Comprehensively compiled from the WeChat public accounts "Global Times", "Patch a Knife", "Coldplay Lab" Weibo @ Observer Network, @ Zhao Lijian personal Weibo, netizen comments, etc
Recently, the epidemic situation in Europe and the United States has surged again under the attack of "Omicron", and many countries have repeatedly refreshed the record in a single day.
However, the Western media, which claim to be "fair and objective", have at this time targeted China's epidemic prevention policy and opened the "encircled china to save the West" model in an attempt to save face for the unbearable epidemic prevention work of European and American countries. Among them, the New York Times recently published an article smearing China's fight against the epidemic, and its language was so vicious that even many foreign netizens exclaimed "crazy".
The article shamelessly claims that the sacrifices that every Chinese make for the early end of the epidemic and the early rejuvenation of society is a "banal evil", which was originally a concept proposed by the German philosopher Hannah Arendt when describing Nazi Germany. That is to say, in the New York Times article, the overwhelming majority of Chinese people's support for China's epidemic prevention policy was smeared as the support of Germans for the massacre of Jews during Nazi Germany.
What is even more unexpected is that what has written such an anti-China "xiongwen" is a yellow-skinned face familiar to the Chinese people. She is Yuan Li, a Chinese reporter for The New York Times.
The far right is Yuan Li
According to public information, Yuan Li was born in China, worked in a domestic media, and then defected to the American media, working for the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. After joining The New York Times in 2018, Yuan Li made a big fuss about various anti-China issues, writing a large number of reports that slandered and maliciously attacked China.
As for what mentality and purpose Yuan Li made these moves, we don't know. However, what we do know is that although Yuan Li is so "conscientious" in her anti-China cause, this malicious article has flipped over from foreign netizens, and the scolding in the comment area is endless.
The anti-China "eloquent article" commented that the article, which compared China's life-saving epidemic prevention policy to the massacre of Jews, was the "craziest" text she had ever read, and even blatantly incited the extreme racist trend of "yellow peril" (that is, the view that had once been popular in Western society to incite hostility and xenophobia by degrading and demonizing yellow people, including Chinese).
Some foreign netizens ridiculed: "If I become China's 'five cents' (patriotic and socialist), it must be disgusted by the New York Times." ”
What is sad is that Yuan Li is not the only "hate party" that grew up in China, but turned to the Western media, took advantage of its own language and culture, and more brazenly engaged in anti-China propaganda. Xu Xiuzhong, a writer for the New York Times who "taught the same door" as Yuan Li, is also an "expert" who spread rumors and smeared China.
According to reports, Xu Xiuzhong was born in Jiayuguan, Gansu, China in 1994 to a good family. She entered a well-known university in China through independent admissions channels, and then moved to Australia, where she worked for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the New York Times. Due to his fake news reports such as smearing patriotic masses and supporting rioters in Hong Kong, his "outstanding" business ability was photographed by the infamous Australian Institute for Strategic Studies (ASPI), and Xu Xiuzhong naturally joined the institute and went further and further down the anti-China road.
Xu Xiuzhong's name entered everyone's field of vision because she became the initiator of the "Xinjiang Cotton" incident in 2021. After Xu Xiuzhong joined ASPI, he fabricated a "Xinjiang Human Rights Report." The report falsely claims that between 2017 and 2019, at least 80,000 Uighur compatriots were forcibly transferred to factories in the interior to work, a "forced labor" targeted by the Chinese government against the Uighurs. Since then, some Western countries have used this fabricated report as so-called "evidence" to justify the boycott of cotton in Xinjiang.
However, Xu Xiuzhong's hard-working anti-China performance did not exchange her for a bright and smooth road overseas. In recent years, in order to compete for fame and funding, anti-China elements in Western countries have also begun to "draw in the inner volume", and their remarks have become more and more outrageous, competing with each other against intelligence and lower limits.
And Xu Xiu's clown-like behavior of pleasing Westerners through racial self-hatred has also been unanimously spurned by his compatriots.
The "Hate National Party" who is in a nest with Yuan Li and Xu Xiuzhong, as well as the "same door master sister" and Xiao Muyi of the visual investigation team of the New York Times.
According to public information on the Internet, Xiao Muyi was born in Wuhan, graduated from a university majoring in international journalism in 2013, worked as a photojournalist in a domestic media, and later worked for Reuters and the "China GinsengGuan". In 2020, Xiao Muyi officially joined the visual investigation team of the New York Times as a newcomer reporter.
After joining The New York Times, Xiao Muyi concocted a series of reports that distorted the mainland's new crown fight against the epidemic. "The Chinese government covers up the epidemic", "the people do not trust the government", "the government cracks down on 'whistleblowers'", "the epidemic is China's Chernobyl"... Xiao Muyi's report caters to the dark imagination of Western anti-China forces about the epidemic in China.
Like "sister-in-law" Xu Xiuzhong, Xiao Muyi also extended the black hand of anti-China propaganda to Xinjiang on the mainland. In one report, she "imaginatively" claimed that masks made in China came from "forced labor" in Xinjiang.
Why did this group of "hate the Kuomintang" grow up in China and receive a good education, but in the end they confessed to being thieves and fathers, and became increasingly mad on the road of opposing China?
There is a psychological term, "convert fanaticism," which might explain their bizarre behavior. This group of people longs to be accommodated by the Western world, but in the face of the discrimination, slander and prejudice suffered by China, they not only dare not choose to fight back, but also insult the motherland and compatriots as a "letter of submission" to Western society, trying to show more "Western" and more anti-China than Westerners, hoping that the West will recognize their "Geng Geng loyalty".
The hysterical performance of the "hate the nationalist party" is not only not welcomed by Westerners, but also despised by the Chinese people. The dynamic zero-zero epidemic prevention measures of our country's "people first" and the stability and prosperity of the western frontier are the best responses to this group of beam-jumping clowns.
Source: Central Committee of the Communist Youth League