The remake of the farce of "Harry Potter" shows the absurdity of Hollywood's "political correctness"
No one expected that a farce would be a serial.
At the end of "Harry Potter 20th Anniversary", the fangs of capital came out, and it was still very decisive and fast.
The filmmakers directly announced that they would launch a remake of Harry Potter and would be filmed into a series of "Awakening" web series.
Among them, the actors will also be "selected".
Not only will there be a large number of transgender actors on the scene, but the father of the protagonist Harry Potter will not be played by a white man.
Even the trio in the original: "Harry Potter" Daniel, "Hermione" Emma Watson, and "Ron" Rupert will not appear in the new game.
Such an absolutely "correct" TV series will be used to address the friction and controversy between JK Rowling and minorities by the original author.
Filming of the series will begin around June, and it is currently in the process of recruiting actors.
As soon as this news came out, it caused heated discussion and even controversy.
Most people in Hollywood are looking forward to this new game, because it means that their battle has been won, and JK Rowling's old has fallen behind.
In a "politically correct" place, JK Rowling still wants to be "alone"? Do you really think you're great, do you really think you're tall?
Those who do not support the show think that a father who is not white how to give birth to a white son? Is this an allusion to whether the old king of Europe is white? Or mock the black brothers for their eagerness to take over?
Also, how did a transgender person live as a couple and get pregnant and give birth to Harry Potter?
If Snape knew that Lily was a transgender person, would snape still be "always" before he could dance with him to play the "Mandarin Duck Butterfly Sword"?
The source of the controversy is actually from JK Rowling's "inappropriate remarks" and the "right" wind that Hollywood has blown in recent years.
The contradiction between the two lies in the perception of "transgender people".
The so-called "transgender person" is a person who repeatedly jumps in the gender, that is, a man, if he subjectively thinks that he is a girl, then he (she) can go to the women's toilet.
This view seems very magical, even illogical.
However, in Hollywood's view, there is nothing wrong with this concept, even correct, after all, this is the freedom of others.
Wearing women's clothes can no longer satisfy their (their) psychological self-(change) by (state), go to the women's toilet, into a women's bathroom what's wrong?
JK Rowling believes that such a concept will lead to the erosion of the rights and interests of "real women".
Because no one knows, will there be some "brotherly" people, after "on the head", to do something "tribute" to India.
JK Rowling thought that she was very objective and rational, but she did not expect that her words were opposed by many people as soon as she finished speaking.
The first is the direct statement of the Harry Potter Triumvirate, saying that JK Rowling's words are somewhat ill-considered and should respect the gender freedom of "transgender people".
Then there are the two major "Harry Potter" fan sites that directly "fired" JK Rowling, not acknowledging her relationship with Harry Potter.
Even the 20th anniversary of Harry Potter did not invite JK Rowling to the scene.
And the anniversary documentary "Back to Hogwarts" is even more self-deceptive, making up for it with JK Rowling's previous archival film.
After the 20th anniversary, no one expected that the fangs of capital would directly shine out.
Why is Capital so eager to separate Harry Potter from JK Rowling?
In the final analysis, it is the scourge of interests.
Harry Potter is a gold mine, and its suction ability can be said to be obvious to all.
Eight movies alone have grossed $78 billion worldwide, not to mention the rights to peripherals, novels, and so on.
And JK Rowling also relied on this novel, from an embarrassing single mother to once become the world's richest writer.
The gold-sucking ability of Harry Potter is evident, and capital naturally wants to firmly control this gold mine.
However, between the gold mine and the capital, it is JK Rowling.
JK Rowling attaches great importance to the copyright in her hand, and has her own requirements for the adaptation of the work.
When Warner first filmed Harry Potter, JK Rowling demanded that the actors must be all British, and that they should be filmed strictly according to the British shooting system.
And there are strict requirements for all aspects of the film, which can be said to be "slow work and fine work".
But for capital, slow work is a small work, but it cannot come to fast money.
Therefore, they are all looking at JK Rowling, until JK Rowling revealed a huge flaw, and capital rushed up, rapidly expanding JK Rowling's remarks.
Thus, there is the absurd farce of separating the author from the work.
It can only be said that the Hollywood wind is "very correct" and capital is also "smart".