Rush to the hot search! Should the rule of "courtesy to pedestrians" be abolished?

Recently, "should polite pedestrians cancel" rushed to the hot search, what is going on?

　　

Speaking of "courtesy to pedestrians", car owners should be no strangers, or they are still impressed, after all, deduction of points and fines are heartache. Of course, this is also to ensure the safety of pedestrians, now the number of cars on the road is soaring, based on this in 2017 the country began to implement the new rules of "courtesy to pedestrians", which should have become a beautiful scenery in the city, but since the implementation has been controversial, so that now there are calls for cancellation.

　　

In fact, in the final analysis, it is still the issue of the right of way between people and cars, but with the passage of time, the contradiction of "who goes first" has intensified, and the root cause of drivers' disgust lies in the "arrogance" of pedestrians, ignoring traffic lights, zebra crossings, directly crossing the road, standing on zebra crossings to make calls, walking in pairs, etc., and do not care whether they hinder normal traffic, which is like my most bullish posture.

　　

At this time, the unreasonable behavior of pedestrians is cool to themselves, but it is really miserable for drivers, because they must immediately stop politely, can not violate traffic regulations at all, sometimes encounter rush hour, and even wait for ten minutes, a road is blocked by water. For this behavior of pedestrians, to put it bluntly, it is to use traffic rules as a "protective umbrella", which completely violates the original intention of courtesy to pedestrians.

　　

In fact, the fundamental starting point of the so-called "courtesy" is to ensure the safety of pedestrians, after all, compared with the steel body, people are still vulnerable groups in travel. In addition, in order to further protect the safety of pedestrians, some cities have also introduced a "5-meter no-parking zone" regulation, that is, a no-parking zone within five meters in front of the zebra crossing, which shows that it is really painstaking for pedestrian safety, but some people always think that in case of encountering a road rage car owner, the consequences are really unimaginable.

　　

Will this rule be abolished? Bold guess will not be hastily canceled.

After all, this rule itself is not wrong, and not every pedestrian is "evil", not to mention the elderly and children, this kind of people urgently need the help of "polite pedestrians", and driver friends are also willing to stop and give way, so the rules of "polite pedestrians" still have more benefits than disadvantages, and they can't deprive rule-abiding people of their due rights because of the bad behavior of several people.

　　

Secondly, under the rule of "giving way to pedestrians", the probability of traffic accidents is indeed reduced, which also proves the necessity of this rule. However, in order to maintain a good traffic environment, I personally feel that it is still necessary to optimize appropriately, and a legal constraint should be added to the "casual" behavior of pedestrians, such as placing more cameras at various intersections, and pedestrians must also be punished if they violate the law, rather than blindly favoring pedestrians as they are now.

　　

It is also the lack of details that has led many car owners to demand the cancellation of "courtesy to pedestrians". Because under the current regulations, in the face of some pedestrians who do not abide by the traffic rules, if the owner does not observe in advance for courtesy, he will directly deduct points and fine; And if the courtesy does not meet the pedestrian in time, it is directly responsible. To be honest, car owners do have too much difficulty driving, so they demand equality before the rules, and pay attention to comity in addition to equality. So, do you think it's time to cancel?