs in a more just and balanced direction. And Robert Jr. F. Kennedy and Marianne Williamson, on the other hand, presented themselves as candidates for peace, advocating a diplomatic solution to international disputes rather than the use of force to resolve them.
On China, there are also some differences among the Democratic candidates. Some argue that a tougher stance should be taken to address China's challenge, including tightening economic sanctions on China and expanding military alliances. Others advocate dialogue and cooperation to resolve differences between China and the United States, avoiding confrontational confrontation.
Here's what the leading candidates for the 2024 U.S. presidential election have to say on the issue.
- 乔·拜登(Joe Biden)
Joe Biden, as an American Democrat, has a clear view and position on foreign policy. In his quest for re-election, he stressed his support for Ukraine and said he would help if necessary. He warned that if Russia succeeds in invading Ukraine, then the entire world will face security threats. In addition, Biden's attempt to counter China by strengthening alliances and partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region shows his ambition and strategy in dealing with China.
Despite President Biden's vigorous defense of ending the 20-year U.S. war in Afghanistan, he continues to face criticism for the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. troops in August 2021. The incident has raised questions about U.S. foreign policy and challenged President Biden's leadership. President Biden faces a complex situation and responsibilities in dealing with Afghanistan, and his decisions will have far-reaching implications for America's image and influence around the world.
On the Ukraine issue, President Biden's statement shows the United States' commitment to maintaining international order and regional stability. His remarks send a clear signal to the world: the United States will continue to support its allies and take the necessary steps to counter potential threats. This firm and decisive stance has helped to enhance the influence of the United States in international affairs, while also providing confidence and support to its allies.
In dealing with China, President Biden has taken a series of steps to try to counter China by strengthening alliances and partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region. The move aims to build a unified strategic front line to counter China's growing influence in the region. By working with allies, Biden seeks to form a more solid and entrenched front to address China's economic, security, and geopolitical challenges.
However, President Biden's challenges on Afghanistan have also exposed some of the difficulties and concerns in U.S. foreign policy. As a global superpower, the United States faces complexities and uncertainties in handling international affairs that cannot be ignored. President Biden needs to think hard and develop a more comprehensive and long-term foreign policy to better address current and future challenges.
- 玛丽安·威廉姆森(Marianne Williamson)
Marianne Williamson is a high-profile writer and political figure whose foreign policy views are in the spotlight. Peace and love are at the heart of her political philosophy, and she is committed to creating a more peaceful and friendly international environment. In her 2024 campaign platform, she offers a number of fresh and forward-thinking foreign policy perspectives.
On the one hand, Marianne Williamson promised to create a Ministry of Peace, which would focus on preventing conflict and provide peace building projects. This is fundamentally different from the traditional policy of military intervention, which emphasizes the resolution of international disputes through peaceful means, rather than through military intervention. This view is particularly important in today's world and has attracted a lot of attention and discussion.
On the other hand, on the issue of Ukraine, Williamson believes that there are "legitimate reasons" for Western allies, including the United States, to provide military assistance. She was open to military intervention in specific situations, but stressed that it was not the only means of resolving international disputes. She advocated a diplomatic approach to finding a solution and avoiding the use of force where possible.
In addition, Williamson criticized the behavior of the US government in Latin America, where she argued that there are "imperialist" and "paternalistic" practices in the region. This view reflects her critical attitude towards some of the problems in American foreign policy, as well as her concern and concern for the Latin American region.
In general, Marianne Williamson's foreign policy views are imbued with humanism and a desire for peace. She hoped to promote harmony and friendship in the international community through the establishment of the Ministry of Peace and the promotion of peace building projects, while also stressing the importance of diplomacy in resolving international disputes. Her views have attracted a lot of attention and discussion, and they have also provided people with a new perspective for thinking.
- 小罗伯特· F·肯尼迪(Robert F. Kennedy Jr.)
Robert Jr. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He is a high-profile independent candidate with a unique and compelling perspective on U.S. foreign policy. In the current international situation, his views have attracted much attention and have also sparked extensive discussions and controversies.
Kennedy was strongly opposed to U.S. support for Ukraine against Russia. He bluntly noted that the US position on Ukraine not only lacks evidence, but could lead to a more complex regional situation. He believes that the West deliberately sabotaged the peace talks between Russia and Ukraine in the spring of 2022, a point that has caused widespread controversy. Kennedy even claimed that the United States wanted to overthrow Russia's authoritarian president, Vladimir Putin, a statement that caused an uproar.
Even more striking is that Kennedy offers his own unique perspective on the roots of the current war. He does not consider the war unprovoked, but attributes it to the expansion of NATO in the 90s of the last century and in the first decade of this century. This view has been strongly opposed by major politicians from both parties and US military leaders, but it has also resonated with some. His views provoked deep reflections on international relations and geopolitics.
In addition, Kennedy described the United States as a "belligerent imperialist nation" and called on the United States to abandon imperialism and instead serve peace. His belief that "it is not too late for us to voluntarily abandon the empire and turn to the service of peace" has sparked widespread discussion in the United States and abroad. Kennedy's views challenged conventional notions of foreign policy and provoked reflections on America's future role.
Overall, Robert Jr. F. Kennedy had a clear and avant-garde view of American foreign policy, and his remarks sparked widespread discussion and controversy. For or against, Kennedy's views deserve deep consideration. In the current international situation, being able to listen to different voices and carry out in-depth discussions may be able to provide new ideas and directions for solving complex international issues.
- 唐纳德·特朗普（Donald Trump）
Donald Trump has always had a unique view of U.S. foreign policy, and his statements on a number of international issues have sparked widespread attention and controversy. Trump has claimed that he has the power to end the war between the two countries in just 24 hours by having the leaders of Ukraine and Russia meet. This statement has raised questions and discussions from the outside world, because the conflict between Ukraine and Russia is rooted in complex historical and geopolitical factors and cannot be easily resolved.
When it comes to the Taiwan Strait, Mr. Trump has refused to give a clear answer on whether he will send U.S. troops to support Taiwan, saying such an answer would put him in a very disadvantageous negotiating position. This position is consistent with Washington's long-standing "strategic ambiguity" on Taiwan's defense issue, but it has also raised concerns about Trump's attitude and stance on Taiwan. Mr. Trump then turned to accusing Taiwan of profiting from the U.S. semiconductor industry, saying that "all of our chips used to be made in-house, and now 90 percent of our chips are made in Taiwan...... Remember, Taiwan took away our business - they took away our business. ”
And Trump's foreign policy stance as president of the United States has often been questioned. The foreign policy of the Trump administration emphasized "America First" and adopted a series of measures that deviated from traditional foreign policy, such as withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal, and adopting a protectionist stance on trade policy.
- 罗恩·德桑蒂斯(Ron DeSantis)
Ron DeSantis is the governor of Florida who has his own unique perspective on U.S. foreign policy. He has often emphasized the need for the United States to demonstrate strength to deter China and sees China as the greatest foreign policy threat to the United States. He has also often pointed the finger at China when dealing with the war in Ukraine.
During the Republican Party's first presidential primary debate, DeSantis said that he would not increase aid to Ukraine, believing that "Europe needs to strengthen aid." He has called Russia's invasion of Ukraine a "territorial dispute," a remark that has been strongly criticized in Washington. Later, however, he retracted his claim and said he had been misunderstood.
In addition to his views on China and Ukraine, DeSantis has pledged to be the most pro-Israel president. Earlier this year, he visited Israel and met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Herzog. It can be seen that DeSantis has his own unique views on foreign policy issues such as China, Ukraine and Israel.
Overall, Ron DeSantis emphasized his vigilance against China in foreign policy, believing that China is the greatest foreign policy threat to the United States. He has taken a more conservative stance on the war in Ukraine and has tended to step up aid to Europe. At the same time, he also expressed his support and friendly attitude towards Israel. These positions and views will likely influence his future speeches and decisions in U.S. foreign policy.
- 妮基·黑利(Nikki Haley)
Nikki Haley is a high-profile politician whose views on U.S. foreign policy are in the spotlight. As a former UN ambassador, she has been citing her own experiences throughout the campaign, making some compelling claims.
During her campaign, Nikki Haley took a hard line on China and urged Congress to end normal trade relations with China if fentanyl traffic did not abate. She also criticized Trump and Biden's performance on China, showing her dissatisfaction with the current administration's foreign policy.
Nikki Haley, in defending continued aid to Ukraine, has often emphasized that "a Russian victory is a Chinese victory." Such baseless accusations show her distorted understanding of the relationship between Russia and China, as well as her distorted support for the Ukraine issue.
On the Taiwan Strait issue, Nikki Haley called China the biggest threat to the United States and promised that the United States would support Taiwan. This stance shows her fear of the challenges posed by China's rise and her overly "concern" about the Taiwan Strait.
- 维韦克·拉马斯瓦米（Vivek Ramaswamy）
Vivek Ramaswamy's views on U.S. foreign policy have sparked widespread attention and discussion. As a businessman and commentator, Ramaswamy offers his own unique perspectives and recommendations on U.S. interests and national security issues.
Ramaswamy said he would put U.S. interests first, which meant he would deviate from the Republican Party's consistent line and advocate for less interference in foreign affairs. He believes that the United States should pay more attention to domestic problems and concentrate its resources and energy on domestic construction and reform, rather than intervening too much in the affairs of other countries.
However, despite advocating less interference in foreign affairs, Ramaswamy also said he would continue to provide financial assistance to Israel. He stressed that he will support Israel until the country's leader, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, says that assistance is no longer needed. This stance shows the importance that Ramaswamy attaches to supporting allies and maintaining U.S. influence in the Middle East.
Separately, Ramaswamy also said that he would stop aid to Ukraine and would never allow Ukraine to join NATO. He believes that doing so could force Russia to make concessions in order to end the war in Ukraine. This position has caused some controversy, with some arguing that it could weaken U.S. influence in the European region, while others see it as an effective means of putting pressure on Russia.
In addition, Ramaswamy also promised to protect Taiwan from a "potential invasion" until the United States achieves "semiconductor independence." However, this statement has caused widespread controversy in the international community and has also aggravated the destabilizing factors in the Taiwan Strait.
Despite this, Ramaswamy said that he would be a peaceful president and would only wage war against the federal government. This statement shows his pursuit of peace and stability, as well as the importance he attaches to avoiding unnecessary conflicts and wars.