By the greenwood incident, should Zuma be fired by West Ham? Which is more serious?

In one video, West Ham centre-back Zuma picks up his cat in the kitchen and throws it on the floor to kick. The video also shows Zuma punching the cat in the face.

The video is of Zuma's brother, Joan, filming animal cruelty in a £2 million mansion.

After the incident fermented, Zuma, 27, issued a statement apologizing for his actions, saying: I want to apologize for my actions. There is no excuse for my behavior, and I sincerely regret it. I would also like to express my deep apologies to anyone who is upset by this video. I want to assure you that our two cats are very healthy. They are loved and cherished by our whole family, and this act is an accidental event that will not happen again.

Since the video was released, a large number of people have criticized Zuma's behavior. Among them is goalkeeper Chris Kirkland, who has played for former Liverpool, Wigan and other teams.

In an interview with the show, Chris Kirkland said zuma's behaviour was disgusting because zuma kicked the cat and beat the cat and he should be fired by West Ham United.

Still, the local police won't investigate Zuma's case.

So, is Zuma's behaviour so serious that the club should fire him?

Recently, Manchester United's Greenwood was detained by the police on suspicion of rape, sexual assault, assault and threats of violence, and the Manchester United player was released on bail three days later, and the incident is still under investigation.

In the Greenwood incident, the beaten woman was bleeding from the corners of her mouth and the bruises on her body were still vivid.

Zuma and Greenwood, one kicked the cat and the other hit the man, but at the moment no one seems to have explicitly asked United to sack Greenwood. So, who is more serious about the behavior of these two people?