The China Writers Association announced a list of 944 members to be developed, and Jia Qianqian, the daughter of Jia Pingwo, appeared in the list.
↓
So this news rushed to the hot search, and Jia Qianqian was questioned by many netizens.
↓
The China Writers Association said: All are reviewed and reported in accordance with the procedures.
↓
But this statement did not calm the controversy. As early as January 2021, literary critic Tang Xiaolin published an article titled "Tang Xiaolin: Jia Qianqian's Explosion of Popularity, Highlighting the Chaos in the Poetry World", in which he directly denounced his poems as "dirty and disgusting garbage words" and mocked her as "enter key branch writing". Some of The poems that Jia Qianqian had created in the past that "divide the nonsense into lines" and were mixed with "and" were immediately turned over, and they were questioned more.
The China News Service published a commentary article entitled "Literature Can Be Inherited but Not Hereditary" – "If it is to be published publicly and used as a stepping stone to 'walk the society' and 'raise seniority', public sentiment should be taken into account." There are so many grounded literary works, why are you criticized for being indecent? Literature encourages inheritance, but it should not be 'hereditary'. ”
↓
Just when everyone thought that the matter should come to an end here and that the China Writers Association needed to re-examine the list of members to be developed, a group of "literary scholars" "bravely" stood up, and they "waved the flag and shouted" for Jia Qianqian, denouncing the public.
Rong Guangqi, a member of the Chinese Modern Literature Research Association: Jia Qianqian is qualified to enter the Chinese Writers Association in terms of poetry attainment, most of the Chinese people's understanding of poetry is still stuck in ancient times, the understanding of new poetry is not deep enough, netizens are partial to the whole, Jia Qianqian has a lot of good works. Everyone's opinion of her is only because her father is Jia Pingwa, and it is not directly related to her father.
Peng Min, champion of the "Chinese Poetry Conference" and deputy director of the editorial department of the "Poetry Journal": Who has been a long-term creator, who only produces fine works in their lifetime, and does not write a few mediocre poems, bad poems or game works?
Poet and professor of the Department of Chinese of Peking University: I think she is a talented poet and a poet with development prospects. Everything can be included in poetry, don't underestimate the. To argue about her attack is a kind of inferior style, very low.
Dai Weina, a poet and scholar at the Institute of Foreign Literature of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences: She has also written some poems with a good sense of language. But the collective pleasure of the masses is like this, grasping a point of excitement and infinitely amplifying. This is the tragedy of poetry in this era. Our society does not have the patience to read a good poem, but a bad poem, everyone is interested in stepping on it.
......
I would like to ask: Dear "literary people", you are very professional, very standard, and have a lot of say, but do your understanding and study of poetry come from a unified theory and system? On the one hand, it is said that "and urine poetry" is a vulgar poem, a bad poem; On the one hand, he also said, "Everything can be included in poetry, don't underestimate the and pee." Well, this literary circle, it's really hard to understand.
To sum up, the reasons for the "literary circle" to defend it are nothing more than the following points:
First, becoming a member of the Association is not a great thing.
"The members of the Chinese Writers Association are just some kind of honorary title, there is no practical benefit, there is no salary bonus, it is just a matter of face, and Zhou Gongzi relies on family relations to enter the Jiangxi transportation system as a civil servant are two different things." The members of the Writers' Association are just a group of people who have a love of literature in common, and among these members, the level is worse than that of Jia Qianqian, and a large number of them are everywhere, so this is just a misunderstanding. ”
People who say such things are really blind and talk nonsense.
The Chinese Writers Association is a public institution at the level of the main ministry, and the chairman of the Writers Association is equivalent to the level of the main minister. At present, the Writers Association has 44 group members and 12,951 individual members, which is known as the essence of talents in the Chinese literary circle. 1.4 billion people, more than 10,000 individual members. The posts of the Writers' Association are formally organized and adopt an electoral system. Every year, the state allocates more than 100 million yuan to its finances!
When we understand the nature of the writers' association, we will understand why some people have to sharpen their heads to enter the writers' association. There is no salary bonus for members of the association, you can become a member of the association, the fame and fortune brought by it are not comparable to the salary bonus, not to mention, you can also use this as a springboard to enter the "high-end" system!
So isn't it great to be a member of the Association?
Second, the "ant people" do not understand.
A few "don't understand" -
"If the public does not understand the membership procedure of the Writers Association, they should not question it." As already described in the preceding article, the nature of the Writers' Association is that of a public institution at the ministerial level, and every penny spent is the money of the masses of the people. If this is the case, it is duty to check for the masses of the people; Select writers who are recognized by the masses of the people as favorite; Encourage them to create works that are popular with the masses; Accept the supervision of the masses of the people.
"The public does not understand poetry, and they have no ability to appreciate poetry." A few months ago, when the public questioned the illustrations, a group of "aestheticians" jumped out and accused the public of not understanding aesthetics, so don't talk nonsense. A good appearance, seemingly contemptuous of the public, showing off professionalism, has become the best means of rebuke these people for all phenomena that contradict the public perception.
You have long forgotten who the subject of literary works is; You have long forgotten who literary works serve; You have long forgotten who the literary works came from; You have long forgotten who the subject of judgment on literary works is!
You use the "double standard to the extreme diary" to express the anti-epidemic Chinese, but you do not see that you have written books and statements for the masses of the people and the unparalleled scientists of the country; Your seemingly profound language of "literature should not whitewash reality, it should expose darkness" always plays the image of a defender of the moral supremacy, but ignores the light, beauty, and hope in life.
In fact, it is the darkness in your hearts, so all you see is dark, you can't see the sunny side, you are always in Shanyin, peeping with several times the magnifying glass.
These days, Chongqing mountain fire, so many firefighters, so many volunteers, so many people, not afraid of life and death, brave retrograde. You're not going to create for them because you can't see it and you don't want to see it. Sure enough, "every time there are more slaughtered dogs, more negative hearts are readers."
In your hearts, you have long forgotten - the people!
Third, everything Jia Qianqian has nothing to do with Jia Pingwa.
Jia Pingwa, a famous Chinese writer, graduated from the Department of Literature of Northwest University, once served as a master tutor of the school, and is currently the chairman of the Shaanxi Writers Association, and won the French Fermina Literary Award and the Mao Dun Literature Prize for "Waste Capital" and "Qin Cavity" respectively.
Look at Jia Qianqian, who graduated from the same college as his father, also served as an associate professor of the school, and was also the vice chairman of the Shaanxi Youth Literature Association. The perfect inheritance of the mantle, like copy and paste.
Jia Qianqian's academic achievements are mostly related to Jia Pingwo, such as "Research on the Spiritual Relevance of Jia Pingwo Calligraphy and Painting and Literature and Art", "The Words and Meanings of Life - On Jia Pingwo's Calligraphy Creation", "Research on Jia Pingwo Painting Art in the Literary Horizon", etc. She self-deprecatingly described the thesis on the study of her father as "a classic scene in which the researcher instructs the researcher to write an article about his research".
In his literary work "My Father Jia Pingwa", he wrote unabashedly: "If I am fortunate enough to publish any books to study my father in the future, everyone must firmly believe that this is the crystallization of our joint research." ”
In December 2017, Jia Qianqian won the Poetry Award of the Shaanxi Youth Literature Award, which was sponsored by the Shaanxi Youth Literature Association, of which she herself was the vice chairman, and Yanhe Magazine, of which her father, Jia Pingwa, was the editor-in-chief.
These facts are in front of us, and everything jia qianqian has nothing to do with jia pingwo in the end, leaving it to everyone to judge for themselves.
When the literary circle stood for Jia Qianqian, they did not understand why the public was dissatisfied. They thought it was the shallowness of literary understanding; They think it's a confusion about "and"; They think it is an outlet for the "second-generation phenomenon".
In fact, the public is not dissatisfied, but disappointed.
Disappointed that the "second generation of the rich", "the second generation of officials", "the second generation of Wen" and "the second generation of stars" continue to squeeze the already narrow upward channel;
Disappointed that the second generation of mediocre ability, standing on the shoulders of their fathers, easily obtained resources that ordinary people could not get no matter how much they paid;
Disappointed that the "writers" who came from the people but no longer had the people in their hearts.