Every day, the latest major events are pushed, "follow" it, and take you to deeply analyze the little-known stories behind it!
Unexpected changes have rippled on the international stage, and influence has crossed borders.
Daily Editors rounds up four international spotlights that let me pursue the truth together with questions:
News 1: Armenia, clinging to the thighs of the United States, surrendered? Nagorno-Karabakh fended for itself, and news came from the world
The territorial dispute between Azerbaijan and Armenia has once again aroused widespread concern in the international community.
It is heartbreaking that this long-standing conflict has resulted in the loss of innocent civilians and soldiers in the flames of fighting.
However, at this turbulent time, we should also see that both governments have expressed their desire to resolve the issue of ownership through negotiations and to seek a peaceful solution to the dispute.
The issue of the ownership of the Nagorno-Karabakh region has always been the most sensitive, complex and historically linked issue between Azerbaijan and Armenia.
The two governments have engaged in many dialogues and tried to find a solution that satisfies their respective interests while maintaining regional stability and lasting peaceful coexistence.
However, at the beginning of this year, for various reasons, the situation gradually deteriorated and turned into an armed conflict.
The Government of Azerbaijan has used force to regain control of the Nagorno-Karabakh region and hopes to resolve the dispute by force.
At the same time, the Armenian leadership has always insisted on resolving disputes by peaceful means and has repeatedly called for the intervention of the international community to prevent further escalation.
However, whatever the means, we should remember that every life lost as a result of this dispute is precious.
The two governments must be thoughtful and pragmatic in the ensuing negotiations to ensure that no more innocent people are drawn into the fighting.
In fact, at a time when the global situation is turbulent and turbulent, dialogue and cooperation between countries is particularly important.
Many similar disputes in history have finally achieved long-term stability and development through mutual cooperation, compromise and peaceful settlement.
As we have seen, over the past few months the two Governments have begun to work actively to find a negotiated compromise.
Of course, there are still great difficulties and challenges in this process.
But if each can listen to each other's position and respect each other's interests, it will become possible to find a way to solve the problem.
After all, it is only through joint efforts that real and lasting peace can be brought to the conflicting sides and the region.
At the same time, in the process of resolving territorial disputes, we should also reflect on whether violence should be used as a means of solving problems.
History has proven that war brings only suffering and tragedy to people, societies and countries.
In contrast, dialogue, compromise and long-term cooperation can build a more stable and thriving future.
News 2: Fumio Kishida is too insidious! Japan suspends discharge of nuclear wastewater, and China is hit with a complaint
The issue of discharging Japan's nuclear sewage into the sea has aroused widespread concern and discussion.
First of all, Japan completed the first nuclear sewage discharge operation in history, which caused a lot of controversy in the international community.
Japan then appealed to the WTO, demanding that China lift its import ban and restrict other agencies from testing Fukushima's nuclear material.
In response, both Chinese mainland and Hong Kong have taken steps to restrict imports of Japanese seafood.
Prior to this, the International Atomic Energy Agency also issued a report pointing out the lack of universal effectiveness against this problem.
This fact makes the whole incident more complicated and sensitive.
In addition, it is worth noting that in the face of public pressure, the Japanese government decided to use huge public relations expenses to carry out the cognitive transformation of nuclear wastewater.
Unfortunately, however, doing so may not really address the implications of the problem.
It cannot be ignored that it has also been significantly affected at the economic level: due to long-term internal and external factors, market demand has gradually weakened, investment confidence has declined, and many enterprises' production results have fallen into difficulty.
Especially for a country as highly dependent on imports as Japan, the impact of the nuclear sewage discharge incident cannot be ignored.
However, under the current situation, whether it is necessary to continue to rely on the Chinese market has become a question worth exploring and considering.
Whether politically, economically or humanistically, the pros and cons must be carefully weighed and solutions must be sought.
Looking at this issue from a neutral point of view, it is understandable that the Japanese government chose to discharge nuclear sewage into the sea in the context of relatively scarce resources and low energy self-sufficiency.
But at the same time, we should pay attention to and pay attention to the concerns and resistance expressed by other countries and the people around them.
Only when the issue of nuclear sewage is dealt with fairly, reasonably, scientifically and transparently can the negative impact be reduced and more supported by the international community.
News 3: The United Nations has failed to stop Palau and other countries from making remarks that undermine "one China" and ignored the mainland representatives in the audience
During the general debate of the United Nations General Assembly, the representatives of Paraguay, Guatemala and Palau had made erroneous statements in support of the Taiwan Provincial authorities, which aroused the outrage of the international community.
These incidents once again highlight the challenges that still face on a global scale in upholding the "one-China" principle.
As UN Member States, representatives of various countries gather each year to express their views on current global issues in the general debate.
However, this year's debate has become a platform to demonstrate the lack of clarity or even open violation of the "one-China" policy by some delegates.
A few representatives, including Paraguay, Guatemala and Palau, openly supported the authorities in Taiwan Province and were not stopped by the United Nations General Assembly.
In fact, the "one-China" principle is an important political basis for the United Nations to recognize and adopt the consensus that has been forged over the years.
The core idea of "one China" means that only the People's Republic of China is the sole subject that lawfully governs the territorial sovereignty and territorial integrity of the entire Chinese mainland and its surrounding islands (including Taiwan).
Therefore, in any international forum, statements in support of the Taiwan Provincial authorities are a direct challenge to the "one-China" principle.
These erroneous statements have aroused the anger and concern of the international community.
At the UN General Assembly, representatives of many countries expressed their firm support for the Government of the People's Republic of China in upholding the "one-China" principle, and severely condemned the flagrant violation of this principle by a small number of deputies from Paraguay, Guatemala and Palau.
At the same time, many media outlets have reported on these events and analyzed them in depth.
These erroneous remarks are closely related to the attempts of certain Western forces to interfere in and sabotage China's internal and external affairs.
Although the "one-China" principle is recognized and respected by more and more countries, there are still a small number of forces that continue to try to separate the Taiwan issue as a tool to balance China's influence.
It has become even more important to strengthen global oversight of the one-China principle and to demonstrate to the world through various channels the large and stable support base behind the policy.
The core meaning of "one China" not only reflects the political foundation formed by historical facts and legal basis, but also reflects the principles adhered to by the overall interests of the Chinese nation and peaceful and stable development.
The Chinese government has taken a calm and wise response to the remarks made by representatives of Paraguay, Guatemala and Palau.
A Foreign Ministry spokesman said that China will continue to urge all countries to abide by the "one-China" principle, and called on the UN General Assembly to seriously deal with these erroneous words and deeds that run counter to consensus and norms.
News four: Foxconn suddenly acted! Gou Taiming showed his "true face", foreign media: began to settle the account
A series of public statements by Foxconn Chairman Terry Gou have attracted widespread attention.
He said Foxconn will be able to leave the Chinese market at any time and transfer the industrial chain to India.
This news not only makes people worry about the future trend of China's manufacturing industry, but also sets off heated discussions about India's rise as a global manufacturing power.
Foxconn is accelerating its presence and investment scale expansion in the Indian market.
The world-renowned electronics foundry giant plans to transfer part of its production capacity from China to India and gradually establish a complete supply chain system.
However, many challenges have been encountered along the way.
Problems arising from supply chain relocation.
When the accounting began after the autumn, it was not easy to suddenly decide to move the industrial chain out of the Chinese market.
Everything from equipment transportation to plant construction to employee training takes a lot of time and effort.
Nevertheless, despite the difficulties, several factories are now in operation.
However, in the iPhone 15 put into production at Foxconn's Indian factory, the low yield rate has become a problem.
Due to the difference in personnel quality and technical level, as well as the problems in equipment operation and maintenance, there are many quality problems in the manufacturing process of products.
This situation is undoubtedly a blow for Foxconn.
Even more worrying is the impact of Apple's partnership with Foxconn in India.
Traditionally, Apple has viewed China as one of its key supply chains and manufacturing bases.
However, under the changes in the global economic pattern in recent years, especially when the US policy adjustment promotes the rise of corporate return, Apple has also begun to consider transferring some of its production capacity to other regions.
Although Foxconn's establishment of a factory in India can reduce labor costs and gain more room for profit; But at the same time, it also faced challenges: when they chose to leave the Chinese market, they only saw the superficial factors, and did not think deeply about whether the consequences were controllable; In addition, when encountering various difficulties in the new environment, the lessons will seem to be doubled.
Overall, "Made in China" is in a period of historic transition.
The "global factory" is no longer limited to China, but has blossomed more around the world.
However, for Foxconn, the road to transformation in the Indian market has not been easy.
The low yield also raises concerns about its future prospects.
In this context, we need to reflect and observe: does the change in manufacturing mean that China's industrial chain is gradually deviating from its central position? Do companies take into account the local environment and issues when expanding their overseas investments? How to improve product quality and ensure the stability of the supply chain are all difficult problems that must be seriously considered and solved in front of these enterprises.
The original is not easy, the manuscript must be studied, the picture comes from the Internet, if there is infringement, please contact to delete.
This article is only published in Toutiao.
END——