At the time of the release of Win11, a particularly eye-catching feature is that it can support Android applications, but now the small partners who are using Win11 know that it is actually not supported by default (but it can be supported through very complex settings and cracking). Until recently, the version that supports Android apps by default has been confirmed to be online, but small partners who are playing Win11 should pay attention to the fact that its configuration requirements have increased! Is your configuration still coping? Check it out.

To say that Microsoft is a bit "back off" and upgraded the configuration requirements of Win11, it is actually not very appropriate. If you refer to the Windows 11 system requirements released on Microsoft's official website, you will find a more eye-catching prompt at the end: "Some functions require specific hardware support." ", the direct drop-down page will also see some enhancements to the functionality. In addition, the need to boot from UEFI and TPM 2.0 modules actually limits the CPU to newer products, and it is really not a 1GHz CPU.
Looking at the configuration improvement this time, you will also see that it is explained that "if you want to use the mobile APP, you need to meet the following configuration", in theory, if you do not use the mobile APP, then the previous configuration is completely fine. As for the improvement of memory and storage requirements, in fact, the core is still on the CPU, and the specific reason is that Win11 can be compatible with Android APP, which is actually based on Intel's Bridge technology.
So what is Bridge technology? In fact, as can be seen from the name, it is a "bridge" connecting Android applications and x86 applications, the official statement is "runtime post-compiler), which can allow mobile applications to run in the form of 'native applications' on x86-based devices, including running on Windows", which is a hardware virtual function.
As for Intel itself, because it has previously launched an Android processor based on x86, it is used in some tablets and mobile phones such as Lenovo K900, although there are some criticisms, but it is completely fine to use it in the later stage. Now the newer Core directly integrates similar x86-Android virtual features completely fine.
As for the AMD Ryzen™ processor, it may be because there is no hardware virtual so it needs more high performance to software simulation, or a later model to integrate similar hardware, in short, the Ryzen™ 2000 platform that originally met the requirements of the Win11 configuration cannot meet the demand, and the Ryzen™ 3000 series needs to be updated. The increase in memory and storage requirements is obviously also because Android applications actually use hardware virtual machines in the system, which of course requires stronger hardware configuration.