laitimes

Is the genius saying exaggerated? Compared with Nie Weiping, Ma Xiaochun was not at all on the same level

author:Apricot Grove Yike

Nie Weiping and Ma Xiaochun both made great contributions to the development of Chinese Go, breaking the myth of Japan's super-first-class invincibility and rising the Go fever in the land of China. One for Chinese Go broke the embarrassment of world championship zero. Some people think that Ma Xiaochun is powerful, after all, Ma Xiaochun's record of Nie Weiping is leading, and some people think that Nie Weiping is powerful, so who is strong in the end? I believe that on this point, many people feel that Ma Xiaochun is a little more powerful, but at this point, Ma Xiaochun and Nie Weiping are not a rank at all.

Is the genius saying exaggerated? Compared with Nie Weiping, Ma Xiaochun was not at all on the same level

Ma Xiaochun's chess talent is the second in the world, is it true or exaggerated?

So which one is it? That's the result for Japanese chess players.

Is the genius saying exaggerated? Compared with Nie Weiping, Ma Xiaochun was not at all on the same level
Is the genius saying exaggerated? Compared with Nie Weiping, Ma Xiaochun was not at all on the same level

Since the beginning of the Sino-Japanese Go Tournament, Chinese chess players and Japanese chess players have more opportunities to fight, and Nie Ma, as a leading figure, inevitably clashes with Japanese chess players, so how are the two of them doing against Japanese chess players? Let's give an example. Because Nie Weiping only participated in ten ring matches, Nie Ma compared the time from 1984 to 1995.

Is the genius saying exaggerated? Compared with Nie Weiping, Ma Xiaochun was not at all on the same level

Nie Weiping won a total of 14 wins and 4 losses, did not play twice, and ended the game three times. Ma Xiaochun won a total of 8 wins and 6 losses, did not participate in the sixth ring, did not play in the fifth and ninth rounds, and ended the ring once. Putting aside the results of the game, in terms of the number of finishes, Nie Weiping is obviously superior.

Is the genius saying exaggerated? Compared with Nie Weiping, Ma Xiaochun was not at all on the same level

Judging from the chess players who lost, Nie Weiping lost to four chess players, Nameng Hane Taisho, Masao Kato, Shuzo Awaji, and Kiki Iida. Ma Xiaochun lost to six opponents: Koichi Kobayashi, Satoshi Kataoka, Masao Kato, Noriki Ida, Shuzo Awaji, and Hideki Komatsu. After the first Ma Xiaochun lost to Koichi Kobayashi, Nie Weiping won Koichi Kobayashi. After the second defeat to Satoshi Kataoka, Nie Weiping won Satoshi Kataoka, the third Ma Xiaochun met his nemesis Masao Kato, and finally Nie Weiping took Masao Kato, and the fourth Ma Xiaochun lost to Noriki Ida, who was cut down by Nie Weiping. The seventh Ma Xiaochun and Nie Weiping all lost to Shuzo Awaji. The eighth Ma Xiaochun was defeated by The Japanese stalwart Hideki Komatsu, but Nie Weiping blocked Hideki Komatsu. The ninth tournament was ended by Cao Dayuan, and Nie Ma did not appear. In the tenth competition, Ma Xiaochun defeated the hero of Otake to end the game, and Nie Weiping did not appear.

Is the genius saying exaggerated? Compared with Nie Weiping, Ma Xiaochun was not at all on the same level

Looking back now, in the ring, Ma Xiaochun lost to five chess players, all of which were subdued by Nie Weiping and Nie Weiping. In addition, Ma Xiaochun's record against Masao Kato, Hero Otake, Koichi Kobayashi, and Masaki Takemiya, four Japanese chess players, was not good, and Nie Weiping had been able to form a strong opponent for these four, so in terms of playing against Japanese chess players, Ma Xiaochun and Nie Weiping were not at the same level at all.

Is the genius saying exaggerated? Compared with Nie Weiping, Ma Xiaochun was not at all on the same level
Is the genius saying exaggerated? Compared with Nie Weiping, Ma Xiaochun was not at all on the same level

Finally, there is the nema scramble. Go is the sport with the greatest age relationship in the competitive sports world. Nie Weiping is 12 years older than Ma Xiaochun, in early 1992, Ma Xiaochun defeated Nie Weiping in the Hong Kong China Chess King Challenge, combining celebrities, new sports cups, chess kings and other laurels, winning the "Grand Slam" of the Chinese Go Tournament, marking the entry of Chinese Go into the Ma Xiaochun era. However, at this time, Nie Weiping was already 40 years old, had already passed the peak period, and the fight with 28-year-old Ma Xiaochun was gradually in the ascendant. It is also reasonable that the Toyo Securities Cup is not inferior to Ma Xiaochun, after all, age and competitive status do not allow Nie Weiping to make another achievement. This is like li changhaozhi and Ma Xiaochun many years later, the younger ones often have the advantage, and The 11-year-old Li Changhao of The little Ma Xiaochun has become a big mountain that Ma Xiaochun can't cross. Later, the 7-year-old Gu Li became Lee Chang-ho's nemesis. That's the cruelty of competitive sports, young, with advantages. In the same way, Ma Xiaochun is 12 years old, and Ma Xiaochun naturally has an advantage.

Is the genius saying exaggerated? Compared with Nie Weiping, Ma Xiaochun was not at all on the same level

Is it reasonable that people often compare Nie Ma together? Ma Xiaochun's eldest Li Changhao is 11 years old, and he is said to be "Guan Gong Zhan Qin Qiong" together, so if you compare Nie Weiping, who is 12 years older than Ma Xiaochun, with Ma Xiaochun, is it Xiang Yu Zhan Di Qing?

In short, it is more inappropriate for them to put them together, and secondly, in terms of playing against Japanese chess players, Ma Xiaochun and Nie Weiping are not at the same level at all.

Is the genius saying exaggerated? Compared with Nie Weiping, Ma Xiaochun was not at all on the same level

Read on