Recently, Liu Shiwen and Zhang Jike, two top players of the Chinese table tennis team, have once again become the focus of media attention. Liu Shiwen made headlines for wearing a Dior wool jacket worth 60,000 yuan, while Zhang Jike sparked widespread controversy over the news of his monthly salary of 30,000 yuan.
Regarding Liu Shiwen's jacket door, many netizens expressed their dissatisfaction. Some people believe that as an internationally renowned professional athlete, Liu Shiwen should pay more attention to the low-key and pragmatic image, and should not pursue luxury excessively. Some people have a different view on this, believing that Liu Shiwen has the right to consume according to her preferences and financial ability, and should not be overly criticized by the outside world.
At the same time, Zhang Jike's monthly salary of 30,000 yuan has also caused a lot of discussions. As a legend in the table tennis world, the news of Zhang Jike's return to the professional table tennis arena with a high salary has made people question the treatment of professional athletes. While some people believe that professional athletes should be rewarded for their hard work due to their special status and hard work, others worry that the income gap in professional sports is too obvious and may affect the harmonious development of society.
Liu Shiwen and Zhang Jike, as the leaders of the Chinese table tennis team, have been in the spotlight for their personal consumption behavior and career development. However, the situation of these two athletes is not representative of the overall star and career gap, because the level of celebrity income is affected by a variety of factors, including personal popularity, market demand, commercial value, and so on.
In general, Liu Shiwen's 60,000 yuan Dior jacket has aroused the public's attention to the professional public image and private life rights, while Zhang Jike's monthly salary of 30,000 yuan has triggered people's comparison of the treatment of professional athletes and the income of ordinary professionals.