"Collapse, should be hidden,
Because it is shown, it will be made into an earthy video. ”
The next dozen or so sentences are using the song of the new pants as an example of an earthy video,
"will be played repeatedly",
"Repeatedly crashed for this",
This phenomenon is called:
Crash version of matryoshka ↓
Is this statement funny?
Judging from the live reaction of the program,
"Laughing fruit", undeniably ↓
But with this issue of the debate,
Does it matter whether the collapse of adults should be hidden or not?
Stand in his shoes,
"Earthy video" was preset as a shameful thing in advance,
So the collapse of adults should be hidden.
But how many people can empathize with his view?
The barrage represents at least a portion of the audience.
Some people start to refute it from the example of a small video he gave,
"They've all been photographed, doesn't that just prove that they haven't hidden"?
More barrages float by are,
Don't understand what he's talking about?
However, this contradiction between argument and argument is still a matter of ability.
(After all, you can't require everyone to reach the level of Professor Liu Qing and Professor Xue Zhaofeng)
At best, it is eliminated according to the rules.
But his next act,
It is difficult not to say that he made himself a large area of complaining about him now.
Misinterpreting the statement of the opposing debater,
It's questioning.
Why let only the most vulnerable create a better world?
Why don't you go?
Rushing to the opposite side xiong hao for a second to plead,
Why didn't I go?
Did you go or not?
Evidence, there is ↓
The reason why the collapse is not necessary to hide,
It's because he thinks the world is too hard.
Everyone's emotions need to be understood and understood.
And use the courier brother as an example,
He worked hard but was still misunderstood,
Finally couldn't help but collapse,
In the face of such a collapse,
Who can bear to be harsh?
Whether it's the point of view itself or an example,
Not all are emphasizing:
A warm and inclusive society,
Adults should be allowed to behave as a collapse.
How did this get into Zang Hongfei's mouth,
Didn't you participate in creating a better world?
#为了自己表述, he has wronged the other party's statement, is this a bit unpretentious to martial virtue?
For the sake of their own point of view,
Prevent the other person from publishing (and not saying to refute) their own views.
Zang: Of course, there will be an ideal world one day in the future.
But isn't it now?
Other Party: If...
Zang: (Block) You answer my question first.
In order to get the answer you want, you refuse to talk to the other person,
What's the difference between this and a kindergarten kid arguing?
#这么害怕对方发表观点, why not cover Xiong Hao's mouth directly?"
Don't care what the other person says,
Only in his own speech gradually emotionally excited ↓
Opposite Xiong Hao, (this is not a quarrel) or leisurely...
The 1 and a half minutes of surprise time on the opposite side is in the "Why not create a beautiful world" in the same place,
Xiong Hao obviously did not want to dwell on this issue with him anymore.
Only one question was asked,
You say the collapse should be hidden,
But you look at you (the performance now),
Isn't it just that it wasn't hidden?
Opposite: I didn't break down, I did this because you didn't listen to me...
#那你说这还怎么辩, no matter how reasonable and well-founded the other party is, he just blindly denies it...
In addition to this, there are also seemingly impolite actions,
For example, pointing at the other party when speaking ↓
Sure enough, it caused a lot of disgust,
Shrew, disrespectful opponents, uncultured, not crazy...
However, the operation is as fierce as a tiger,
When it comes to actually exporting dry goods,
Without saying two words, I said, "Forget it..."
？？？ How does that matter??
Isn't this a surprise attack?
It's about defeating magic with magic,
What have you done, except questioning, stopping, agitating,
Where is your new argument?
Li Shi couldn't help but spit on him,
Has been avoiding communication,
This is the typical crash bar ↓
By the way, the golden sentence ↓
Zang Hongfei is not the first time that he has performed similarly.
Change the topic at will;
In that debate 3 years ago "Is a wedding really necessary?" ”
#这次发言也是他第一次在 received widespread attention on "Strange Story"
Admittedly, he has an accurate description of the wedding,
"It's a large absurd and contradictory private temple fair",
But his pre-debate statements cannot be ignored.
"Do we have the right not to have a wedding"↓
#议题明明就是婚礼有没有必要, you have to put it on personal rights, which invisibly occupies the moral high ground...
If others can deceive, can they deceive the "old fox"?
To the point: the concept has changed...
And when arguing with Yang Qihan about "who should apologize first when couples quarrel",
Once again, the anger was staged.
The controversial statement appeared when Ma Dong proposed that Yang Qihan's time was closed, and only Zang Hongfei could speak alone.
#对方都被闭麦了, in this case, Zang Hongfei should be able to express it more reasonably...
And, look at what he said.
"Husband and wife quarrel, infidelity, injustice and unkindness"↓
#就是吵个架, how can it be disloyal and unkind? Where is this all about?
#这是为了赢的口不择言吗?
Ma Dong: It's in a hurry...
Li Shi (there are words in the words, the connotation is master); is crazy...
Met Li Siheng, who was more emotional than him,
On the same "emotional starting line",
His logic was lacking and exposed.
#前情: The debate between the two is "In the face of the girlfriend's survival desire test, is it acting or being yourself?" Li Siheng held and cooperated with the woman to act.
Before he could debate twice, he strayed from the subject again.
"Why do you always have to do the survival test,
Why can't we go play basketball together? ”
(Why else, because what we're debating now is the desire to survive...) ）
Li Siheng was not biased by him,
Instead, it points out his inconsistencies for a second:
"This is what you mean to do that is fun for both of you.
I (my girlfriend) don't want to play basketball. ”
Opposite, start panic ↓
The famous master of the examination and research saw his current state at a glance ↓
After the chaos, the "suicide" behavior begins,
Pulling girls to commoditize themselves, objectify themselves...
Opposite (helpless), "Survival test, how to pull to the materialization?" ”
Not only the opponent is helpless,
Comments are equally helpless ↓
His solo speech was even more tragic↓
I was so anxious that I didn't say a single complete sentence.
Comments are even more rude to his performance this time,
No logic, no focus, and arrogance ↓
Similar situations have been repeated too many times,
No wonder some people say ↓
It is not surprising that he has not improved,
Obviously, I participated in a show where more than half of the audience was young people.
But refused to deal with young people ↓
I don't even want to know about the programs I participate in,
"I don't look at the strange things to say" ↓
I also don't realize that I am being complained about because of poor business ability.
#直到这次回归, still unaware...
Also pull up Li Siheng and milk tea contrast,
It's also all about venting emotions.
Why do these two people get cute and cute, but they are greasy?
#你说为啥, because the output of the other two is justified and well-founded...
He did not understand such differential treatment and felt "strange"↓
And it comes down to the look problem...
Saying that he and Ding Taisheng were both scolded,
It's because both have long hair, beards and ugly ↓
(Teacher Zang, you really don't know where your problem is, so you might as well check out this article... ）
There are problems with key business capabilities, and they are not actively improving.
The director asked him what he was preparing for this return.
Opposite: Did Thermaki ↓
#热玛吉: I can only smooth the folds, not comb through the logical confusion...
Very confident as you can imagine.
Confidence in looks:
"A handsome guy"↓
"The teacher said I could fit in a movie."
Confidence in their own business,
Because after the debate with Xiong Hao was complained about,
I don't think there's anything wrong with this kind of "sharp white face" in a debate program.
It's all about making excuses for yourself↓
As an artist who has successfully transformed into a dan player,
Becoming popular in the early days because of witty words does not mean that you can eat a lifetime of gold sentences with less than 140 words.
Since I decided to become a debater of a debate program,
That should still be a debater's minimum logical and methodical output.
Not really,
Go back to your old business,
Keyboard player is also very good ↓
#看, what he is good at is to comment on the first thing is that someone is really praising him handsome
Last sentence
Hopefully he can use the standards of a band
To ask Zang Hongfei, who has now transformed into a debater
Such a complaint may not be so overwhelming