A video makes people angry, and a few keywords in it make people even more uncalm. What is the truth about the suspected Japanese cutting in line at the hotel?
We all restored the details of the time from the video already on the Internet, but is everything in the video the truth? A reporter interviewed the hotel staff, learned several news from the parties concerned, and confirmed the identity of the customer at that time.
In fact, people are concerned about the following points, the first is whether the guests at that time cut the line, the second is whether the tour guide said that foreigners are preferred, and the third is whether the guests are really Japanese?
(The pictures in this article are all from the Internet)
These are the three key factors behind the outrage, because jumping in line is not allowed anywhere, whether it's an expatriate or a native. Cutting in line is a manifestation of no moral quality, and it is understandable to be criticized.
And when the words of foreigners are given priority, it will also attract ridicule from people, and the priority objects can be the elderly, children, women and children, because this is humility.
The hotel's response let us know the details at the time, it turned out that the customers were really foreigners, and the identity of the Japanese on the Internet was not wrong, as for the tour guide, the hotel denied that there was such a person.
If there was no tour guide, then naturally there would be no tour guide who would give priority, and the hotel also emphasized that the Japanese guests at that time did not cut the line.
If these guests are only Japanese, there is no queue and no arrogant tour guide, then it is common for them to choose to stay in the local area, and it is understandable that people want to visit us, which only proves that the local area is good.
If the hotel's story is the truth, then netizens really don't need to be angry, because there is no source of anger in this matter. After all, the reason why I was anxious at the beginning was because someone cut the queue and the identity of the other party was emphasized, and the tour guide emphasized these key factors.
It's just that this incident still doesn't make some people understand, since there was no behavior of cutting the queue at that time, and no tour guide said such a sentence, why would someone take a video and speak rudely? And why is the person who broke out the swear words so angry?
If he can also stand up and tell a story, maybe the hotel's answer can convince more people, after all, a person's perspective is limited, and we, the bystanders, are not the parties who were at the scene at the time, so we have to listen to the opinions of the parties.
Everyone should know that the tour guide is the core of a team, and the tour guide is also a staff member of the travel agency, so the tour guide's speech will affect people's travel experience, and the words spoken by the tour guide will also affect people's feelings, so in this matter, people's reactions will be stronger.
But after this interview, people found out that the tour guide they once thought did not exist? This fact may also make people start to reflect on whether our perspective at that time was too narrow, so we were subconsciously guided by opinions and ignored respect for the facts.
After all, the hotel's response can be said to be objective, if they don't admit that there are tour guides, then naturally there will be no tour guides, what else can there be?
Perhaps, while respecting their own emotions, people should also pay more attention to the facts.