The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Introduction: In today's tense Sino-US relations, the US military has frequently shown unexpected actions recently, and no longer maintains its previous arrogant posture. This series of anomalies has attracted widespread attention, especially as the PLA has demonstrated its ability to rewrite the rules of the game. Let's examine each of the three "retreats" of the US military and explore the potential variables.
The first incident occurred in August, when the People's Liberation Army (PLA) launched a large-scale exercise, causing jitters on Taiwan. The reaction of the US military was surprising, especially the aircraft carrier "Reagan", which has been dangling near the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. Like last year's PLA's "encircling Taiwan" military exercise, it chose to "run away" again, which made former officials of the island's defense department sigh and have doubts about whether the "Reagan" will come back to "take care" of Taiwan.
Next, we looked back at the US-Canada-ROK Yellow naval exercise some time ago and found that the USS America fled to the Sea of Japan in a hurry after only 5 hours of military exercise. This raises doubts about the true combat power of the US military, which may be one of the reasons why the US military advocates avoiding friction with the PLA. The recent variable is also the attitude of the Pentagon, with Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and incoming Air Force Chief of Staff Brown, both advocating avoiding war with Chinese mainland. This compared with the previous position in favor of Ukraine, which led to a series of speculations.
Why does the U.S. military advocate avoiding friction with the PLA? First of all, the PLA's military progress has made it difficult to defend Taiwan Island, and the loss of this containment means will make the United States lose its effective "card" to curb Chinese mainland development. Second, observe the recent developments of the US military, especially in the area of nuclear weapons, and problems are frequent. Of the U.S. nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, only the Ford is still on duty, and the remaining 10 are undergoing repairs or waiting for the restoration of ocean-going capabilities. This suggests that the current military power of the United States may not be sufficient to support its status as a "world hegemon."
In terms of nuclear submarines, the commander of the USS Alabama ballistic missile nuclear submarine Lyle was recently removed, becoming the first nuclear submarine commander in the history of the US military to be removed. The reason given for this move by the US military is "loss of confidence in his ability to command." The occurrence of this incident is worrying, especially considering that the submarine has been deployed to the Western Pacific several times. The outbreak of the U.S. nuclear weapons issue could exacerbate tensions in Sino-US relations.
While the United States is mired in the nuclear weapons issue, the People's Liberation Army continues to strengthen its strength, and Senior Colonel Wu Qian, spokesman of the mainland defense department, clearly pointed out a clear path to the United States. Wu Qian said, "The exchanges between the two militaries have not been interrupted, and the two sides have maintained frank and effective communication through military diplomatic channels. However, he stressed that "what the United States lacks is not communication channels, but the courage and action to face reality and correct mistakes." "This may be a true portrayal of the current Sino-US relationship, the situation is complex and variable, and the interaction between the two militaries may become a key factor in the future direction."
Revelation:
The new situation facing Sino-US relations has aroused profound thinking. First, the frequent hesitation and evasion of the US military in the tension in the Taiwan Strait suggest a change in the regional balance of power. This may be due to the rapid development of the PLA's military strength, which has caused the US military to lose its previous absolute advantage. Second, the change in the attitude of the US military leadership towards China is noteworthy, and the emphasis on avoiding war with China is not a strong one, which may reflect the perception of China's military power and concerns about the possible consequences of conflict.
There are two reasons for this change, the first is the Chinese mainland of the strong strength of the People's Liberation Army, especially the positive situation on the Taiwan Strait issue. The United States used Taiwan as its "trump card" to contain Chinese mainland, but this strategy is facing great challenges as the PLA's military strength grows. Second, the U.S. military's own problems, especially with regard to nuclear weapons. The issue of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines suggests that the U.S. military faces difficulties in maintaining its military superiority, which could affect its position in global affairs.
Philosophy:
This current event inspires us to deeply understand the changes in the balance of power in international relations, not only focusing on traditional military forces, but also considering economic, scientific and technological, diplomatic and other factors. War is not the only means of solving problems, but rather the settlement of disputes through dialogue and negotiation. At the same time, national security not only depends on military strength, but also requires comprehensive development, including economic, scientific and technological, cultural and other aspects.
In dealing with international affairs, all countries should remain calm and rational and avoid insistence and confrontation. Both sides need to face reality and seek win-win solutions, not resolve their differences through military conflict. In this era of multipolarity, cooperation is the key to solving global problems, not confrontation and confrontation.
Summary:
The new changes in Sino-US relations remind us that international relations are complex and changeable, and unpredictable factors may affect global stability. First, U.S. military movements in the Asia-Pacific region reflect concerns about China's military buildup, which could lead to a more rational approach to differences between the two sides. Second, the problems of the US military itself also highlight that a country needs not only strong military strength, but also comprehensive comprehensive national strength.
In this context, States should settle disputes through dialogue and negotiation and refrain from extreme and dangerous actions. The international community needs to work together to build a mechanism for mutual respect and dialogue on an equal footing to promote global peace and stability. Ultimately, through deepening cooperation, countries can achieve common prosperity and ensure the sustainable development of the international order.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.