On April 22, Beijing time, the CBA Finals are about to usher in the second game of the showdown, and the Liaoning men's basketball team is currently leading 1-0. Just after the end of the first game, the CBA official selected the latest finals MVP ranking through the formula, and Liaoning substitute Fu Hao was far ahead and would have the opportunity to win the first finals MVP of his career.
According to the CBA's official formula selection rules, the selection of the finals MVP needs to look at the individual average performance quality index score (SPR), and after the first game of the finals, the top of the list is substitute Fu Hao, whose quality score is 10.5 points, far exceeding the other players in the team. Liaoning star Guo Allen finished second on the team with 6.9 points. This means that Fu Hao is far ahead in the FMVP selection.
If in the remaining finals matches, Guo Allen can not catch up with Fu Hao in this quality score, or the minimum point difference is reduced to less than 1 point, then Guo Allen will not qualify for the finals MVP. In the first game of the finals, Guo Allen scored 24 points, 7 rebounds, 4 assists and 2 steals on 11 of 21 shots, and was the only player in the game to score 20+ points, while Fu Hao scored 16 points and 6 rebounds on the bench and shot 7 of 11.
It is worth noting that the first season of the CBA's official use of formula selection encountered controversy, that is, the 20-21 season of last season, when Guangdong defender Hu Mingxuan won the finals MVP, and his final average score was 6.2 points per game, ranking second, 0.8 points less than the first Zhou Peng, because the point difference was within 1 point, so it depended on the total score of the individual. Just when Hu Mingxuan's personal total score in the finals was 41 points, Zhou Peng was 39 points, for which Hu Mingxuan lifted the trophy.
At the press conference after Guangdong won the championship, coach Du Feng directly stressed at the press conference that the MVP of the finals in his mind was veteran Zhou Peng, and in addition to being blunt, it was not objective to comment on the way the CBA formula was selected.
Now, the way the CBA's official formula is selected will once again cause controversy, and I believe that once the final finals MVP is won by Fu Hao, instead of Guo Allen, the CBA official will only attract more criticism.
This controversy has led to the evaluation of many netizens who pay attention to the CBA League, which can be said to be bashing: "The selection mechanism is too rigid, on the surface is to prevent players from brushing data, and actually formulated another set of data-only theory mechanisms, and then completely abandon the things outside the data on the court from the system, and these data are also an important part of the wonderful games and the attention of fans." CBA companies do not have to show how much effort they have in setting rules, and the satisfaction of the masses is the best evaluation. ”
From an objective point of view, the CBA league official set of rules is too rigid, did not play the correct selection role, thoroughly formulaized selection awards are difficult to convince the public, if you want to be more objective and fair, it should follow the NBA's way of selecting All-Star players, divided into multiple parts of the vote, in addition to the fan vote, the voting and discussion of the coaches of each team can also determine the selection, more objective!
(Lin Xiaoxiang)