Although the national football team had changed coach to Li Xiaopeng in the second match against Japan in the round of 12, it still lost to the Japanese team again 0-2.
In fact, from the perspective of the process, scenes and effects of the game, this is basically the same as li tie's first 0-1 match against Japan: it is all desperate! - So much so that commentator Huang Jianxiang commented: Chinese football has completely lost, and there is no hope for the next 30 years!
Although Li Xiaopeng was fully responsible after the game, in fact, fans and the media began to stop besieging the head coach, and everyone reached a big consensus, that is, Chinese football lost in a comprehensive way, losing to Japanese football in all aspects: youth training, players, liuyang, coaches... I lost everything and lost all my bottoms.
Why is there no effect of "changing the coach like changing the knife", but "changing the soup without changing the medicine"? Obviously, our football is lagging behind from beginning to end - the Japanese team only needs foreign players to form a three-set squad, what hope do we have to win? Therefore, it is difficult to blame the former Li Tie, the national football coach, or the later Li Xiaopeng.
However, people may also remember some of Li Tie's golden sayings about Chinese coaches not being bad – such as:
Li Tie said: "I want to ask the local coach what's wrong? Are our achievements really worse than those of foreign teachers? We work very hard, if we all look down on ourselves and look down on Chinese, then is there any hope for Chinese football? ”
And after Li Tie lost to the Japanese team in the first game, he threw out a sentence: "Only Chinese can serve as the national football coach, and only Chinese can do this well" - but the result is that whether it is Li Tie, Li Xiaopeng, or other local managers, it is difficult to be qualified for the position of national football coach.
Moreover, you know, before the second game of the Japanese team, the national football team will gather the best local young marshals in the national team - in addition to Li Xiaopeng, there are Zhao Junzhe, Li Jinyu, Sun Jihai, Zheng Zhi, Sun Xiang, Shao Jiayi, etc., but what is the effect?
If you push forward and look at the achievements of the local coach of the national football team, Li Tie's statement that "the local coach is not worse than the foreign coach", in terms of facts and results, how can it be proved that it can be established?
In the last round of 12 matches, Lippi took over Gao Hongbo, who only accumulated 1 point in 4 games, and he scored 11 points in 6 games; and Li Tie only scored 5 points in the first 6 games of the round of 12 with the help of naturalized players; and then think of the only time the Chinese men's football team rushed into the World Cup, which is also the credit of foreign coach Milu!
Looking at the basic skills and level of national football players now, in fact, we should understand a truth: or honestly admit that Chinese football is lagging behind in an all-round way! ——Among them, we must admit that there is a huge gap between all Chinese local coaches like Li Tie and Li Xiaopeng!
With these local coaches, whether it is leading the youth training, or leading the professional team or the national team, with their own level and ability, the poor level and ability will also transmit generation after generation, then it can only be like Huang Jianxiang said: Chinese football in the next 30 years can not have hope!
Therefore, stop clinging to the fallacy of "Chinese local coaches are not worse than foreign teachers" for different purposes and ideas like Li Tie! If Chinese football wants to make fundamental progress, it is necessary to use the best foreign coaches as much as possible from youth coaches, to professional coaches, as well as national teams at all levels, so as to scrape the bones and heal the wounds, and to make Chinese football fundamentally better! 【Original Review: Yu said that hugh】