With the birth of the realme mobile phone brand, it has indeed caused a lot of impact on the low-end market, directly making many models without the main cost performance lose their glory, and also let consumers understand that if they want to stand on their feet, only if they do not shrink and have enough sincerity.
However, in addition to the realme mobile phone, the honor mobile phone is not idle, and its honor X30 is not low in the thousand yuan market, which also makes many users feel good about it.
Then, when the realme Q5 is officially released, it is indeed worth comparing with the glory X30, at least the price is almost the same, one 1399 yuan, one 1499 yuan, so there is not much to say, see if after the comparison, will choose to tangle.
Differences in design:
Last year's realme Q3 series brought a very peculiar color scheme, and this year is the same, such as the streamer pattern illusion design, which can show different orange colors at different angles.
Moreover, the lens part is also very harmonious, although it is a matrix design, but the two sensors are symmetrically arranged up and down, and the other 2 million lens is located in the middle of the two.
Honor X30 does not have many surprises on the back of the fuselage, but the titanium empty silver (star ring version) color matching, under the silver back shell, you can see a faint pink coating hidden.
Moreover, the lens part adopts a very recognizable star ring design, which is very similar to the Honor Magic3 series and the Honor Magic4 series, which can also be regarded as a disguised enhancement of the recognition of the product itself.
Differences in screen materials:
Since the gradual popularization of OLED screen materials, manufacturers have begun to give up, but realme Q5 uses a 6.62-inch 120Hz LCD variable speed gaming screen, 2412x1080 FHD+ resolution.
At the same time, the screen itself also has 30Hz/48Hz/50Hz/60Hz/90Hz/120Hz 6-speed intelligent variable speed high brush, intelligent switching refresh rate, to avoid the power consumption caused by continuous high brushing.
The front of the Honor X30 features a 6.81-inch centered single-cut-out LCD screen that supports a refresh rate of up to 120Hz and a touch sampling rate of 240Hz. It also adds intelligent dynamic frame rate adjustment, which automatically adjusts the switching refresh rate for different scenes.
Differences in core configuration:
In terms of hardware, the difference between the two mobile phone products is very small, both are equipped with Snapdragon 695 processors, but this processor is the first launch of honor X30.
To put it simply, snapdragon 695 belongs to the upgrade of snapdragon 690, and the specific parameters have been upgraded to 2 *2.2GHz A78 large core + TSMC n6 process + Adreno 619, supporting millimeter wave and Sub-6GHz.
There will be no pressure in daily use, and mainstream games can run smoothly, but if you want to play large games, it is not particularly recommended, after all, the price is placed here, and it is difficult to increase it by a large margin.
Differences in taking photos:
In order to meet the basic needs of users, realme Q5 is equipped with a 50 million main camera F1.8 aperture; portrait lens 2 million pixels, F2.4 aperture; macro lens 2 million pixels, F2.4 aperture, with super night function, can cover most of the use of the scene.
Honor X30 is also not ambiguous, equipped with 48 million main camera + 2 million depth of field + 2 million macro, while with AI intelligent optimization, punch card mode, party mode, antique mode super macro and other functions.
If you go out, the speed of scanning the code with mobile phone products will naturally be very fast, and you can easily meet when taking photos every day, and there will be no blurry situation.
The difference between battery life and functions:
In order to meet the user's long-term use, the battery capacity of the realme Q5 is 5000mAh, supports 60W fast charging, and the official says that 48 minutes can be charged to 100%.
Honor X30 is more aggressive, with a built-in battery capacity of 4800mAh, support for 66W super fast charging, 30 minutes can be charged to 81%, and it takes only 43 minutes to fully charge.
At the same time, at the software level, it also supports GPU Turbo X and LINK Turbo X, as well as smart operation and storage expansion.
That is to say, the main products of the two products are long endurance experience, users who have special needs in this area, or can be considered, because the thousand yuan price segment can actually choose the machine is not bad, some machines are biased towards performance, but the corresponding in the battery life.
So the question is, after the above comparison, how will you choose? Welcome to the discussion.