The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
To everyone's surprise, Yang Liping was involved in a dance controversy this time. As an outstanding dancer, her dedication to peacock dance can be described as extreme. She insisted on not sticking a grain of rice for thirty years, maintaining five-centimeter-long nails, and even giving up the opportunity to become a mother because she was too low in body fat to get pregnant. All this shows her deep dedication to the cause of peacock dance. However, the latest peacock dance performance has sparked controversy again.
Recently, some netizens posted a photo of Yang Liping's team performing "Peacock Dance", in which a male dancer is only wearing a pair of flesh-colored tight underwear, and almost the muscle lines of the whole body are presented unobstructed. In this performance, the male dancers and female partners performed the peacock dance on the stage, but some movements were particularly eye-catching, especially the scene of the male dancer lying on the stage, and the almost completely naked scene made the audience feel very embarrassed and overwhelmed.
However, this is not the first time that Yang Liping's team has caused controversy over the design of the peacock dance. As early as April this year, Yang Liping's apprentice Xiao Ronghao shared a video of practicing peacock dance on social media, showing male and female dancers wearing thin clothes and closely imitating the peacock's "neck crossing" movement. The video sparked questions from netizens who believed that the lack of safe distance between male and female dancers and that the movements were unsightly. There are also concerns that children may be negatively affected if they see such images. There are even questions about why peacocks have feathers while performers do not wear clothes.
In the face of questions from netizens, Xiao Ronghao said that art comes from life but transcends life, and these dance movements are inspired by the real behavior of peacocks. However, many people still think that these daring dance moves are just borrowing the name of art and are actually doing indecent things. This has sparked widespread discussion, but such controversy is not uncommon throughout the literary and artistic world.
Looking back on 2007, the movie "Color Ring" directed by Ang Lee was a great success. Although the film won the Best Director Award at the 44th Taiwan Film Golden Horse Awards, and actor Tony Leung also won the Best Actor Award, the most controversial part of the film is the three bold scenes. The audience was so outraged by the images that Tony Leung's wife, Carina Lau, even left the cinema because of it. Some viewers felt that Ang Lee presented the implicit emotions in the original book too naked, which caused controversy.
This phenomenon of misconduct in the name of "art" is growing in the entertainment industry. For example, last year, the TV series "Gentlemen of the East Eighth District" directed and starring Zhang Han was removed from the Internet because of a scene that did not respect women. The audience criticized Zhang Han's behavior as impolite, and People's Daily also accused his work of not conforming to mainstream values. This phenomenon of packaging misconduct as art is not uncommon in the entertainment industry.
Many actresses feel helpless when faced with inappropriate behavior, because they need to take into account the feelings of the director and the audience, and it is difficult to speak out against these unseemly behaviors. However, some actresses dare to defend their rights and interests, but they are a minority. There are some arts that do not require the actor to make sacrifices for this, but are imposed on the actor, while some sacrifices are ignored. This makes people wonder, what is real art?
In this day and age, many people are confused by so-called art, finding it increasingly kitschy and uninteresting. When desire dominates so-called "art," we have to ask ourselves, where is the real art? In the context of changing times, we need to rethink what true art is and whether we are willing to pay for it. Only in this way can we appreciate and create truly valuable works of art.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability. Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.