I believe that everyone is already clear about the recent outbreak of another bloody border conflict between China and India.
After Modi came to power by agitating for populism, India's public opinion environment began to move towards extreme populism. In order to suppress China, the United States is actively "cultivating" in the field of Indian public opinion, mixed with India's own territorial expansion strategy, and a variety of factors have led to the fact that China-India relations can never be truly "peaceful" today. The extreme public opinion has also prompted many border military generals to seek their own political interests by creating border conflicts between China and India.
This time the bloody border clashes can clearly see that New Delhi has been put in a very embarrassing position by public opinion. On the timeline, the conflict actually broke out in early December, but it was really hyped up close to mid-December. In the words of the western theater of the mainland, in the Dongzhang area of the Sino-Indian border, our army's patrol team was attacked by the Indian army crossing the line. Our department should handle "professional, standardized and powerful". Obviously, the Indians suffered a big loss. According to the extranet, India injured more than 20 people and fractured 6 limbs.
China has always been very unlikely to report this kind of thing, I believe everyone knows it. In general, Indians must like to talk everywhere, even if they lose, they must say that they have won, touting everywhere, and agitating populism. But the Indian official was surprisingly "quiet" this time and did not poke outward. However, several rumor-mongering media, led by the Indian media "EurAsia Times" and "The Hindu", suddenly began to "exert force", hyping up another bloody conflict between China and India in the border area. Subsequently, the Western media also began to come down, vigorously advocating hype, and the news quickly exploded international public opinion.
Not only began to hype the topic, but many Indian media began to lead the rhythm, vigorously encouraging populism in India and clamoring for the people to prepare for war with China. At the same time, these media briefly criticized the Modi government's foreign policy, believing that it should learn "lessons" and actively move closer to the United States, claiming that some people in India do not trust the United States, which is wrong. In particular, India should not reject the "Quadrilateral Agreement" and "Indo-Pacific Strategy" of the United States.
To put it bluntly, the overall process of public opinion fermentation in this incident, in fact, Modi is also very big, and the West has not given New Delhi a chance to choose at all. Although Modi came to power through populism, at this stage, India still takes a path of "neutrality" and "secretly development", and does not want to completely use the Americans as cannon fodder. However, with the hype of public opinion, New Delhi's attitude towards China policy and attitude towards the border situation will be subject to populist opoulism. In particular, India is still a pure example of the voting system of Western countries, and for the sake of voters and support, "political hooligans" have to follow the populist path if they want to come to power and stabilize their position, even if they are wrong.
In addition, it should be noted that in early December, the United States and India just conducted a small military exercise on the mainland border, followed by border clashes. It is very likely that relevant US personnel have bought and acquired some key personnel in the troops stationed on the Indian border. China must remain vigilant in this regard. (Listen to the wind)