Two talented attack line masters, Piero and Bergkamp, who do you think is stronger?
Why should the prince be embarrassed?
"Zebra Prince" Piero is able to dominate in Juventus, and in such a big scene as the World Cup or the European Championship, it is revealed.
And the "Ice Prince" Bergkamp is not only in excellent form at Ajax and Arsenal, but also in the World Cup or the European Championship, Bergkamp can still contribute to the master performance.
With that being the case, who would dare to say that Piero was stronger than Borgkamp?
Of course, Piero's talent is still good.
He has a good sense of the ball, delicate technique at his feet, dexterous dribbling movements, and high efficiency in scoring free kicks and grabbing points in front of goal.
Piero excelled at completing a right-footed shot from the left side of the penalty area, hence the phrase "Piero's zone".
Piero can play the ninth and a half, can also play as a striker or left winger, representing Juventus in the Champions League and Serie A, was elected the top scorer of Serie A, Piero is also a member of the Italian team to win the World Cup and the runner-up of the European Championship.
The fledgling Piero, indeed full of spirit, squeezed out the old prince Baggio at Juventus, ranked in the top four of the Ballon d'Or Early, and even briefly "forced double pride" with Ronaldo in Serie A.
However, this is only the early Piero, the 1998 World Cup, Piero did not play well, wasting Baggio's efforts.
After that, Piero was injured and absent for a long time, and became a "penalty striker".
Although Piero later helped Italy win the 2006 World Cup, he was no longer the genius of the year.
In contrast, the Dutch "Ice Prince" Bergkamp has not won as many titles as Piero, however, when it comes to personal ability and playing, Bergkamp is obviously a higher grade than Piero.
Bergkamp can play both in the centre and up front, he is tall, his footwork is superb, and his imagination and creativity are amazing.
In terms of the sense of stopping the ball, few players in the history of football dare to say that they are stronger than Bergkamp.
As an artist in football, Bergkamp has excellent stopping, passing, prejudging, reading matches and shooting skills.
He can score goals at Ajax and the Netherlands, as well as perform at Arsenal.
Bergkamp's front door smells and turns around to get rid of it, full of ornamentation.
Bergkamp is a true master, not only won the Eredivisie and Premier League titles, won the Eredivisie top scorer, but also was selected for the best squads in the World Cup and the European Championship, and has also been ranked in the top three of the Ballon d'Or and the World Footballer of the Year on many occasions.
In terms of club performance, Piero and Bergkamp have their own strengths.
Piero has more titles and Bergkamp's style is more ornamental.
On the national team's play, Bergkamp hanged Piero.
Although Piero has a World Cup champion, Bergkamp's performances in previous World Cups and European Championships are quite wonderful, and there is no shortage of classic moments, is it comparable to Piero's "soft-footed shrimp"?
So, my answer is that, aside from the number of champions, Bergkamp's personal ability and playing are better than Piero's, and Bergkamp should be compared to Baggio, not Piero. What do you think about that?