Senior Ukrainian officials recently shouted to China. According to the Global Network news on March 20, an adviser to the Office of the President of Ukraine said that China should follow the West to launch sanctions against Russia. Advisers to the President's Office of Ukraine believe that the West is a civilized world, and China should participate in sanctions against Russia and maintain the security order led by the United States, Britain and other Western countries. Advisers to the president's office also called for the West to show China the difference between $1.6 trillion and $150 billion. The former is the volume of trade between China and the West, and the latter is the volume of trade with Russia.
In these remarks, the demand that China choose a side between the West and Russia is obvious, and the ukrainian officials also hinted that if China chooses the wrong choice, it may bear the loss of breaking with the Western economy. However, I am afraid that how the Chinese side behaves does not need to be demanded by high-ranking Ukrainian officials. On the Ukraine issue, China's position has always been clear and resolute, that is, to follow the context of the matter itself and seek to solve it at the source.
The Chinese foreign minister, the Chinese ambassador to the United States, and the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson have successively stated China's position that the easing of the situation in Ukraine requires mutual respect rather than mutual accusations, and what is needed is to face up to their respective security concerns rather than unilaterally take sides in sanctions.
For some time now, with the delay in achieving its goals in the Situation in Ukraine, the United States has begun to frequently use its hegemonic influence to slander and slander China's position on the Situation in Ukraine. In forcing China to take sides, the United States has presented a coordinated situation of intelligence chain, media chain, and diplomatic chain, and has endorsed us us credit as an endorsement, which is manifested as an overall public opinion war against China.
In the situation in Ukraine, the mainstream media in the United States has repeatedly quoted the words of anonymous US intelligence officials to throw dirty water on China, and the United States has also encouraged allies to collectively exert pressure on China, but because the United States cannot give evidence or the cost of fabricating evidence is too high, the US remarks have attracted more and more suspicions from allies. When the US defense secretary visited Bulgaria in recent days, such an embarrassing scene occurred, outside the building where the US defense minister visited, demonstrators gathered and chanted the slogan "NATO get out". A United States that uses its neighbor as a tool and its allies as a tool is bound to attract more and more opposition.
Recently, in addition to asking Poland to provide Soviet-made fighters to Ukraine, the United States also asked Turkey to provide S-300 or S-400 air defense systems to Ukraine, of course, the United States has proved with actual actions that the relevant actions need to be "Turkey to provide air defense systems to Ukraine", not "the United States to provide Turkish air defense systems to Ukraine". On the one hand, the United States has made it clear that it will never jump into the fire pit of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, and on the other hand, it has constantly pushed other countries to jump into the fire pit, which is neither responsible nor moral.
The Russian Ministry of Defense recently disclosed a shocking news, a personnel of the Ukrainian State Security Agency who surrendered to the Russian side confirmed that the Azov battalion planned to attack the diplomatic institutions of Western countries in western Ukraine and intended to blame Russia. Is the US side aware of this information?
The United States continues to try to push China, India, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia and other countries into the fire pit, and the United States even intends to spread the war to the NATO country of Poland. The impact of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict on the world is enormous, and its further fragmentation of the already fragmented global political and economic situation following the COVID-19 pandemic is not in the interests of the vast number of countries around the world that want to develop. A turbulent and fragmented global situation is obviously conducive to financial plunder and to individual countries to use their stock advantages in self-chaos to make profits.
Under the circumstance that the curtain of the new Cold War provoked by the United States and Britain is lifted, the world needs an anchor for stability and development, and the unilateral confrontation led by the United States and Britain is by no means the mainstream, and development is the common voice of most countries in the world.