After #烟花禁燃 the "relaxation order", the ten cities responded: most of the policies remain unchanged, and a few are waiting for notice#
##q1##
Recently, the "relaxation order" on the fireworks ban policy has attracted widespread attention. According to the latest news, responses from ten cities have been coming one after another. Let's take a look at the attitudes of these cities!
Ten cities responded to the "relaxation order" of the fireworks ban: most of the policies remain unchanged, and a few officials have ambiguous attitudes
###**Description: After the implementation of the "relaxation order" of the fireworks ban, ten cities gave a clear response to the policy adjustment, most of the cities said that the policy would not change, but the official attitude of a few cities was still ambiguous. Read on for more details. **
---
Most cities have responded positively to the "relaxation order", adhered to the original fireworks ban policy, and continued to maintain strict management. For example, large cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou emphasize that the fireworks prohibition area remains unchanged and does not allow any form of fireworks. The cities said that although the "relaxation order" allowed the sale of fireworks, safety and environmental protection were always top of mind. They believe that fireworks not only produce noise and air pollution, but can also cause fire and injury accidents.
However, a few cities showed some hesitation and ambiguity in their responses. For example, the cities of Chengdu and Xi'an said they were waiting for a notice from higher authorities and would make adjustments according to the new policy. This has sparked some controversy, with some fearing that it could lead to grey areas in some local governments enforcing fireworks bans.
Experts believe that after the fireworks ban was relaxed, the city's response was diverse. On the one hand, some cities stick to the original policy, emphasizing environmental protection and safety awareness. On the other hand, a small number of cities have shown a degree of wait-and-see and concern. This difference is mainly due to the economic and cultural differences between cities and the decision-making style of the government.
For the general public, their attitudes towards the fireworks ban policy also vary. Some support the policy, arguing that banning fireworks would improve the quality of the city's environment and reduce the risk of air pollution and fire. However, there are also concerns that fireworks are part of traditional Chinese culture and that the ban on fireworks may have an impact on folk traditions and festivals.
In any case, with the implementation of the "relaxation order", we believe that each city will adjust its policies according to its own actual situation. Whether it is sticking to the original policy or moderately relaxing restrictions, it is necessary to find a balance under the premise of safety and environmental protection. At the same time, it is also very important to strengthen publicity and education to raise the public's awareness of environmental protection and safety.
Overall, the "relaxation" of the fireworks ban has triggered a response from 10 cities, with most of them sticking to the original policy and emphasizing environmental protection and safety, while a few cities have shown wait-and-see and concern. These responses reflect the differences and challenges between different cities. It is believed that with further communication and adjustment, the fireworks ban policy will better meet the needs of social development.
Seeing this, what do you think about the "relaxation order" of the fireworks ban policy? What is your city's response to this? Welcome to leave a message to discuss!