Hello everyone, I'm Bells~
I don't know how everyone looks at the auxiliary position, maybe different players have different views, some players feel that the auxiliary is very easy to score the position, some players are willing to lose without playing the auxiliary, some players are like bells, the auxiliary is assisted, and other positions, there is nothing strange, how to play how to play.
But there are not many players like Bells in the game, what is the most? The most is the player who does not want to lose, so he does not play the auxiliary, the most is the player who prefers to lose and does not play the auxiliary, it seems that this is two different groups of players, but the bell wants to tell everyone that this is the same group of people.
Why don't many players want to lose, so they can't play Assist?
Assisting this position is more difficult to fly teammates in most segments of the game, not because Bells is biased against assisting, because this is the case. On paper, the ability to fly teammates in every position is equally important, but the truth is biased.
For example, when the rank is low, the auxiliary is unable to take the position of the flying teammate, the auxiliary development is poor, the auxiliary cannot eat the hero in other positions alone, the auxiliary cannot play more than one dozen, more is the auxiliary to open a good group, protect the back row, let the back row output, stand up the vision, let the teammates play more fiercely, but if the teammates themselves are poor in strength, your auxiliary play is useless.
It is precisely because of this that players in many positions just don't want to lose, so they don't play assist, because everyone wants to master the game's wins and losses, so it is often the fifth floor supplementary assist, or everyone does not assist, grab the position and so on.
But have you thought about it, what is the original intention of not assisting? Don't you just don't want to lose, you want to win? If there is really no player who will assist, or if no player is willing to assist, you will assist, if you assist yourself, the winning rate will not be much higher. We don't say that we will definitely win, even if it is a 50% win rate. But everyone does not play assist, grab the position, or in the case of a quarrel, let alone a 50% winning rate, there may be no 20% winning rate.
At first, we didn't want to lose, so we didn't play the auxiliary position, but in order not to play the auxiliary, we reduced the original 50% winning rate to 20%, which is not the opposite of our wishes, is not contrary to our original intention? But many players just don't understand this truth, that is, they do a set of mouths, and they stand up again, as if they are very reasonable, in fact, behavior and thoughts are contradictory.
And in the game, such players, often in order not to assist and deliberately lose, such as no way to choose a hero with their own backhand, you can't assist, many players will randomly choose heroes, to the game will be blind play, such as what to explore the field of vision, protect the back row do not need to count on, take a warrior to take the line, go to play a single-player game, play a bell on the hook, play a mozi even auxiliary outfit does not come out.
In fact, this is a very unnecessary game behavior, since we do not want to lose, so do not want to play auxiliary, but if you are able to play the auxiliary situation, when it is your turn to make up for the position, instead of playing the game as a loss, to increase the difficulty of the game to teammates, otherwise your own behavior and your own ideas are contradictory.
Even the bell can tell everyone very responsibly that unless you are a big god playing trumpet, even if you assist, in fact, the winning rate will not be low, because when the position is no longer very low, the gap between the auxiliary can directly affect the win or loss in many cases, because in fact, every position is very important.
If the auxiliary plays well, protects well, the field of vision stands well, the first hand plays well, the output position, for example, the shooter may only need to know that ordinary attacks have an output of 30% of the output of the field, in fact, there is no need to dislike the auxiliary position. Why is there no good assist in the low and medium segments, not that the auxiliary is not good at scoring, it is that the auxiliary segments that can play slightly will not be low, and the upper score is very fast.