The primary and secondary school language textbooks in each country are very cautious, mainly because the recipient is a blank piece of paper, the worldview has not yet been formed, and if the textbook knowledge is not correct, it is likely to affect the child's thinking.
Every text our children learn is a classic, and artistic achievement and ideological height should be second to none. Of course, with the passage of time, it is also normal for the text to be changed, for example, in the past period of time, There were more words in Mesie, and now it is slowly corrected, which is very necessary.
When I was a freshman in high school, I felt that the text of "Lotus Pond Moonlight" was very beautiful, and the metaphorical synaesthesia anthropomorphism and other techniques made me feel that Mr. Zhu Ziqing was a master of writing, and let me cross the reverie of the leaves of the lotus pond standing on the edge of the lotus pond facing the field.
Because I liked it, now I have a back to the passage "On the winding lotus pond, looking at the leaves of the field..." Backwards, they have become the classic lines in my memory.
A few years ago, I saw the original version of an article that introduced this article, and I learned that the version I read when I was reading was actually deleted from the eight words describing lotus leaves: "Like a beauty who just came out of the bath."
I don't know why these words disappeared from the texts when I was reading, of course, I didn't know them at that time.
I just think it's a bit of a pity, using the "beauty who just came out of the bath" metaphor for lotus flowers, these flowers out of the water hibiscus, extremely natural and appropriate, very prominent lotus pure and lovely, it and "pearls", "stars" constitute a series of metaphors, the sense of layering is stronger, richer; It reads better.
In recent years, the original source has been cleared, the texts have returned to the true face of the writer, and "like the beauty who just came out of the bath" has once again been honored in the textbook and restored its original appearance, I believe that the return of these words has gone through a struggle of thought by the editors of the textbook.
The word is restored, but how does the teacher teach it?
Most of the teachers of UNESCO have experienced the alternating texts of the old and the new, and it used to be easy to say, but now they really feel that they have encountered problems. I remember that at the lesson preparation meeting, several respected teachers put forward, these words careful analysis seems unhealthy, easy to induce children to wanton associations, affect children's learning, leading to early love and so on.
So what do you mean by these words? To speak or not to speak? The discussion could not be resolved, and everyone tacitly agreed. Privately, most of the teachers passed by and directly ignored it.
The teacher was vague and did not say, now there is actually a "lotus pond moonlight", the reason guessed it, or because of the words "like a beauty who just came out of the bath"!
According to some data, the influence of "Lotus Pond Moonlight" in the history of Chinese literature is unprecedented, which has attracted Mr. Ye Shengtao, Mr. Yu Guangzhong and others to raise objections to the quotations or rhetorical techniques in the text, which can attract the attention of many literary giants, which shows its high status.
When the teacher was confused, some parents felt the same way, and they began to sit still. Some parents made statements asking that Zhu Ziqing's "Lotus Pond Moonlight" be deleted from the textbook, or that the words should be deleted. They think that those few words, a little S, are not appropriate, and it is easy for children to have bad associations, which will bring bad and biased children.
Alas, it is not necessary. Now children, the Internet to see more than you think, some pop-up window small advertisements are far more dirty than these words, if you worry about students to understand the meaning of those words, then it is recommended that the junior high school physiological hygiene class or do not open, there are also physiological structure content, is not more intuitive?
Man's mind is dirty, and everything he sees is dirty. Some people just see the fibrin hand and make up for it in people's clothes, but children may not. Adults care about such a sentence, perhaps they have already dismissed it. Many times, adults have not yet entered the world of children, and looking at criticism from the moral high ground may become a joke. A few words are a big deal, there is no need.
After deletion, it was changed back, and after changing back, it was asked to be deleted, repeatedly, for fear that students would read it and think about it, which would have a negative impact and negative effect, which was not naïve. Doing everything possible to "block", or pretending to turn a blind eye, or directly deleting, is actually the subjective imagination of adults themselves, and perhaps children do not think so. Education must also be bravely faced, and it is necessary to restore the content of famous masters to their original appearance, but it is necessary to study individual words and phrases too carefully, on the one hand, the lack of self-confidence in education, the excessive protection of parents for their children, but also reflects the thinking of teachers, and it is also necessary to keep up with the times.
Classics are classics, which have endured through the ages, and it is so moving to read.
What do you think of the fact that the words "like a beauty who just came out of the bath" have been repeatedly entangled? Do you mind if your child reads these words? Welcome to exchange!
#语文 #