On April 17, Beijing time, the Chinese Basketball Association spent only two days to investigate, officially announced the results of the investigation and punishment of the "match-fixing storm" in Shanghai VS Jiangsu, determined that the two teams played negatively, and issued "the heaviest fines in CBA history" to both teams. The heavy punishment of the basketball association quickly rushed to the hot search list, and the top ten lists accounted for four, but also once again triggered the continuous heated discussion of public opinion, undoubtedly so two "match-fixing" has seriously harmed the CBA league, not only caused the whole network abuse, but also led to the playoff market in recent days sluggish, Shanghai home ticket rarely snatched tickets, even Shenzhen home stadium is also affected by the discount of tickets, and the serious damage to the league image, I am afraid that it is not possible to eliminate the impact for a while.
For the series between Shanghai and Jiangsu in the 12-8 stage of the playoffs, the two sides were negative games in the G2 and G3 battles, of which the Shanghai G2 game directly rotated Wang Zhelin, and sent the whole Chinese class to release water in the second half, and Jiangsu G3 played 5 crazy errors in the last 97 seconds, allowing Shanghai to take the game 10-0 away.
In response to such two "match-fixing", the Chinese Basketball Association issued heavy penalties, finding that Shanghai and Jiangsu were both negative in their matches and seriously violated the spirit of sports, so they both disqualified the two teams from this season and participated in the competition, and both were fined 5 million yuan, Li Chunjiang was disqualified as a coach within five years, and Li Nan was disqualified for three years.
The heavy penalty of the Chinese Basketball Association is extremely severe and rapid, and it is also the hot search list of the fire line to open the hegemony mode, and it has triggered heated discussions in public opinion again:
CBA officials wrote four requirements, "CBA companies and clubs will deeply learn lessons, all league participants must firmly establish correct values, honor and disgrace, conscientiously abide by national laws, regulations and league management systems, further create a clean league environment, and make unremitting efforts to create a satisfactory event for the people." ”
Yao Ming responded in an interview: "It was a painful weekend, both clubs have a long history, the history of Jiangsu can be traced back to the first year of the league, both teams have produced milestones, the more we talk about it, the more sad we feel." In the process of investigation, we relied on the professional strength of various departments and bureaus of the State General Administration of Sports, in order to have a very rigorous factual basis to help us make a decision. For sports competitions, the most important thing is credibility, not even competence. Our lesson is profound, and we need to change something through this incident to make the price paid worthwhile. ”
Media person Mito Thorn wrote: "I said, 'History tells us that such a team does not end well in the end. But I'm more distressed." ”
"The impact on the league is far-reaching, the fans are heartbroken, they don't love it, that's the worst end. Don't want to say anything more. Alas! ”
Media person Mai Suifeng wrote: "This is undoubtedly the heaviest fine in the history of Chinese basketball, I really did not expect to be fined so heavily at the level of coaches and general managers, almost, almost let the four people mentioned in the announcement completely leave Chinese basketball." This is also an attitude of the superiors, hoping that the heavy penalty can save some fans' confidence in Chinese basketball. The rivers and lakes are far away, and they are all well! ”
Basketball commentator Wang Meng wrote: "The heaviest punishment in history! ”
"There is nothing new in the world!"
"But the world is different."
The media person wrote differently: "The heaviest fine in CBA history. The careers of both coaches should have ended there, but that match was ultimately only characterized as a negative match... ”
Media person director I lie down where I wrote: "Leading Guangdong to win 7 CBA championships, and exiting with such an ending, Chunjiang, you are really confused." ”
Media person Shao Huaqian explained the reaction to the ticket:
First, at the level of the basketball association, the characterization of "negative games" is already the top level, and the basketball association cannot determine whether these games are so-called "match-fixing", which must be characterized by the public security department, of course, if they check.
Second, the last negative game of the Chinese basketball agreement was the 2016 NBL Finals, and the penalty given at that time was "Guizhou Senhang reduced the club's league expenses by 400,000 yuan; Zhang Guodong, the head coach of Guizhou Senhang, seriously warned and reported criticism. Anhui Wenyi seriously warned and circulated criticism; The NBL league organizer, Beijing Enpio Sports Management Co., Ltd. (NBL), reported criticism. "Compared with the two, the punishment has become staggering. Of course, we have learned to "connect with the context" since elementary school, so today, football is like a thing, CBA fines are not very impossible.
The third is that I personally can't understand, the same is a negative competition, why is Li Chunjiang fined 5 years and Li Nan fined 3 years? On the general manager's side, why Shi Lingjie 5 years and Jiang Yusheng 3 years? It's all negative matches, what is the difference between the 4 people?
Fourth, sigh, if it were not for the last round of the regular season Shanghai Hammer North Control, the point difference was almost 50 points and the foreign aid was left on the field, there might not have been a conflict between Ma Yong and Blood Cloth (Bledsoe), and there would not have been two consecutive negative games in the future.
I can understand Chunjiang's special feelings for Lao Ma (Marbury), but personality determines fate, which may be the case.
Media person Wu Wei posted the disciplinary guidelines for the 2022-2023 CBA league season and wrote: "This is punished for manipulating the game. ”
Basketball reporter Jia Lei: "Shanghai Jiushi has invested so much in recent years, and has always wanted a championship. But now, the money has become a joke. The origin of all this matter has to be traced back to the last game of the regular season, and Jiushi still used the main force to fight to the death when he was thirty or forty points ahead of Beikong, which eventually caused Bradsoe to be banned for punching impulsively. ”
"If it weren't for the Beikong led by Marbury in that game, I believe the Shanghai team would not have been so ruthless, and there would be no idea and follow-up in order to consume the number of bloody matches, and the Jiangsu team would have been dragged into the water." Everything is like dominoes that create a butterfly effect. But there is no if..."
Media person Zhu Yanshuo concluded: "When the Chinese Basketball Association was punished, generally speaking, fans and media colleagues felt that the punishment was very heavy, at least satisfied. There are still many questions that need to be clarified.
First, judging from the results of the punishment, each hit 5 million big boards, but it is not clear who took the lead in proposing this matter. The whole process, whether it was a tacit ball or what, I don't know the CBA's findings. Both teams were fined by the general manager and the head coach, but what if it was the owner? Is 5 million a serious warning? "Negative play" sounds good, and this penalty is the penalty for match-fixing.
Second, Li Nan and Li Chunjiang are basically finished playing. Before, I saw someone say how reluctant Li Nan was... Yunyun, don't be silly. It's a kind of thing I'd rather quit than do it, and he didn't refuse. You can call him weak, but you can't say innocent. Li Chunjiang even if there is no such thing, the Shanghai team can really retire like that.
Third, the CBA should also crack down on this phenomenon, and I believe this is not the first time. It's just that this time it's in the playoffs, and it's so bad that the thief still has "I'm a thief" written on his face, so bother, the next time you want to act, just act like a little. ”
The sports big V basketball circle is the origin analysis: "Looking at the meaning of the report, it should be that Li Chunjiang and Shi Lingjie are the masterminds, and Jiang Yusheng and Li Nan are informed and involved, so Li Shi and the two are five years." According to the league charter, this punishment is actually not a top punishment, otherwise it can also impose a fine of 5 million on individuals, and the club can recover up to all league funds (about 30 million), restrict foreign aid, penalty draft picks and so on. It's probably because there's really no money involved, it's just a favor transaction. ”
Shanghai overseas aid Bradsoe also wrote, "They really disqualified us from the playoffs, speechless. But the source of everything is undoubtedly the chain reaction caused by Bradsoe's conflict at the end of the regular season and his suspension for four games.
……
There is no doubt that the heavy fines of the Chinese Basketball Association and the four requirements put forward by the CBA officials are all to save the CBA's league image to the greatest extent, but the bad impact obviously caused by it can not be eliminated in a moment. This year's CBA has experienced the withdrawal of the Xinjiang men's basketball team, and now the negative competition turmoil between Shanghai and Jiangsu has greatly damaged the impact of the league, and how to save the image of the league and regain the recognition of fans in the future will be a long way off.