Many times you can't understand, why do the warriors always love to change with a good lineup? At the end of the game against the Grizzlies, the Warriors put together a five-man group of Curry, Poole, Wiggins, Porter, and Green. This five-man combination is really immediate, with Jackson five mistakes can not come, the Warriors' lineup is almost casually bullying the Grizzlies, all kinds of big hits, all kinds of misplaced single eating, and the defensive end is really able to withstand people, but also really can guard the inside line. But the good times did not last long, and after this lineup stopped the Grizzlies, the Warriors made a substitution again. Thompson replaced Porter, and the Warriors completed a lineup of three guards + two forwards.
To be honest, the lineup of three guards is really good in the first round, because the Nuggets do not have any height, and the Warriors' three guards even have a height advantage, but against the Grizzlies, the Warriors' three guards are not enough to see. The Grizzlies can fight, the second can run and jump, the height is not bad, most of them are front guard swingers, so the Warriors' three guards are a bit uncomfortable. Of course, the most obvious is that Morant has a great advantage when playing this lineup of warriors, and in the last quarter of the game, Morante almost picked up Poole to play, continuous roll call, completely unable to prevent, who came up who sent.
As far as Kerr's lineup layout is concerned, it is true that I want to maximize the sense of space, put out three major shooters and two forwards, the sense of space is indeed good, but today I can't pull it open, because you are not allowed. When is the warriors' best time on the contrary? There is Wiggins, Cumminga, Porter, because the Warriors' forward group is obviously superior to the Grizzlies in talent, whether it is Wiggins or Porter or Cuminga in height, this is a forward who can play the regular number four, the talent advantage is obvious, why the Grizzlies lost rebounds in the second and third quarters, that is, the Warriors' forward lineup is too capable of grabbing, and the Grizzlies are a little scalp tingling.
So the problem is, first of all, Curry's point must be thunderous, it must be absolutely left on the field, and it must be played by a large margin, and the rest is the problem between Poole and Thompson. Poole is now a strong and bad point, the advantage is that the offense is excellent, the ability to hold the ball to create opportunities is also excellent, but the disadvantage is very simple, the defense pulls the crotch, almost the Warriors' worst defensive player. And Thompson is more obvious, expecting him to defend Morant is unrealistic, can score three points Thompson is infinitely large, the upper limit is infinitely high, but can not enter the three points is an infinite iron, there is no end, two games Thompson has 38 shots 11.
In the face of the Grizzlies, the Warriors can't be too small, the three-guard lineup can't be on the floor for a long time, and the Warriors should still use the forward combination, and even say that it is to add a certain amount of playing time to Cumming, so that Cuminga partners Green, Wiggins, and other players can play a little longer, and when necessary, they can even put out the key lineup of two guards + three forwards. Although Thompson and Poole are good, but now the two have too much playing time, especially Thompson is almost the player with the most playing time for the Warriors in every game, and the number of shots This thing Thompson will not deliberately control, throwing is Tang Shen, and can't shoot rebounds.