As we all know, our country has a long history and culture, and if you want to understand the history of China, it is a good choice to visit the museum.
Nowadays, it is the era of big language, only learning textbook knowledge can no longer meet the children's learning requirements, so many qualified parents will take their children to punch the museum to increase their children's knowledge and improve their children's cultural literacy.
If parents don't have time, they give this task to some institutions and participate in some activities.
There is such a parent in Hubei, the child is on winter vacation, he reported a winter camp "study" activity to the child, let the child go to see the world, but the result is to cause themselves big trouble.
The parent said that he spent 1,000 yuan to let the child participate in the activity, but unexpectedly, when the child visited the museum, he broke a cultural relics statue worth 1.3 million yuan.
Parents posted surveillance video online, and the two sides are negotiating compensation.
The video triggered a heated discussion among netizens, and some netizens said: Finally know how touching porcelain came about.
This netizen said to everyone that in the antique world, there is a saying of touching porcelain, that is, to put the things that are already broken in a place that is easy to break, put it together, so that people can't see that it has been broken, as long as people touch it lightly, it is easy to fall apart, and those people rely on this blackmail to blackmail people. Later, touching porcelain evolved into many other routines, not limited to the antique world.
The implication is that since cultural relics of such a high value are placed in a place where they are easy to touch, they are obviously suspected of "touching porcelain".
Some netizens also proposed that even if adults pass by, they may stumble and accidentally touch it, why not place protective shields or protective fences and the like? Many netizens have raised this question.
Some netizens also said that this is a private museum, the value of cultural relics is 1.3 million, how did it come about? There must be an authoritative proof of value definition, right?
Parents also feel very depressed, they paid 1,000 yuan to let the children grow insight, how did they rise back to 1.3 million insights?
At a time when netizens were arguing, the relevant people in the museum issued a document clarifying that the museum did not call the police, nor did it put forward the claim that the cultural relics were worth 1.3 million.
So, how did this amount come about?
Looking at the chat history, it was the organization of this winter camp that told parents without authorization.
Fortunately, the parents recorded it, otherwise this matter would not be clear again.
The museum staff also heard the recording, saying that the teachers of the research institution privately told the parents: "You call 100,000 first, and this broken item is worth 1.3 million." ”
But the museum side also knew this value when it arrived at the police station...
In the process of communication, parents and museum parties are communicating through research institutions, and in the face of broken cultural relics, it is not only parents who are confused, but also the museum curator.
It was the research institution that told the museum that "parents were frightened and did not want to come (communicate)", but the museum saw that it was not like this, and the museum said that after the child broke the cultural relics, he admitted his mistake to himself at the first time, afraid that he would affect his parents. When meeting the parents of the children, the parents also apologized to themselves for the first time.
The child's father also said to the child: "Don't provoke, don't run away from the problem!" Now it is not a question of money, it is our country that has since lost a complete cultural relic, and this loss is the largest and immeasurable. ”
I have to say that the child's timely attitude of admitting mistakes is the result of parental education, and the parents' three views are still very positive.
The museum did not say that this cultural relic is a substitute, and their first reaction to the shattering of the cultural relics is "I don't know if it can be repaired", which is most likely genuine.
If that's the case, it's really unfortunate. The lesson is great for all parties.
The matter is still under negotiation, but it is certain that all parties will bear the corresponding losses. However, no matter what, it cannot make up for the damage of a cultural relic and the loss of the historical value of the cultural relic.
"Don't move other people's things casually", this sentence I heard since I was a child, I think, is still a sentence that many parents say to their children.
We can't say that the child is not to blame for this, the child's fault in this matter is obvious, and the child himself admits to the mistake.
What I want to say is that the child's uncontrollable nature is very strong, and many of the rules that we adults can simply understand and follow are still relatively weak in the presence of the child. When children are curious and playful, it is easier for them to leave these rules behind.
Therefore, what adults have to do is not only to guide and educate children, but also to "guard" against children.
Recently, I also saw one thing, almost the New Year, a grandmother was busy for two days to prepare a lot of bean paste, after wrapping, covered "let the face wake up for a while", but also with their two grandchildren stressed many times, there are buns, do not press.
The result?
The two children played crazy, completely forgot that there was a bun under the quilt, not only pressed but also rolled around, all the bean paste bags survived, all flattened!
The two children were so frightened that they ran to their aunt's house and hid for two days.
Are you saying that the child doesn't know he's wrong?
They know, but the characteristics of the child's brain development determine that some behaviors, they themselves are also uncontrollable.
Instead of blaming children afterwards, punishing children, and calling them "bear children", it is better to take "precautionary" measures in advance.
The other is about this kind of seminar, looking at the situation of tripartite communication, the seminar has an unshirkable responsibility in this incident, not only did not take good care of the child, but also shirked its own responsibility, misleading the parties.
How to deal with it in the end, we don't know, but it is clear that the teacher of this study class is not doing anything.
When parents choose a seminar, they still have to polish their eyes and sign a good agreement.
What if this incident not only touched the cultural relics but also accidentally injured himself?
I hope that this incident will sound an alarm bell for everyone: the museum should do a better job of protective measures; parents should educate their children; children should discipline their hands and feet; research institutions should not only think about making money, but also look after children in the process and take responsibility for themselves.
—Thanks for reading—