In this day and age, each of us is a critic. With the explosion of information, everyone has the opportunity to openly express their views and opinions. Today, I would like to share with you some thoughts on the recently released movie "Do Not Disturb 3" and director Feng Xiaogang.
First, let's talk about the movie. "Do Not Disturb 3", as the latest sequel to the series of movies, has undoubtedly attracted the attention of many fans and audiences. However, I have to ask a question: are Ge You and Shu Qi really suitable for a middle-aged painful love story? It is undeniable that both lead actors are outstanding actors, but with the passage of time, the audience's requirements for character adaptability are also changing. We expect to see more realistic and resonant emotional expressions on screen.
Let's take a look at director Feng Xiaogang. He is a heavyweight in the Chinese film industry that cannot be ignored, but the way he has dealt with historical facts in his works in the past has raised my doubts. Sometimes, in the face of entertainment and commercial interests, does art lose its due sense of responsibility, and how should a responsible artist balance creative freedom and social responsibility?
As for Shu Qi, is there an untold story in the entertainment industry behind the title of "goddess"? In her early years, she broke into the entertainment industry with her bold moves, which to a certain extent reflected the complex attitude of society towards the image of women and their value perception.
In addition, we also need to consider the impact of the current social changes in celebrity behavior standards. Modern actresses shape their image through diverse, positive participation in public welfare activities, etc., especially in the current social media era.
At the end of the day, "Do Not Disturb 3" is just a microcosm of a cultural phenomenon. It reflects the problems within the entertainment industry of our time: such as the potential loss of artistic quality driven by the market, how the image of celebrities is shaped, and how the public receives and evaluates this information.
I hope that through my views, more audiences and peers can be awakened to think about the current state of the entertainment industry and the boundary between obligations and responsibilities of cultural products themselves. After all, there is always something to be explored and understood behind the glamour.
Finally, allow me to conclude with one sentence: finding a balance between appreciation and criticism may be what we as viewers should strive for.