laitimes

Hearthstone: Nuclear arsenal maintenance, should it be dismantled and replaced with 1600 dust? A little advice

Hearthstone's new patch is online, and the problem of the nuclear arsenal that everyone is most concerned about is settled. Gu Ying I said many times before, in fact, it is not that the designer can not design a strong single card, but because of the balance of the relationship, the strong card can not be placed in the ladder, after all, the design of the strong card is cool, back to balance overtime do not know how long to add.

Hearthstone: Nuclear arsenal maintenance, should it be dismantled and replaced with 1600 dust? A little advice

Designers are also people, even if they are a handful of the world's top card game designers, can not work overtime, who wants to work overtime? Over time, in order to reduce overtime "because of balance", it is natural to design some cards with more moderate and more general strength. Of course, the above is Gu Ying I guessed randomly, everyone figure a music on the line.

However, if you calculate according to the strength of the cards, the strongest card in hearthstone is personally considered to be Kazakushan. Then, not surprisingly, Kazakushan was weakened.

Hearthstone: Nuclear arsenal maintenance, should it be dismantled and replaced with 1600 dust? A little advice

First, the maintenance of nuclear arsenals, or not decomposition?

Since Kazakushan's battle roar is to find five treasures, and the treasure was originally something that can only be used in adventure mode. Although after entering the ladder, it is a weakened version, but even if the equivalent is a little lower, the nuclear weapon is still a nuclear weapon. So Kazakushan is Hearthstone's nuclear arsenal, and as the patches become thinner, this arsenal is maintained.

Hearthstone: Nuclear arsenal maintenance, should it be dismantled and replaced with 1600 dust? A little advice

To be precise, Kazakushan was not weakened, but the locusts in the dozens of treasure cards that could be found were deleted. Although this card is indeed a return and unlock artifact, it is far from the point where it cannot be done without this nuclear weapon. And on the good side, without the locust attack, treasures such as ragnaros' embers and the Book of the Dead would be easier to choose. Whether it is good or bad is actually difficult to say.

Second, the nuclear weapons have been maintained, so should they be dismantled?

Hearthstone: Nuclear arsenal maintenance, should it be dismantled and replaced with 1600 dust? A little advice

Although this time Kazakushan was only one of dozens of treasures weakened, the designers still let the player break it down in full in two weeks. Considering the mini bag that Kazakushan came from, for only 2000 gold coins, in addition to a large number of blue and white cards, there are four legends, which is not a loss in itself.

In this way, even if the Kazakushan is fully decomposed, it is equivalent to exchanging 2000 gold coins for three orange cards plus 1600 arcane dust, as well as a large number of blue and white cards. This matter is a steady profit.

Hearthstone: Nuclear arsenal maintenance, should it be dismantled and replaced with 1600 dust? A little advice

Of course, the most important thing is that if the Kazakushan is a nuclear arsenal, but we dismantle it, we dismantle it, and we can rebuild it at any time. So the impact is almost nothing. The current decomposition, dismantling, get 1600 arcane dust, when you want in the future, you can also reconcile and come back, this is the legendary regret medicine. Why not?

Hearthstone: Nuclear arsenal maintenance, should it be dismantled and replaced with 1600 dust? A little advice

By contrast, another weakened card called MI7 Smuggler is less attractive. It is a white card in itself, strengthening or weakening, no one cares, it is really a bit miserable.

Third, a little advice on mini packages and full decomposition

Finally, regarding the mini bag, Gu Ying's personal opinion is to wait and see first, as long as the intensity is not too outrageous, there are one or two that can be used, you can start. As for the question of whether the weakened cards should be fully decomposed, my views are also very unified. When it comes to full decomposition, the cards after it are weakened are useful or useless, and they are all decomposed.

After all, if you decompose first, you will want to come back later, and there is a regret drug; but when it is fully decomposed, there is no decomposition, and there is no regret medicine. How to choose, it should be obvious, right?

Read on