In some recent European leagues, fiasco has become the theme of some teams, but there is no way to do this, because many teams are in the whole work, mainly the problem of single back, can also be said to be the problem of the back, from the recent games, many well-known coaches are really using a tendon in the back, but why they choose so, do not know. So now there really isn't a player who can play a single back? Why have some players recently played singles at the back, resulting in poor results for the team?
The first full-time worker was Nagelsman, Kimmich singled the back, did he think Kimmich had the ability to Ram?
Kimmich himself is not a back, he should be considered an organizational midfielder, but has a certain defensive ability of the midfielder, in fact, this is interesting, but recently Bayern is really lacking in the case of midfield, especially the lack of an all-round midfielder Goretzka, Kimmich playing the back itself is wrong, but Nagelsman believes that Kimmich is Ram, after all, the peak of Ram is playing the back, but also played a single back, but the tactics at that time, as if the back is not so important in the system. But Kimmich and Ram are really different players.
Kimmich is an offensively well-organized but defensive midfielder, and he plays midfield because he doesn't play full-backs much fast enough now, and now full-backs really demand speed. Of course, Kimmich has a good overall view, but the defensive ability is at least not top-notch, not top-notch in midfield, he plays a single back, there will be defensive problems, but it is unlikely that there will be any problems in the offensive organization. When playing Bochum, you can actually see that Kimmich really does not have any good play, that is, he can't defend, and he can't help the team midfielder intercept a lot of attacks, Ram was actually defensive and offensive organization at the top, and the technology is better. But now a lot of teams don't seem to know enough about some players, and the same is true of Kimmich. But Kimmich is good at half a back, and Manchester United's thinking is a little more unique.
McTominay hit a single back that looks like a more magical train of thought?
McTominay played a single back, which is a worse decision than Kimmich's single back, why do you say that? Scott McTominay himself is a striker, now playing in midfield, itself is an offensive midfielder, the speed of attack is his advantage, but in Manchester United's tactical system, McTominay is the core of midfield defense, but also the core of the attack conversion, but unfortunately this is a failed attempt.
Because now the back will not defend the situation, it is best to pile up two players, so that there may be a better effect, but it is also because Manchester United does not have a real back, defensive midfielders, so recently the midfield is always trying new ideas, the result is this, Manchester United has had obvious defensive problems in midfield many times this season, Lonnick also seems to want to play high pressing, this is the result of the attempt, the team still needs to buy a back, but both teams can find a problem, now want to play a single back, But this back is not a player who plays at the back before, is not very interesting.
The last one is atletico, Simeone's recent problem is getting Cork to play singles at the back, especially in many games
Kork itself should be a good all-round player, but the attack should be their own strength, this season's Atletico is Koke's idea, is to let him play the back, many games look like playing a single back, this is obviously a challenge, the result is that Atletico has failed many times, even fiasco, Koke playing a single back is one of the biggest problems, although this team's backline is still problematic, but perhaps Simeone thinks that Cork is an all-round player, after getting older, position retreat is the best choice.
This may be the thinking of many coaches, Messi is now also a bit of a retreat, but from all recent games, Cork playing a single back is not as good as playing a real midfield, or even not playing a back in a double-back formation, so not every player who has played on the wing or attacked the midfield before can retreat when he is old, but atletico's problem is not only a single back problem, there are many problems with the defender line, and there are too many problems in the defender line.
So now it seems that a single back is basically impossible for many teams to achieve, and from the game point of view, a lot of defensive ability in the back of the back is really average, this is also helpless, now Kante's type of defensive midfield is basically gone, most of the midfielders are all-round, defense and offense are relatively balanced, but there are not many such players. In the future, should the double back or the choice of most people, mainly because the ability of the midfield defensive players is declining, is these three single backs the most impressive ones? Of course, these players have performed averagely in recent games, and the defense seems to have obvious problems. It's really a bit frustrating. But who of these three is worse, by and largely ranked like this, with Koch being the worst at the back, Kimmich and McTominay half a pound, and no one is better than anyone else.