In 2012, 39-year-old Guo also had an Internet war with Wang Zijian.
When the Deyun Society held a wire festival performance at the Beizhan Theater, Lao Guo and his partner Yu Qian performed a new crosstalk work "Disi Youth". After this video was broadcast on the Internet, a number of Internet jokers led by "Sword God Grape" posted that the young man plagiarized his original joke, and the similar content of more than 20 minutes of crosstalk reached more than 80%.
Lao Guo immediately posted on Weibo, saying that it was all materials sent by netizens. Jin Jianboyou cursed Fang Zhi Zhi Zhi Zhi Zhi Joke Weber caused the original author to be displeased because of my negligence, hereby solemnly apologize, and immediately remove all the jokes involved, not a word, please look forward to the 2.0 version of the Disi Youth staged.
Sword God Grape also responded, first, I said you plagiarized, why did I curse you? Second, since you want to apologize, why did you block me? Third, if I expose your plagiarism, you will not have to deal with me in the future, is this the work of the eldest husband? Why didn't you say how to compensate?
After that, Lao Guo did not respond positively to the grapes, and posted on Weibo, saying that you can see through you. Your name is by your name, sit still and listen to the dog whistle.
Jianshen Grape is the writer of "Tonight's Eighties", so the boss Wang Zijian posted a Weibo to ask Lao Guo for justice, saying that you are such a big wrist, how can you be like a complaining woman, you are not wronged, and you also complain to tens of millions of your fans, from today I look down on you.
Lao Guo replied, that ticket mate, don't make trouble, you look forward to me taking care of you every year on your birthday, I want to be red and crazy.
Since then, the two people have been back and forth on Weibo, fighting lips and tongues, and fighting for several rounds, because I have said in detail in the video in my previous "Wang Zijian Collection", so I won't talk about it here.
In fact, as early as 2008, Lao Guo had plagiarism, but the other party was an ordinary netizen who was not famous, so he didn't make much movement. On January 6 of that year, NetEase forum netizen Zhulin Eighth Sage posted a post called "Guo Degang, should you pay me for my manuscript?" The article claims that one of Lao Guo's crosstalk was his own zero four years with the title "Can you tell the difference in this year?" ", so to ask Lao Guo for remuneration, which aroused heated discussions among netizens for a while.
What crosstalk is the eighth sage of the bamboo forest talking about? Take a look at his article and you'll be able to think of it right away.
In recent years, rumors have flown all over the world, basically true, rarely adulterated, the more you look at it, the more it looks like news, the news lies twice, conceals the truth, blows nonsense, the more you look at it, the more it looks like rumors, can you tell which is rumors and which is news?
This year, the professor is focused on money, what he has in his hand, he sells, the more he looks like a businessman, the more he looks like a businessman, the businessman is elegant, the glasses on his face, the bookshelf behind him, the more he looks like a professor, can you tell who is a professor and who is a businessman?
In these years, doctors are ruthless, just make money, regardless of human life, the more they look like killers, killers strive for excellence, like Ding Xie cattle, skillful and free, the more you look like a doctor, can you tell who is a doctor and who is a killer?
This year, stars often commit slut, sell to him today, sell to you tomorrow, the more you look like a prostitute, the more fashionable and trendy, the style, Chu Chu moving, the more you look like a star, can you tell who is a star and who is a prostitute?
This year, the director is amorous, play this and then play that, the more you look like a satyr, the satyr is amiable, seductive, tireless, the more you look like the director, you can. Can you tell who is the director and who is the satyr?
Got an impression, right? In fact, there is nothing strange, if Lao Guo's crosstalk can't find an Internet joke, then it's really strange. It's just that the source of most of the paragraphs cannot be verified, so it is used, and no one will pursue it anyway. Or like "I Want to Cross", it was just a small inspiration from a netizen at the beginning, posted on the Internet, everyone saw it and thought it was very interesting, and continued to add new ideas according to this model, constantly enriching, constantly improving, and finally formed a complete story. At this time, it is impossible to tell whose copyright belongs to the collective wisdom. Lao Guo directly changed the whole article to crosstalk.
In fact, this kind of take-ism is not a big deal, the key is that there is really an original creator to come to the door, what attitude should you have? If you are the PR of Deyun Society, what will you let Lao Guo do? I'm afraid the best way is to post an article to thank the author, give the manuscript fee, or even hold a press conference, give bonuses on the spot, encourage originality, make it lively, the author has a face, Lao Guo does not lose share, everyone has to praise Lao Guo can do things, absolutely no one will take plagiarism again.
But let's see how Deyun Society has treated various plagiarism incidents over the years? The cold treatment is good, and it is basically forced back. Take the eighth sage of the bamboo forest and say this. At that time, Wang Hai's response to reporters was: This netizen's approach is a bit too much. If you think about it, we often collect information from all aspects of our work, and the sources are very extensive. As far as plagiarism is concerned, we don't see it from the Internet. Now Guo Degang is on fire, everyone will pinch it, if this paragraph is not Guo Degang's, what do you think will be the result? For example, it's like we text each other, aren't good jokes all around? Guo Degang is a person who can absorb folk nutrients and integrate these things into crosstalk, can you tell whose thing this is? Besides, this netizen can't prove that it is his own creation, even if it is his own, can it prove that he and Guo Degang's crosstalk has anything to do? Crosstalk is an artistic product, which comes from society and absorbs things in society. If this is the case, it is unfair to Guo Degang to say that Guo Degang plagiarized.
Lao Guo never felt that he had a problem, and the fault was always the other party. There is a contradiction with the master, it is the master who is wrong, there is a contradiction with the apprentice, it is the apprentice who is wrong, and his peers bully him. The mainstream suppressed him, the media slandered him, the original touched him, in short, he was always right.
In early April 2006, 33-year-old Guo endorsed the secret oil drainage diet tea as a civilian idol, and within a month, he was revealed by "Youth Weekend" that the secret oil drainage was suspected of illegal production, and many advertisements were suspected of illegality. This was followed by confirmation from the Ministry of Industry and Commerce that the product advertised fraudulently using batch numbers and suspected false publicity, and Guo was sued by consumers in court.
The following year, CCTV's 315 Gala exposed the fake and shoddy product, and at the same time alluded to Guo Degang's false propaganda.
Lao Guo posted a blog post the next day called "That Night I Dreamed of a Million Soldiers", with fierce words and a spearhead directed at CCTV. The text reads:
Yesterday, 315, CCTV, electric flash, screen. Secret oil drainage, thousands of fingers, thousands of people cut their teeth.
In the third dream, woe to the gate, a voice whispered, destroy him!
If there are so many hidden and drained oil, then our relevant supervision departments have indulged it for a year, sold it in a big way throughout the country, and made taxpayers sweat and blood, is this how they serve the people? CCTV or the supervision department is extremely ruthless.
Each person's constitution is different, so there is no guarantee that everyone in the world will drink secrets. When purchasing, you should ask the sales staff in detail, according to the constitution. Such as ginseng, some people eat, strengthen the body, some people eat, clear the killing. Can you say ginseng is poison?
Some people questioned that the advertisement said to quickly smooth the big belly, saying that it didn't work, hum, this is hypocrisy, instant noodle bags are printed with prawn meat pieces, and no one has been seen hanging in the instant noodle factory. There is an advertisement on the secret card, and there are four Tibetan girls on the painting, do you want it too?
It's hard to say what happens in the world, a big star endorses a hospital specializing in infertility, you can't ask the star to fully understand gynecology, let alone ask everyone who comes to treat the disease to be pregnant. You took your great-grandmother to the hospital to get pregnant and failed, you turned around and scolded the star who endorsed it for being wrong, and you have to blame your great-grandfather.
In the years after the secret oil drainage incident, Lao Guo never stopped playing cymbals in his crosstalk, compiling CCTV or ridiculing himself, it is estimated that everyone has heard it more or less, such as a crosstalk called "Who moved my weight loss tea?" 》
In fact, Lao Guo is right, how can this kind of advertising only be blamed on the spokesperson? But you have to say that the spokesperson has no responsibility at all, and it is not realistic, after all, the influence of idols is huge, who let you take this money for endorsements?
Moreover, looking at so many spokespeople who have problems with their products, they either apologize or remain silent. Lao Guo, who was full of reason, refused to admit his mistake, and insisted that this product was fine.
This reminds me of an incident that happened when he was the same age as Jiang, that is, in 1982, 32-year-old Jiang was criticized by the Quyi magazine "Tianjin Singing", which received a letter from an audience saying how bad Jiang's crosstalk was. "Tianjin Singing" specially opened a column for this letter, and the full text was published.
After reading it, Lao Jiang wrote such a letter to Tianjin Singing.
Comrade editor of Tianjin Singing, a letter from the audience published by your journal, criticized a crosstalk segment of our performance by name. We express our gratitude to the comrades who sent the letter and to the editors. Since we (referring to Li Wenhua) cooperated, the criticism of us by magazines and newspapers has not been named, and we have not named us as this time. This has attracted our attention, and it seems that it is still appropriate to criticize it by name.
Such a culture should be formed and criticism should be welcomed. In this way, our crosstalk creation and performance can follow the right path and the music art career can develop. We will correct our shortcomings raised by readers now, and we must pay attention in the future, and we must work hard to improve the quality of crosstalk creation and performance.
Once again, I would like to express my heartfelt thanks for your useful work in opening the criticism column. Jiang Kun, Li Wenhua.
"Tianjin Singing" also published this letter. Later, because of this incident, Guangming Ribao specially published a short commentary, "Starting from Jiang Kun's Welcome to Criticism by Names," in which it said that some comrades we had made some achievements, the masses respected him, and the people gave him honor, so he fluttered up, and when he heard the criticism, he felt unpleasant, and even thunderous, making some sincere critics fearful. This is probably one of the reasons why our literary criticism has not been better developed.
Treat achievements as a burden, become famous, inflate yourself, put yourself in a special position of superiority, and look empty-eyed, you must refuse to criticize the door.
Criticism, especially one's own criticism, is welcome, and this is an enterprising with revolutionary enthusiasm and a strong mass viewpoint. The concentrated reflection of the spirit and the scientific attitude of seeking truth from facts is also of vital importance to our literary and artistic workers.
The purpose of publishing today's letter from Comrades Jiang Kun and Li Wenhua to "Tianjin Singing" is in the hope that more literary and art workers will practice the spirit of "welcome to criticize me by name," consciously pick up the magic weapon of criticism and self-criticism, open up a new generation in the field of literature and art, and add flowers to socialist spiritual civilization.
Well, let's talk about it today, I'm a comprehensive thirteen wolves, follow me, we'll see you in the next issue, bye.