Before reading this article, trouble the official to click "follow", convenient for you to discuss and share, enhance your sense of participation, the editor will continue to update wonderful articles, you officials don't miss it~
Wen | is not a pawn
Editor|Not a pawn
#历史开讲 #
introduction
This paper aims to explore the inefficiency of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty, analyze the causes of the inefficiency, and further study its performance and impact, in order to provide reference for future reform of the supervision system.
This study was conducted using a combination of documentary and historical research methods. Firstly, the relevant literature and materials are sorted out and analyzed to understand the basic composition and operation of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty.
Secondly, through the study of historical events and individual cases, this paper deeply analyzes the reasons for the inefficiency of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty. Finally, the above research results are integrated to explore the manifestations and effects of the inefficiency of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty.
The inefficiency of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty was not only a flaw in the political system of the Song Dynasty, but also reflected the problems and challenges in the reform of the modern supervision system. Therefore, this study has important practical significance and enlightenment significance for deepening the reform of China's modern supervision system and improving political clarity and integrity.
One. The basic composition of the supervision system
The basic composition of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty included three aspects: supervision organs, supervision personnel, and supervision systems.
In the Song Dynasty, there were three main supervisory organs of the local supervision system: observation envoys, inspectors and sentencing envoys. The Observer is primarily responsible for the supervision and management of local administration and judicial work; Inspectors are aimed at the inspection and supervision of local officials, and have more obvious supervisory functions; The sentencing enforcer is primarily responsible for the supervision of judicial trials.
In the Song Dynasty, there were mainly two kinds of supervisors: superintendents and supervisors. The superintendent of imperial history was appointed by the central government and reported directly to the emperor; Ombudsmen are recommended by local officials and mainly supervise and evaluate local officials.
The supervision system of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty mainly included two types: the impeachment system and the inspection system. The impeachment system mainly refers to the impeachment of officials by the imperial history, emphasizing the integrity and diligence of officials; The inspection system is to supervise and evaluate the daily work of local officials and ensure the normal operation of local governments.
Two. Establishment and responsibilities of the Supervisory Body
In the Song Dynasty, there were three main supervisory organs of the local supervision system: observation envoys, inspectors and sentencing envoys.
The Observer was the highest supervisory body in the local supervision system of the Song Dynasty, and was sent by the imperial court to serve as commissioners. The main responsibilities include the management of local administrative, financial and military affairs, as well as the monitoring of the performance, integrity and diligence of local officials.
Observation gives considerable power of intervention over local officials, and can impeach incompetent officials or recommend personnel transfers and accountability.
The inspector is a body that specifically monitors and evaluates local officials. The imperial court dispatches commissioners, and when inspecting the localities, they can randomly check the daily work and integrity of officials. The main duties of the inspector include: inspecting the localities and evaluating the performance, integrity and diligence of local officials; Unhealthy practices, corruption, and other violations of the law are discovered, and incompetent officials are promptly impeached.
Finally, the sentencing commissioner is a judicial supervision body, whose main duty is to supervise the judicial work of local officials and prevent the occurrence of unjust, false and wrong cases. The duties of the sentencing envoy include: investigating and verifying the truth of local trial cases, correcting unfair judicial decisions, and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the people. In the Song Dynasty, the supervision and restraint of local officials was relatively weak, and the intensity of supervision was relatively small, making it difficult to play an effective supervisory role.
Three. Analysis of the reasons for the inefficiency of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty
There were many reasons for the ineffectiveness of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty, among which the problem of officials themselves was one of the most prominent and important factors. During the Song Dynasty, some officials took advantage of their positions and accepted bribes to seek personal gains, which not only undermined the credibility of local governments, but also caused local governments to be unable to effectively perform their duties, and the operation of the supervision system was also seriously affected.
During their tenure of local posts, some officials acted arbitrarily, did not listen to the opinions and suggestions of their subordinates and the people, and even violated laws and regulations, resulting in a decrease in the management and service level of local governments, and the operation of the supervision system was also affected to a certain extent.
Some officials have used their powers to seek personal interests, and even colluded with local criminal and evil forces, becoming corrupt and degenerate, resulting in a serious decline in the management and service level of local governments, and a serious weakening of the role of the supervision system.
In addition, some officials lack the necessary professional knowledge and management capacity to effectively perform their duties, resulting in a decline in the management and service level of local governments, and the effectiveness of the supervision system has also been affected to a certain extent.
It should be pointed out that the problems of these officials themselves are not only an important cause of the ineffectiveness of the supervision system, but also an important factor hindering the improvement of local government management and service levels. Therefore, while improving the supervision system, it is also necessary to fundamentally solve the problems of officials themselves.
In addition to the problems of the officials themselves, another important reason for the ineffectiveness of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty was the influence of socioeconomic background. Specifically, some characteristics of the socio-economic background of the Song Dynasty had a certain negative impact on the play of the local supervision system.
In the Song Dynasty, due to the low salaries of officials and the huge "entrance fee" required the promotion of local officials, many officials had to meet their needs through corruption and bribery in order to seek higher positions and more income, which negatively affected the effectiveness of the local supervision system.
Local officials in the Song Dynasty had great power in the administrative, judicial, and military fields, but they also faced little restraint and supervision, which led to some officials abusing their power and acting arbitrarily, and the supervision agency could not effectively check the behavior of these officials, resulting in an inefficient supervision system.
In the Song Dynasty, the social class differentiation intensified, the gap between the rich and the poor widened, and social contradictions and dissatisfaction also intensified, which on the one hand led to widespread official corruption, and on the other hand, it also made the social supervision force lack effective play, further weakening the effectiveness of the local supervision system.
Therefore, when analyzing the reasons for the ineffectiveness of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty, it is necessary to fully consider the impact of socio-economic background to formulate more effective solutions.
Four. Manifestations of the inefficiency of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty
A notable manifestation of the ineffectiveness of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty was the repeated prohibition of corrupt practices such as official corruption and bribery. Although many supervision agencies were established in the Song Dynasty, such as the Punishment Inspector and the Thousand Households Office, the limited supervisory powers of these institutions and the widespread corruption and dereliction of duty among supervision officials made it difficult for local officials to effectively crack down on and restrain the corrupt behavior of local officials.
Specifically, the corruption of local officials in the Song Dynasty was mainly manifested in the following aspects. First, officials abuse their power in collecting taxes, running businesses, and controlling industry and commerce, accepting bribes and illegally seeking personal gains.
Second, some officials treat public resources as private property, such as unauthorized sale of official land, misuse of public buildings, embezzlement of government funds, etc. In addition, some officials often violate laws and regulations by forcibly expropriating private property, seriously infringing on the rights and interests of the people.
It can be seen from this that the inefficiency of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty made it difficult for officials to effectively restrain and crack down on bad behaviors such as corruption and bribery, which gradually corrupted the social atmosphere and had a negative impact on social stability and development.
In addition to failing to effectively crack down on official corruption, the local supervision system during the Song Dynasty failed to adequately maintain social stability. On the one hand, due to the dereliction of duty and corruption of local officials, the people's production and life have been affected to varying degrees, increasing social contradictions and dissatisfaction. On the other hand, the limitations and deficiencies of the supervision system itself have also caused chaos in social order.
For example, the Song Dynasty government set up a large number of special institutions to supervise local officials, such as inspectors and thousands of households, but these institutions also became a constraint on social order to some extent. Officials often use their official authority to silence criticism and opposition, and to suppress freedom of expression and public opinion oversight, which contributes to corruption and adversely affects social stability.
Therefore, the failure of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty not only allowed official corruption to continue, but also caused chaos and instability in social order, which seriously affected the development and progress of Song Dynasty society.
Finally, the local supervision system of the Song Dynasty did not fully meet the needs of the people. On the one hand, the responsibilities of supervision institutions are not clear enough, and problems such as inadequate supervision and too leniency often occur, making it difficult to effectively crack down on and correct officials' misconduct.
On the other hand, the lack of sufficient strength and resources of the Ombudsman often limits its ability to play its due role in the investigation and handling of cases.
In addition, there were some institutional shortcomings in the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty, such as the lack of openness and transparency in the selection and appointment mechanism of officials, which easily led to corruption; Collusion between local officials and local tyrants is also common, exacerbating social injustice and mass discontent. These problems made the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty unable to fully meet the people's expectations and needs for clean politics and fairness and justice.
Five. The impact of inefficient local supervision systems in the Song Dynasty
The inefficiency of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty directly affected the image and authority of the government. On the one hand, due to the frequent occurrence of corruption by officials at the local level, the inability of the supervisory organs to crack down has led to the continuous aggravation of contradictions between the government and the people, seriously damaging the image and credibility of the government.
On the other hand, the dereliction of duty and corruption of supervisory institutions make the government lack sufficient authority and credibility in dealing with official misconduct, which is easy to arouse public dissatisfaction and resistance, and further weaken the authority of the government.
The inefficiency of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty also directly affected social stability. On the one hand, the corrupt behavior of officials has caused social injustice and dissatisfaction among the masses, and it is easy to trigger social contradictions and conflicts.
On the other hand, the dereliction of duty and corruption of supervisory institutions have seriously weakened their role in dealing with official misconduct and maintaining social stability, making it difficult to effectively prevent and resolve social conflicts and disputes, and adversely affecting social stability.
The inefficiency of the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty directly affected the government's governance level. On the one hand, the continuous occurrence of official corruption has seriously affected the government's integrity construction and the realization of fairness and justice, making it impossible to improve the government's governance level. On the other hand, the negligence and corruption of the supervisory body also prevent the government from receiving effective support in investigating and handling cases, further weakening the government's governance level and capacity.
conclusion
The local supervision system of the Song Dynasty had problems in the establishment and responsibilities of supervision institutions, the operation process of the supervision system, the problems of officials themselves, corruption and dereliction of duty in supervision institutions, the impact of socio-economic background, and the shortcomings of governance concepts and policies, resulting in its low efficiency.
In terms of performance, the supervision system failed to prevent corruption, maintain social stability and meet the needs of the people, which had a negative impact on the image and authority of the government.
In future research, we can further analyze the deep-seated causes of the problems in the local supervision system in the Song Dynasty, and explore its relationship with factors such as social and political culture and institutional evolution. In-depth study of the actual operation of the local supervision system in different regions in the Song Dynasty, and explore its regional differences and change laws.
A comparative study of the local supervision system of the Song Dynasty and other historical periods and regional supervision systems is studied to explore their similarities and differences and their enlightenment for future generations. This paper draws on and reflects on the modern local supervision system, and explores how to build a more efficient and scientific supervision system on the basis of historical experience, so as to improve the level of government governance and the quality of public services.
bibliography
1. Wang Hui, Research on Local Supervision System in the Song Dynasty, China Social Sciences Press, 2007.
2. Liu Hao, A Study on Corruption among Local Officials in the Song Dynasty, Chinese Minmin University Press, 2010.
3. Zhang Ming, The Establishment and Development of Local Supervisory Institutions in the Song Dynasty, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2012.
4. Hu Yingxiang, Manuscripts of Political History of the Song Dynasty, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2014.
5. Wu Han, Performance Evaluation and Promotion Mechanism of Song Dynasty Officials, Chinese Minmin University Press, 2014.
6. Wang Junsheng, The Establishment and Reform of Local Government in the Song Dynasty, Jiangxi People's Publishing House, 2013.
7. Xu Ke, History of the Evolution of the Political System in the Song Dynasty, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2015.
8. Zheng Zhenduo, History of China's Historical and Political System, Chinese Minmin University Press, 2011.