The characteristics of the multi-point origin of Chinese civilization are very headaches, Egypt is small, but also thanks to its small, and the population is almost all distributed along a large river, so that its cultural unity is very high, and very early reached the unity of the country, in such a high degree of political and cultural unity, Egyptian civilization has been stable for more than 3,000 years, so in the traceability of the origin of civilization Egypt encountered a much smaller cause than China full of stars, this can not be denied.
At the beginning of the birth of the script, there was indeed a vague area, and it had to be admitted that the Inheritance of the Egyptian script was stronger, and it was difficult for the early Chinese suspected scripts to find a clear inheritance relationship with the later Oracle, while Egypt was in the same vein. The entire Liangzhu civilization has not been born for a recognized script during the time of its existence, which loses a big proof that the Liangzhu civilization exists, that is, it is impossible to trace the source from the texts formed by later generations.
Assuming that the Liangzhu civilization lasted for 4,000 years, the first 1,000 years was the birth period of writing, that is, the so-called fuzzy zone, and the last 3,000 years of writing formed and matured, and the writing inheritance was orderly, and when tracing the origin of the text, it was found that some words and combinations of words had almost identical contrasts in the 1,000-year-old fuzzy zone, and then it was more reasonable to prove that the earliest words were born in the 1,000-year fuzzy zone.
Advantages of Liangzhu (compared to other carved symbols):
1, the number of advantages, Liangzhu is one of the most excavated symbols in China one of the culture, most of the current excavation of carved symbols in the Zhuang Tomb Bridge site, Zhuang Tomb Bridge 100,000 square meters only excavated 2,000 square meters has hundreds of cases. If it is evenly distributed, it is very likely that there will be tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of cases in the end.
2, Liangzhu symbol hyphen is very much, not only this one example. As I said earlier, the earliest Egyptian sentences were unearthed in the 28th century BC, but there were already texts before that. At present, Liangzhu already has a lot of archaeological evidence of suspected sentences, so the feasibility of it belonging to the text is very large.
3. The degree of social development of Liangzhu indicates that it at least has a similar note symbol. Liangzhu society alone requires thousands of people to work continuously for many years. It is impossible without a note symbol similar to text. In fact, archaeology has indeed found these. For example, the Liangzhu divine emblem, which in itself is a thing of the same nature as the Egyptian crown symbol, and the difference between the note symbol and the text is whether it carries the language. The difficulty of the literalization of Liangzhu symbols is here, and the number is insufficient to determine whether it carries the language.
But according to Liangzhu's standards, the formation of a unified state in Egypt did not have to wait for the first dynasty, and the evidence of the former dynasty Egypt in terms of wide areas of state was much more sufficient than that of Liangzhu. Moreover, whether it is Egypt or the two rivers, the formation of a wide area of kingship and regional states is a long process, Egypt has experienced a transition period of at least six hundred years before the complete unification of the country was truly realized during the Old Kingdom period, which was reflected in the literature of the time.
Archaeologically, this transitional period does not exist, and Egypt was a unified state from the late pre-dynastic period. This situation touches on the limitations of archaeology, and China uses cultural features and settlement relationships as evidence for regional states, underestimating the complexity of the formation of regional states.
The political system of the Xia-Shang Dynasty was very different from that of the later, for example, Qin destroyed Zhou, but Qin existed as a prince of Zhou for hundreds of years, and if the book burning pit Confucianism was thorough, and a large number of pre-Qin literature was lost, it is now likely to conclude that Zhou died early and Qin Enjoyed Zuo for hundreds of years. Before the Zhou Dynasty, not only did the Zhou Dynasty exist as a Shang prince for hundreds of years (or possibly a thousand years), but because there was no large-scale division of the children of meritorious men at the beginning of the Zhou Dynasty, many of the people and even the heads of the princely states were not the same people as the Shang Dynasty people like the Zhou people, and their beliefs were different, and their characteristics were very distinct.
Therefore, when we dig up the things of merchant civilization, we must not only prove that this belongs to merchants, but also prove that this thing was not left by merchants as princes before the Shang Tang dynasty, and that it was not left by the Song people who inherited the Shang civilization. Therefore, if what Yin Ruins dug up exceeded the upper limit of the possible Shang Dynasty start time, it was also possible.
If you want to overturn the generation through the oracle bone, you need to determine the owner or its identity through the content on the oracle bone, or through the geological data, determine the approximate year of Pan Geng's migration. There are also Erlitou sites, if you can determine whether the Xia civilization is still the common lord of the Central Plains at that time, after all, the Shang has not been completely erased from the culture, digging up the relics of the Song Dynasty should also have the possibility of digging out the Shang Dynasty documents, then the Xia Dynasty may also have this situation of being destroyed or running out to survive.
In addition, the lineage of the Shang Emperor after Xia may also need to be examined, and in more ancient history, whether the Yan Emperor referred to is a person or a dynasty or a chief tribe? This varies in different contexts. Therefore, it is also very doubtful whether the lineage of the Five Emperors, Xia, and Shang is written in the textbooks now. Is the specific imperial title, such as Taijia, a person, or a small dynasty (imperial lineage) under the shang dynasty such a big dynasty as the Fifth Dynasty was in ancient Egypt? Will there be a few emperors lost in the middle? In fact, the more you go forward, the less you have to pay special attention to the chronology problem, and the chronology needs to refer to the main order.
The significance of the Palermo Stele is that the contents of the king's table are finally no longer limited to the king's name and their order of reign, but also contain events that occurred during the king's reign, the king's family members, and hydrological information about the Nile. The mistake of this big man is to mistakenly think that the Palermo Stone Tablet is the earliest king's table, the continuous recording of the king's name began from the Fifth Dynasty, and the first to fourth dynasties' royal names had to rely on the late king's watch to be backwards, but it was not known that almost every king left self-evident material.
The most important significance of the often used kings is to determine the number of years of the king's reign, because the fragmentation of archaeological materials in the same period makes it difficult to obtain the full number of kings' reign years, and those royal ceremonies are also very arbitrary, so it is necessary to use late documents for correction. Egypt is recognized as a history of faith, largely because of the maturity of the artifacts, and the Narmai palette is clearly a product of a very high civilization. If the Liangzhu Erlitou site can unearth such mature works, then everyone will not question whether it is a dynasty, and now the Erlitou cultural relics are close to the tribal level, so it needs to be written accurately to prove that it belongs to a higher stage.