Now it's normal to refer to the game's praise rate before buying a game, and it has even become a habit for Steam players, and even if a good game has some bad reviews, this is also a normal thing, after all, there are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand readers. But now some of the bad reviews have taken a turn of the sour, as some players seem to have detached themselves from the game itself and are venting their emotions in another malicious way.
For large gaming companies, this so-called "brainless review" usually doesn't have a substantial impact on the game. But for those niche titles that are developed independently, every "brainless review" that has nothing to do with the game's content can cause a lot of damage to the game's reputation and the production team behind it.
Compared with the previous game "Portia Time", the new "Time of Sandstone" has been improved in character design and picture quality, so that players can better integrate into the game world. Some players even believe that Time in Sandstone is no longer just a game, but more like a home created with the main characters in the game.
Although the EA version of "Time in Sandstone" has a positive rating of more than 80% and has received "very good reviews" on Steam, it is still not immune to some bizarre bad reviews.
IN THE COMMENTS SECTION OF STEAM, SOME PLAYERS OFFERED REASONS FOR NOT RECOMMENDING IT, SUCH AS "SORRY, BUT I'M A PERSON WITH NO FRIENDS, SO CAN I MAKE THE INSTALLATION OF MULTIPLAYER OPTIONAL?" It's too much memory, and it's still an eyesore to watch", and "how long has it been here, and there is no multiplayer mode yet".
For example, some players feel that there is too much content in the game, "there are many tasks that can't be done at all, and there are no other things to do", and some players feel that "the content is a bit small, and I feel that after a few days of playing, I have nothing to do".
It's hard to know what to say, because they seem to completely ignore the gameplay, story, and graphics of the game, and are just based on personal preferences. And whether you do multiplayer mode or not, whether you have more or less content will attract these bad reviews.
What's more, there are also bad reviews that are not expressed in words.
If you are dissatisfied with the game, it is very meaningful to make a reasonable criticism whether it is to give advice to the developer or to make a reference for the player. And these bad reviews really don't know what they want to express, maybe they just want to lower the praise rate by themselves.
FORTUNATELY, SANE PLAYERS STILL MAKE UP THE MAJORITY, AND AS A RESULT, TIME IN SANDSTONE STILL MAINTAINS A PARTICULARLY POSITIVE RATING ON STEAM. But no matter what, we all like that the environment of the domestic game market can be a little better, after all, there are not many people who are willing to make stand-alone games these days.