Plato is blamed for the fact that the sublime scholarship "must be called Greek by word."
The laurels of scholarship, the honor attributed to ancient Greece, the reality of the new crown, the responsibility is counted on Plato's head.
Although ancient Greek thought could not spread the virus, the idea would inherit the transmission, affecting the human strategy of preventing the virus, leading to the spread of the virus.
"Illness arises from the heart", "heart" is not only a mood, but also includes thoughts, because thoughts guide all actions, food, clothing, shelter, and medicine.
From the beginning of the outbreak of the new crown, the West decided to lie flat, the defense is unstoppable, how comfortable it is to lie flat.
The West lies flat, the world (except China) lies, and the world practices the ancient Greek philosophy of the weak and the strong, at the cost of millions of deaths.
That ancient Greek Plato, not only engaged in spiritual love, but also family planning, his "Republic" clearly said: to control the population, lowly life should be treated like garbage.
Plato's reason is simple, raising animals must be beautiful, how about people?
However, Plato did not lead by example, and his beloved teacher Socrates was ugly in appearance. It seems that the "double standard" of the West is also super historical: whether it is ugly or beautiful, I have the final say.
Appearance is justice, ugly people give me to die!
Plato always wanted to get rid of the inferior people, because the utopia of the noble blood of human beings had no room for inferior people.
Modern Malthusian theory of population, which controls population growth, also targets the poor.
"Narrow the streets of towns, crowd more people in small houses, and let the plague resurface." Malthus was more powerful than Thanos, who randomly wiped out half of the population, and Malthus struck the poor with precision.
I'll slap a finger, and the poor ghosts will die!
The new crown came, just as Malthus had hoped, and it came too soon.
The new crown is eliminated, the elderly (if old and not poor, cloned antibodies are available), the poor (hard resistance, death means that you have poor physique and cannot complain about others).
From Plato to Malthus to the coexistence of the new crown, the consistent logic is that the poor and the weak deserve to die, the so-called survival of the fittest, the survival of the fittest.
European aristocrats, in order to avoid the contamination of their pure-blood lineage by inferior races, had a special love for inbreeding.
Beginning with plato in ancient Greece, noble purebred people were united with each other, inbreeding within the ruling class, and the result was generational deterioration.
Look at how similar and beautiful we are
Even animals knew that inbreeding should not be inbreeded, and the European aristocracy played like this for many years and occupied the moral high ground.
In modern times, Hitler's massacre of Jews was also in the name of exterminating the inferior Jewish people.
Now that the banner of racism has not been moved, the Western elite's contempt for the so-called inferior has changed. That is, coexisting with the virus and relying on the virus to identify the advantages and disadvantages of others.
If the new crown kills you, you can only blame you for being weak. You don't have any money, maybe this is life. Who else can blame, willing to gamble and lose.
Aren't these ways of thinking the ghosts of Plato and Malthus scattered?
On cultural inheritance, the "immortal bird" of Western culture is really worthy of its name.
Isn't it logical that the responsibility that the new crown cannot control, traced back to ancient Greece, blame Plato?