Through investigation, the chief reporter found that the Chaoyang District Court entrusted the 12368 legal aid telephone to some staff who did not understand the law.
The news was posted by a whistleblower named Zhang Zequn under his real name and on social media by the relevant departments of Aite.
Immediately, this incident sparked heated discussions among netizens and led to the unfair treatment of CCTV anchors, which in turn triggered speculation and suspicion about him.
It is understood that Zhang Zequn once posted a post on Weibo for help, saying that his rights and interests were violated by American people.
The revelation has attracted widespread public attention, and there is speculation about whether there is a problem with his relationship with the United States.
What caused confusion and controversy was Zhang Zequn posting photos of his children. The move hinted that Zhang Zequn may have married and had children.
However, in the face of personal privacy, Zhang Zequn has always maintained a certain degree of secrecy, refusing to disclose his private life and the impact on his family. He wants to show another side at the right time.
As far as the whole incident is concerned, the author believes that the Chaoyang District Court's entrustment of the 12368 legal aid telephone to staff who do not understand the law is a matter of concern.
Legal aid telephone is an important public service, which is related to the protection and protection of citizens' rights and interests.
If this telephone service is handed over to someone who does not understand the law, it will undoubtedly cause more distress and problems for the person seeking help. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the Chaoyang District Court to conduct a thorough investigation into the incident and ensure the quality of the legal aid telephone service.
In addition, the specific details of Zhang Zequn's report need to be further verified. Whether there is a question of entrusting legal aid telephone calls to staff who do not understand the law requires a clear answer from the relevant departments.
At the same time, whether there is a problem between Zhang Zequn and the United States needs to be further investigated and confirmed.
We cannot disparage a person's reputation on the basis of speculation and suspicion.
The protection of personal privacy is also an important topic. In today's society, the risk of personal information leakage is increasing.
Zhang Zequn wants to keep his private life and family secret, has the right to make this choice, and should not be overly disturbed and questioned by the outside world.
At the same time, the media and the public should also respect his choice and give him enough understanding and space.
In general, the incident of the Chaoyang District Court entrusting the 12368 legal aid telephone to staff who do not understand the law has aroused public attention and brought unfair treatment to CCTV anchors.
In view of this problem, we expect the relevant departments to respond and deal with it as soon as possible and ensure the quality of the legal aid telephone service.
At the same time, it is also hoped that all sectors of society can respect personal privacy more and give individuals more choices and respect.