In the movie "Flying Life", there is such a sentence: if you want to be fair, come to the sports competition, if you want to be absolutely fair, don't come to the sports competition. This sentence is actually very realistic, because in all sports competitions, there are referees, and the final score of the competition is partly the individual skill, and the other part is the score of the referee. The scores of the judges are subjective, so they are not accurate, they can only say that they have a high professional standard, to some extent, have greater authority, but they cannot explain absolute fairness.
In the Winter Olympics held normally today, there are actually some voices that appear, not for the rules of the competition, but for the questioning of the referees of the competition. Today, the Chinese team is in fifth place with 3 gold and 2 silver, and in the later games, we actually have our own strengths, so there is no need to worry at all. While watching the game, we certainly will not let go of a single detail, after all, only after real careful observation, can we get infinitely close to the four words of absolute fairness. Although we are the host, we have no advantage other than home field advantage.
Many people may say that the host has the blessing of the referee, at least in the subjective impression, we should get some help from the secret. But I would say that through the games of these few days, we don't have that kind of treatment. Instead, some details reveal that some referees seem to be still targeting the host. In the past few competitions, sharp-eyed netizens found a hint. First of all, in the snowboard slope skill slalom, Su Yiming played very well, but did not win the championship, only won a silver medal.
In this match, 2 Canadian referees gave low scores, but the champion was an athlete from the Canadian team. If other referees also give lower scores, they are the same, indicating that the strength is really not in place. However, in the case that the scores of other referees are not bad, only the scores of these 2 referees are low, and it just so happens that the champion is a domestic athlete, which will of course cause greater doubts, and some netizens directly say that this is the calf protector. The other game was the big jumping project from Gu Ailing, which was originally a big jump as a side event, but I didn't expect her to play so well.
But even if you play so well, you almost lost the championship. In the final of the big jump, Gu Ailing played normally in the first few jumps, although there were some small mistakes, but it did not affect the overall performance. However, in the final jump, in the case of all the referees giving Gu Ailing a higher score, the French referee gave the lowest score of 93 points. Because the champion will only be produced among Gu Ailing and French athletes, but the score that is too low must be difficult for the French referee to play, so it is two or three points lower than other referees. But we must know that in this kind of international competition, a point difference may make your champion miss the cross-arm, if it is not Gu Ailing's play is too anti-heavenly, this champion may be someone else's.
After these 2 details were revealed, it caused many netizens to discuss hotly, and many people believed that the referee should uphold the principle of fairness and relative fairness, and should not be too subjective in it. As the host, we do not have much advantage in it. I hope that in the next game, the referee can try to be objective and fair, don't be so against the host!