At 1:00 a.m. Beijing time on February 21, the 26th round of the 2021-22 Serie A season, Inter Milan hosted Sassuolo. In the first half, Raspadori and Skamaca scored successively, and in the second half, Devere missed a one-handed opportunity, and in injury time, Devry scored with a header, but before Di Malco handballed, the referee judged the ball invalid after watching VAR. In the end, Inter lost 0-2 to Sassuolo, failed to surpass AC Milan, who had previously drawn, and still ranked second in the table.
Many fans have raised many questions about the referee's decision in this game, believing that the referee's scale is not uniform, before Sassuolo's first goal, the other side is suspected of fouling Char Khanoglu, the referee did not award a penalty, and the video referee did not intervene. After Devere's header broke the goal, the referee looked back on the spot and ruled that the handball foul was invalid in the first goal. So let's analyze these two cases:
In the 8th minute, Charhanoglu's dribble was broken, And Maxim López broke the ball and distributed it to the advancing Berardi, who then passed the ball to Raspadori, who entered the box and scored directly with his feet.
We know that when a goal is scored, the video referee needs to check if there is a foul in the offensive stage, and if it is a clear and obvious mistake, then the video referee needs to step in. In this case, the other side stabbed the ball away from behind Char khanoglu, but from the slow motion, the other party did kick Charhan olu when he stabbed the ball, although this action is not very obvious, but we think it is more reasonable to award fouls for this ball. Therefore, the penalty goal should be invalidated and Awarded Inter to play a direct free kick where Char khanoglu was fouled.
There is also a question here, why does the VAR not intervene, we said earlier that only the clear and obvious error video assistant referee can intervene, this case is not a clear and obvious error, so the video referee is not involved is correct!
Another controversy is that Devry scored a header in injury time, and after the video referee intervened, the referee looked back and awarded Di Malco a handball foul first, and the goal was invalid!
In fact, this case is not the same above, the key is whether the handball is a handball foul, because if the Di Malco handball is unintentional, then the di Malco arm does not score immediately after touching the ball, so it should be a valid goal.
However, through slow motion we find that Di Marco's arm obviously makes the body unnaturally enlarge, and there is also a clear movement towards the ball, so this handball foul is still very obvious, so when the referee does not award a penalty, the video referee thinks that this is a clear and obvious mistake, so the intervention is correct, and the referee looks back and decides that the goal is invalid, and we think it is also correct!
What kind of views you have, welcome to leave a message in the comment area!
Click Share
Click Favorites
Thumbs up