laitimes

Exclusive reveal: the little-known story behind the camera being robbed

author:Hansen's latest case

A shocking news incident involving an electric bicycle canopy, the robbery of a reporter's camera, and the mysterious identity of a self-proclaimed street worker. Let's uncover the truth behind this mysterious event!

Exclusive reveal: the little-known story behind the camera being robbed

It happened in Longhua District, Shenzhen, and a reporter from "Today's Concern" Huang Mingxuan went to Longhua Street to interview the news of electric bicycles installing canopies. She and her colleagues went to the vicinity of Longhua Bus Station to film news stories about electric vehicles equipped with parasols. However, the subject alleged that a person claiming to be a street office worker appeared and asked them to stop filming. When the reporter showed his work certificate, the camera was snatched away!

The move attracted a lot of attention, not only because of the theft of the camera, but also because of its mysterious identity. At first, there were rumors that he was a street office worker, and then some voices called him a bus station employee, what is the truth? This farce is incomprehensible!

Exclusive reveal: the little-known story behind the camera being robbed

Fortunately, the reporter called the police in time, and the police dispatched the police to deal with it quickly, so that the incident could be resolved. But the incident did not end there. After digging deeper, we learned more insider information. It turned out that the camera robber involved was a staff member of the Longhua Street Office in Shenzhen, which was officially confirmed. The head of the publicity section of the street office has responded to upstream news and admitted the identity of the staff involved in the incident.

Exclusive reveal: the little-known story behind the camera being robbed

At this point, you may be thinking, after the incident, will the person responsible be treated as it should? The answer is yes! Shenzhen Longhua Street attaches great importance to this matter, and the main person in charge of Longhua Street apologized to the reporter in person, and the camera has been returned to the reporter. More importantly, the staff member involved has been suspended for inspection and accountability procedures have been initiated to ensure that such incidents do not recur.

What is even more gratifying is that in the afternoon, the Propaganda Department of the Longhua District Party Committee of Shenzhen issued the latest report, saying that the personnel involved had been dismissed. This resolute measure shows that the local government in Shenzhen attaches great importance and determination to the incident.

Finally, let us hope that this incident will serve as a useful warning to encourage public institutions to be more transparent and accountable, but also to protect press freedom and the rights of journalists.

Read on