Before reading this article, I hope to use your rich little hands to click "follow", the content of the article picture from the network if there is infringement please contact to delete, the article at the end will have the editor's personal feelings, if there are deficiencies can comment and point out, thank you for your support.
1
Through the fog of time, we have come to the war-torn land of the Middle East. Ten years of turmoil, the world is like a dream, looking back today, it is already a different scenery. This article will take readers back through Newsweek's report, exploring what Knesstag Gottliv said on social media and the controversy surrounding her call for the use of nuclear weapons. At a time when national dignity, strength and security are at stake, her words have provoked widespread controversy and reflection. A dialogue of life and death, let us think together about the future of human civilization and peace.
2
Gottlieve, from Israel, made a striking remark on social platforms. She inadvertently ignited a flame that ignited war, claiming that the Israeli army should respond to Hamas attacks with nuclear weapons. This view is highly controversial and is considered short-sighted and even a threat to Israel's image.
Gottlieve's post mentions Israeli-developed "Jericho" series of ballistic missiles, which are said to have the ability to carry nuclear warheads. In her post, a sense of urgency can be felt, as if the country is facing a huge crisis. She called for the use of doomsday weapons against the enemy, claiming that Israel should use all weapons in its arsenal without fear.
However, that statement caused quite a stir in international disarmament organizations. Nikolai Sokov, a senior researcher at the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, noted that Israel has not publicly acknowledged possessing nuclear weapons, and Gottliev's remarks could have a negative impact on its image. This also makes Gottlieve's call even more short-sighted, because such irresponsible rhetoric could have far-reaching consequences internationally.
More crucially, Gottlieve's proposal to use nuclear weapons against Gaza is considered by experts to be ill-thought-out. Potential targets in Gaza City are very close to Israel, and the use of nuclear weapons would result in enormous damage to Israel itself. Sokov also noted that people with limited or no knowledge of nuclear weapons tend to overestimate the military utility of nuclear weapons, which is a serious miscalculation.
In this new round of military conflict involving both countries, both sides have paid a heavy price. Hamas launched military operations against Israel, and Israel carried out multiple rounds of air strikes in the Gaza Strip. According to local media reports, more than 1,900 people have been killed on both sides so far, while Israel itself has suffered heavy casualties. This conflict affects the entire Middle East and has aroused widespread concern in the international community.
Ten years ago, cooperation and co-construction seemed like a dream, but today's wars and conflicts are even more difficult. At this juncture, we should ponder whether there is a more rational and pragmatic way to resolve differences and preserve peace. Perhaps dialogue beyond force is the key to moving forward. Let us all look forward to the fact that reason and wisdom can become the common strength of humanity in these challenging times.