The "stop-work order" behind the controversy
A notable news recently circulating on social media claiming that "workers over the age of 60 can no longer go to work on construction sites" has sparked widespread controversy. The so-called "lockout order" policy proposal was intended to focus on the safety of older workers, especially when working in high-risk work environments, but the problem is much more than it seems.
The relationship between age and health
First, we need to recognize that age does not equate to health. It is unfair to link the ability to work solely with age, as people may have very different health outcomes within their age group. Some workers over the age of 60 are still fit and able to perform a variety of manual tasks, while some young people may not be able to do the same job due to health problems. Therefore, policymakers should pay more attention to an individual's health, rather than judging whether a person is suitable for a certain job based solely on age.
Technology substitution and training opportunities
The rapid development of modern technology offers an alternative to the field of manual labor, which means that even older workers may no longer need to take on high-risk work themselves. However, this substitution is not without cost. Policymakers need to devote more resources to training and training opportunities to help older workers adapt to new technologies and jobs. This will also help reduce the risk for older workers while safeguarding their employment opportunities.
Potential impact of a ban on work
In addition to livelihoods, work has multiple meanings for individuals, such as self-esteem, lifestyle and family economy. Excluding older workers from work can take a toll on their self-esteem and social status, while potentially negatively impacting their family's economic situation. Policymakers must carefully consider these potential impacts to ensure that policies are aimed at improving the quality of life for older workers, rather than stripping them of their dignity.
Develop a humane policy
Taking these factors into account, policies should be more humane, focusing on balancing security and respect for human dignity. This could include improving workplace safety standards to ensure older workers are not exposed to unnecessary risks at work, while providing better livelihood security to reduce pressure on their livelihoods. Governments and employers can take steps to encourage older workers to be active in work and provide flexible working arrangements that adapt to their needs.
Ensure safety, respect and value
In formulating policies, three core principles should be ensured: safety, respect and value. Older workers deserve the same safety and respect in a working environment as workers of other ages. Governments, employers and unions can work together to ensure that older workers are properly protected at work while receiving the respect and value they deserve. This contributes to a more inclusive and equitable society.
conclusion
The employment and working conditions of older workers is a complex issue that requires a combination of factors. While ensuring their safety is paramount, policymakers cannot ignore their dignity and worth. A better quality of life for older workers can be achieved through humane policies, training opportunities and improved safety standards, while protecting their rights. Ultimately, the goal of the policy should be to respect and promote the dignity and worth of every older worker while ensuring safety. This will contribute to a more equitable and inclusive society where everyone can participate and contribute fully.