The article published by netizen "X Squid Said" on the headline platform "After Attending the Funeral of Marshal Chen Yi, Song Qingling sighed: Chairman Mao is really smart!" is an article full of loopholes, and even serious disrespect and disrespect for revolutionary leaders, a short article of more than 2,000 words, and dozens of errors. As a Chinese, we really cannot tolerate such acts that insult the leaders of the Chinese revolution.
First of all, let's see what is mainly wrong with this article!
The main mistake lies in the definition of Marshal Chen Yi's position in the history of the Chinese revolution.
Please see the original article:
"It can be said that General Chen Yi has made a lot of contributions to China's revolutionary cause throughout his military career, and he is also an important leader of our army. ”
Let's not say that there is a serious language problem in this sentence, but just talk about his evaluation of Marshal Chen Yi's position in revolutionary history. In his eyes, Marshal Chen Yi only made "a lot of contributions" to the cause of the Chinese revolution. Let's see what the Party Central Committee says about Marshal Chen Yi: Chen Yi is one of the founders and leaders of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, a great proletarian revolutionary, military strategist, and diplomat. The key word here is "great proletarian revolutionary", is it true that a "great revolutionary" has only made "a lot of contributions" to the cause of the Chinese revolution? Generally speaking, when commenting on such a revolutionary leader, you use the words "outstanding, enormous, and major contributions", so is it appropriate for you to apply "many contributions" to a great revolutionary?
In addition, there are many errors in this article, and there are dozens of general calculations. Here are a few examples, which can be seen.
1. Please see the original text: "In the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China, General Chen Yi led his troops to fight on the battlefield many times. After the founding of the People's Republic of China, Chen Yi held important positions in our army and trained batch after batch of military talents. There are two mistakes in this sentence: First, it is said that in the early days of the founding of New China, Marshal Chen Yi led his troops to fight on the battlefield many times, but the actual situation is that in the early days of the founding of New China, the country did not have many wars, and in particular, Marshal Chen Yi mainly served as the mayor of Shanghai from 1949 to 1954 In the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China, Marshal Chen Yi basically left the army and served as mayor of Shanghai and vice premier of the State Council.
2. Please see the original text: "In 1972, Mr. Chen died of illness. Soong Ching-ling, Chairman Mao and other revolutionaries also attended Chen Yi's funeral. There are at least the following errors in this sentence: First, calling Comrade Chen Yi "Mr. Chen" is disrespectful to the revolutionary leader. The article "X Squid Said" refers to Comrade Chen Yi as "Mr. Chen" throughout the article, and under normal circumstances, as a Chinese, he generally calls revolutionary leaders their positions or comrades, but "X Squid Says" actually calls Marshal Chen Yi "Mr." This is a serious disrespect to revolutionary leaders. Second, it is inappropriate to call Marshal Chen Yi "deceased", it should be deceased. Third, it is said that "Song Qingling, Chairman Mao and other revolutionaries also attended Chen Yi's funeral", first of all, the order is incorrect, it should be "Chairman Mao, Song Qingling, etc." In addition, it is not right to call Chairman Mao, Soong Ching-ling, and others "revolutionaries," especially Chairman Mao, Premier Zhou, and so on, who are the great leaders of the Chinese people, and it is very inappropriate to call them "revolutionaries."
3. Please see the original text: "After the death of General Chen Yi, many well-known figures inside and outside the party came to express their condolences. There are two mistakes in this sentence, one is that it is inappropriate to call Chen Yi a "general", Chen Yi is a marshal, and there is a difference between him and a general. Second, it is wrong to say that "many well-known figures inside and outside the party have come to express their condolences"; in fact, those who attended the memorial service for Marshal Chen Yi were members and alternate members of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee in Beijing, especially Chairman Mao, Premier Zhou, Soong Ching-ling, and other important leaders who attended the memorial service.
4, please see the original text: "The relationship between Song Qingling and Chen Yi is also very good, it can be said that they don't know each other." It is seriously inappropriate to say that Chen Yi and Song Qingling are "not acquaintances if they don't fight". The background of this sentence is that after the Third Field Army led by Comrade Chen Yi was stationed in Shanghai, the soldiers stopped Ms. Soong Ching-ling's car to go home because they did not know it. How can this be called "no fighting, no acquaintance"? Who hit whom? Is that how it is described?
5. Please see the original text: "Chen Yi's dedication to our army and the party over the years is also obvious to all. The death of such a revolutionary hero cannot but be saddened. There are two mistakes in this sentence: First, it is inappropriate to say that Comrade Chen Yi is "a "dedication" to our party and our army, but at least a contribution. Second, it is inappropriate to call Comrade Chen Yi a "revolutionary hero". Comrade Chen Yi is a great proletarian revolutionary and one of the ten marshals, how can he be summed up as a "revolutionary hero"? Especially when it comes to the memorial service, which is the final affirmation of the life of a revolutionary.
6. The picture is wrong. Take a look:
The picture that should be accompanied here is the portrait of Marshal Chen Yi, but the picture is definitely not Marshal Chen Yi. Even if it can be accompanied by someone else's picture, it should not be accompanied by a portrait of a military cap with a Kuomintang cockade on it. No wonder some people commented: "Be careful, General Chen Yi? Who is the photo?"
In short, the article is full of errors and too many to mention. Moreover, the consequences are severe.
First, it reflects the author's disrespect for the revolutionary leader. Second, it reflects the author's ignorance and lack of knowledge about the history of the party and the military. Third, it reflects that the author's tone is too loud and no one is in his eyes, which shows that he is of bad character, and imagine who else can be seen in the eyes of a revolutionary leader who dares to make such a presumptuous comment? When I read this article, I not only had such a thought, but also how sacred is this, and who dares to say so much. Do you speak human language?