The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
In the confusion of history, it may be difficult to fully recognize the importance of the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan. This event, like the 911 incident, was powerful, but it was a landmark turning point in history that brought the United States into a new situation.
The United States overthrew the Taliban regime in just three months, but the war in Afghanistan lasted 20 years. This unfinished strategy has made the United States lose a dream, a Greater Middle East strategy. At the heart of this strategy is to control the greater Middle East, connecting three continents to achieve hegemony.
Afghanistan is crucial to the Greater Middle East strategy, and the occupation of Afghanistan is the key to mastering the Greater Middle East. However, the occupation of Afghanistan is only the beginning, and historically the occupiers must quickly march into the Middle East or be bogged down. Both the USSR and the United States fell into this trap.
The timeline of the United States strategy for the Middle East is puzzling, with the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, followed by the start of the war in Afghanistan just a month later, and the fall of the Taliban regime in December. Then, less than two years later, in 2003, the United States launched the Iraq War, which failed to end quickly. This raises the question, why is it delayed for so long? The answer is not that the president has changed, but that the 2008 financial crisis forced the United States to look back at home.
This strategic mistake caused the United States to waver, abandon the Greater Middle East strategy, and abandon the dream of global hegemony. However, the reality is cruel, and the United States is moving further and further away from its dream with each step of development.
After 10 years of delays, the United States finally decided to withdraw from Afghanistan. This is painful for the United States, but it also marks the abandonment of the Greater Middle East strategy. The decision also renders the U.S. presence in Iraq meaningless.
With the withdrawal of military power by the United States, the strategic pattern of the Middle East will change dramatically. Iran and Saudi Arabia may rise, and Israel will face more challenges. This strategic reversal will lead to a more chaotic and dangerous global situation.
The expansion strategy of the United States is not only military, but also serves the expansion of the dollar. The United States expanded with the military, culture and the dollar, but after the financial crisis, the dollar continued to expand, probably in preparation for a better return in the future.
The dollar's expansion and withdrawal are logically consistent. When the dollar expands, it flows to global capital markets, pushing up asset prices, and when the expansion ends and needs to return to the United States, tax policies and global chaos need to be put in place to attract capital back.
The United States did not leave a peace plan when it withdrew from Afghanistan, but acquiesced to the entry of Turkey and India. This will lead to a more complex situation in Afghanistan and have an impact on our country.
In the future, we will face financial and security risks that need to be mitigated, maintaining a stable strategy, but also maintaining tactical flexibility. When the expansion of the United States turns into contraction, the strategic thinking will be adjusted to serve the return strategy of the dollar.
At this juncture, we need to remain determined, tactically tough, but strategically stable to deal with the chaos and crises ahead. The timing of the dollar repatriation strategy will be the time for big things.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.