laitimes

9am! Famous mouths sent a text to bombard the Football Association, a thousand yuan subsidy to spoil the men's football team, and the spearhead pointed directly at Chen Shuyuan

On February 20, the news that the men's football team lost to Vietnam in shame added to the fans, the women's football team won the Asian Cup, and the issue of the treatment of men's and women's football has also been mentioned many times recently. According to the outside world, although the treatment of our women's football team is now at a high level in the world, compared with the performance and treatment of men's football, fans still feel that it is not enough. Just yesterday, Wang Xiaorui, a reporter from Sports Weekly, talked about the training subsidies of men's football teams, saying that now the national team training has subsidies every day, each person is 1,000 yuan per day, before the 12 rounds is 400 yuan per day, and the earliest time was 200 yuan per person per day.

9am! Famous mouths sent a text to bombard the Football Association, a thousand yuan subsidy to spoil the men's football team, and the spearhead pointed directly at Chen Shuyuan

After seeing this news, the fans were also angry, bluntly saying that giving training subsidies to the "multi-millionaire" men's football team was simply a waste of resources. The famous commentator Han Qiaosheng also responded to this matter, he posted that the national football team lost, there is a problem of the player's own ability, the football association also has a great responsibility. The national footballer is a spoiled child of the Football Association, who treats every game as a task to complete, and can get 1000 a day if he loses anyway. From 400 to 1000 per day. 1,000 a day, 30,000 in January, this is a lot of income. In the long run, it is easy to form the concept of kicking football for money, which will lead to the win or loss of the game and not be assured. Alas, the common sense of man, habitually malfunctioning!

9am! Famous mouths sent a text to bombard the Football Association, a thousand yuan subsidy to spoil the men's football team, and the spearhead pointed directly at Chen Shuyuan
9am! Famous mouths sent a text to bombard the Football Association, a thousand yuan subsidy to spoil the men's football team, and the spearhead pointed directly at Chen Shuyuan

I have to say that Han Qiaosheng's point of view is to the point, the performance of the Chinese men's football team has plummeted, from the previous Asian second-rate all the way down to the bottom level in Asia, there is a problem of personal ability, but a variety of super-standard "treatment" is also the culprit. As Han Qiaosheng said, the daily training subsidy is now 1,000 yuan, but it was only 200 yuan before the round of 12, and it rose to 400 yuan during the period, but with the training subsidy increasing exponentially, the men's football team did not turn the incentive into a motivation to win, but lost to Vietnam. The feeling is that the more money you give, the more you lose, conveying an extremely bad value to the outside world.

9am! Famous mouths sent a text to bombard the Football Association, a thousand yuan subsidy to spoil the men's football team, and the spearhead pointed directly at Chen Shuyuan

Judging from Han Qiaosheng's statement, the spearhead has been pointed at the Football Association and Chen Shuyuan. The reason why the men's football team has fallen into today's situation is undoubtedly the culprit. Chen Shuyuan led the salary cut and salary limit in the league, so that the real football rationality returned. But at the same time, he made a fatal mistake, bringing this value of "playing for money" to the national football team, and did not insist on his "belief in football". In the past, "multi-millionaires" lacked professionalism, afraid of fighting too hard and injuring themselves to make a lot of money, and now in the context of salary arrears and salary restrictions, they have taken the selection of national football as a channel for stable "income generation". The winning subsidy is reasonable, but the loss is confused, and the subsidy has increased by 5 times, is this still reasonable?

Read on