The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
Recently, the marriage turmoil between Li Meng and his coach Zhang Long has become a topic of widespread concern. The fierce attack of the original partner seems to have confirmed the existence of the so-called "marital infidelity" and misconduct, while Li Meng and Zhang Long seem to have fallen into a passive situation. However, on March 19, an article by Li Pingkang, the host of the program "Sports Hi Flipping", brought a new perspective to this incident.
He revealed in the article that Li Meng and Zhang Long had obtained a marriage certificate last year and that they were a legal couple. Therefore, some of the accusations made about the original match, such as the intimate photo of the two and Li Meng's indecent photo, can be reasonably explained, because these acts all occurred within a legal marriage and did not involve improper relationships.
In addition, Li Pingkang stressed that the divorce lawsuit between the original match and Zhang Long should be resolved by themselves and should not involve Li Meng. If the original appeal, she should sue Zhang Long, not Li Meng.
However, a netizen refuted this in the comments, pointing out that if Zhang Long's original match is true, then Li Meng and Zhang Long are both responsible, not only Zhang Long did not pay alimony, Li Meng should also bear some responsibility.
Judging from the current situation, there seems to be nothing legally to hold Li Meng responsible, after all, she is a member of the national women's basketball team and has contributed to the country. Moreover, the original disclosure of Li Meng's private photos violated Li Meng's rights and interests, and Li Meng could take legal measures to protect his rights.
However, Li Pingkang's post is clearly aimed at supporting Li Meng, hoping that she can get rid of this incident and continue her career. However, netizens did not fully agree with this position, because according to the original revelations, Li Meng and Zhang Long seemed to have an improper intimate relationship when the marriage relationship still existed.
Zhang Long explained that all this was just to keep Li Meng, an outstanding athlete, and he did not really betray the original match. The original partner also warned Li Meng in a private message afterwards, but Li Meng did not seem to respond. In the end, the original partner had to choose to reveal this incident. After the original revelation, Li Meng turned off the comment function on social media and restricted her attention, choosing to remain silent about this incident, which may be enough to prove her weakness.
The source also broke the news that Li Meng and Zhang Long had contacted the original partner privately and expressed their willingness to pay alimony, as long as the original partner stopped appealing and breaking the news. However, in the eyes of some netizens, this behavior may have been too late, and they questioned Li Meng's behavior.
However, some netizens recognized Li Meng's athletic talent and believed that she should not be implicated in this incident and affect her career development. Li Meng is undoubtedly an excellent athlete, but whether she should be held accountable for her ethical behavior has become a controversial topic.
On the whole, the marriage dispute between Li Meng and Zhang Long has triggered extensive discussions. Regardless of the final outcome, this event will have a certain impact on Li Meng's career and moral image, which also makes people wonder whether the success of an elite athlete depends only on her talent, or whether moral character is equally important.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.