When the world situation is extremely unstable, everyone's reaction when they hear about the contradictions between countries must be wondering, whether there will be a world war.
In the event of a world war, it would cause great harm to the whole world, and no country would be spared under such circumstances.
As for Japan, if three wars really break out, the former US Secretary of State commented that he believed that they would take the lead in launching an attack on the three countries of China, the United States, and Australia.
The intention of his statement is not known, but such statements are still very controversial, because such statements are obviously not supported by reliable evidence.
First of all, judging from the three countries mentioned in it, among which the relationship between Japan and the mainland is not friendly, and even some contradictions between the countries, it is obviously possible that Japan will attack the mainland.
Moreover, in the serious situation, the confrontation between the two countries in the Asia-Pacific region is always inevitable, although it is not a world war, and the mainland will further conflict with Japan on the Taiwan incident, but the contradiction between the two countries and Japan is not so strong when it comes to mentioning the United States and Australia.
Among them, especially the United States, for a long time the United States has achieved control over Japan, and even has a certain stationing of troops in Japan, which is actually a restriction on Japan, but it is also under the leadership of the United States that Japan, a small country, the current economic development to an extremely good point, if they really hate the United States, it is the United States has long suppressed them.
However, in the event of a world war, the United States is actually the most advantageous umbrella for them, so it is obviously considered unlikely that Japan will launch an attack on the United States, and if they attack Australia, it will only be a further expansion of their national ambitions.
Although Japan had the intention of attacking these countries, in fact, in terms of the country's military strength, even if they were the first to attack these three countries, they did not seem to have such strength when the three wars broke out.
Japan's most advantageous armed forces are their Self-Defense Forces, but under the premise of long-term adherence to the United States, coupled with their post-war constraints, in fact, their country's military defense capability is indeed very strong, but its aggressiveness remains to be examined.
Although the Japanese government has increased their military spending this year, it is clearly trying to improve its country's military capabilities, which is also a process that will need to be accumulated over a long period of time.
Today, Japan's Self-Defense Forces total 180,000 people, more than 1,430 main battle tanks on land, and 805 aircraft on the Air Self-Defense Force.
Not to mention that in the face of China and the United States, they have not achieved absolute superiority in numbers, and in fact, the weapons models in their armed forces are not enough to match the advanced performance of Chinese and American weapons.
Their initial standout aspect is clearly in the deployment of the Maritime Self-Defense Force, which Japan has the highest level of informatization, and they also have two light aircraft carriers, as well as two upgraded aircraft carriers and two large surface ships such as amphibious assault ships.
Among them, Japan's Izumo-class aircraft carrier, its full load displacement of 27,000 tons, after certain modifications, it can carry 10 F35B stealth fighters, helicopters are also about 18, but its country's aircraft carrier compared with the aircraft carrier of China and the United States, can indeed only be regarded as a light aircraft carrier, even a medium aircraft carrier can not be called.
However, Japan's military strength can be highly evaluated in Asia, of course, it also shows that they have their own advantages, among which Japanese submarines have many advantages, they can greatly reduce noise when sailing underwater, and they even have the quietest conventionally powered submarines in the world.
At the same time, the anti-ship capability of the Japanese fleet is also very strong, but in general, Japan's military strength is still stronger in terms of defensive characteristics, and there are still certain deficiencies in attack capabilities.
In addition, in addition to the difficulty of delivering substantial blows to China and the United States, although Japan has a certain military advantage over Australia, this does not mean that they can defeat Australia in wartime.
Although Australia's military strength and military equipment are weaker than Japan, there is still a certain part of the gap in maritime operations, not to mention their destroyers and submarines, etc., which are slightly inferior to Japan, so from the comparison of military strength alone, Japan obviously has certain advantages.
But if there is a real war, from the geographical perspective of Australia, if Japan wants to strike them, it will need to fight in the ocean, which will involve the supply and strategic transportation capabilities throughout the process. However, from the current situation, it is clear that Japan does not have a greater advantage in long-range combat.
Therefore, it is obvious from the above situation that it is difficult for Japan to defeat each other by relying on its own ability to defeat each other no matter which country in Shanghai, China and the United States, not to mention that when the three wars broke out, it is likely that they themselves will be difficult to protect themselves, and how can they have the strength to launch an attack on these three countries?