Two domineering centers: Barty and Drogba, who do you think has the stronger comprehensive ability?
If I say god of war > Andy Lau, do you believe it?
Of course, you can say that Andy Lau of Africa was also a magic beast at that time, and his ball-making ability and tactical value were very high, however, I green watched the ball and always insisted on saying that as a center, scoring goals is always the top priority.
Unless your shooting is not stable enough, you will brag about "pivot" or "tactical value".
unbelief? Let's look at the best teams in football history, like Ronaldo, Van Basten, Romario or Gad mueller, who can have such a high historical status in football, relying on shooting, not fulcrum.
On the other hand, Benzema's early fulcrum role was very strong, but the status of football was not as good as in the past two years, why?
Because when Benzema was young, his shooting skills were not as good as they are now, so his Ballon d'Or ranking was not as good as it is now.
Seems a bit off-topic? Well, let's get back to business.
Batistuta and Drogba are both powerful centre-forwards, but they play in completely different ways.
Barty is physically strong, has a strong assault ability, and shoots in a variety of ways, such as long-range shots, headers, pad shots, barbs, free kicks... Don't forget, in each version of the football game, Barty's various shooting abilities (including shooting strength, shooting accuracy and shooting skills) are almost all full marks.
That said, in terms of the shooting link, Barty is a perfect shooting machine.
Drogba is of course also very powerful, the Monster is tall, explosive and bouncing, and the ability to hold the ball on his back is the historical level in football.
Drogba can both head the ball in the penalty area and participate in the organization and scheduling outside the box.
Moreover, Andy Lau's frontcourt rebound ability is also very strong, and he can support his teammates behind him in various ways.
Both Barty and Drogba are physically strong, and the difference between the two is that Barty is the type of "pointing straight forward", while Drogba is more accustomed to "backing up teammates".
Barty has always maintained a super high goal rate in Boca, Fiorentina, Roma and Argentina, Drogba is also a hero of the Champions League and Premier League at Chelsea, some people say that Barty will only shoot, Androba is worth more than Barty in any team, do you believe?
I don't believe it!
Drogba is good at using his back-back ability to cover Lampard's scoring, and he is indeed a good fit for Mourinho's Chelsea, however, I can also say that if Drogba has barty's scoring ability, Chelsea do not need Lampard as the attacking core at all, why don't they let the center directly complete the scoring? Do you think it's fun to brush up on Lampard?
The reason is simple, Drogba's shooting skills and comprehensive ability can not be the core of Chelsea's attack.
Andy Lau is the perfect frontcourt bridgehead, the hub of Chelsea's attack, and Barty, an all-round scorer, with Barty on the floor, does not need midfielders to complete the "Terminator" task - even in Rome, the core of the center Barty's attack is before the forward Totti.
Moreover, in terms of the fulcrum effect, even if Drogba is more obvious, it has not reached the point where the fulcrum effect can beat Barty's two grades, right?
As for archery, Barty is really two notches ahead of Drogba.
That said, Batistuta's approach to playing is more like driving the attacking core of an entire team than the midfielder's deputy.
Barty, on a platform like Florence, has not won the championship and can be ranked third in the world footballer of the year and fourth in the Ballon d'Or.
It is no wonder that Manchester United boss Alex Ferguson and International Milan boss Moratti have both said that "loyalty will make Barty miss the Ballon d'Or".
Drogba, on the other hand, has never reached such heights.
Whether it's looking at comprehensive ability or the historical position of football, Barty > Drogba, no suspense, do you agree? Welcome to discuss together.