Is the inheritance of a nation important by blood or culture?

When many people analyze a nation, they always ask questions like headlines. In fact, combined with the facts, it is not difficult to find an answer to this question.

For example, France is blackening, the United States is being greened in Latin America, and Europe is greening, but if they have more than one choice, they will not go to this step today, one is the international situation and the domestic environment, and the other is that the white left feminist ideology brings its own nation into the pit.

If they have such a civilization: a population of more than one billion, a land area of several million square kilometers, other ethnic minorities and the subject ethnic group more or less have a complex mixed marriage, the bloodline has long been united, the culture and the subject of the ethnic group are intermingled, except for a few regional customs are basically not much different, and even the written language is inextricably linked to the language of the subject nation.

If they had this choice, they would never have come to this step today, but today's big countries in the East have obviously gone through thousands of years to have such a good situation today, and the Chinese civilization has a basic plate and a circle of Chinese civilization that is incomparably envied by other countries, and there are still people who take their failed theories and apply them to China in a vain attempt to deny the role of the main nation. It attempts to deny the established fact that China's multi-ethnic common ancestors and multi-ethnic genes are consistent in origin.

But if you look at the recent archaeological discoveries and genetic surveys, you can know that China is not only Han, but most of the ethnic minorities have paternal genes derived from the three major paternal genes of the three major basins of the Yellow River, the Yangtze River and the Pearl River. Archaeological relics in many places prove that cultural fusion occurred in various parts of China five thousand years ago. Chinese civilization is a civilization with a high degree of unity of blood and culture, which is unique to the earth and can be called a miracle.

Such an excellent civilization and genes are not well inherited and developed, but the logical theory of grafting the West is used in Chinese. The problem is also in the inversion of primary and secondary, who is the main body? Who is the substitute? Who fits into whom? Who accepts whom? Is black integrated into Chinese civilization? Or is the Anglo-Saxon bandit law of the jungle integrated into Chinese civilization? Seeing that Africa has not made any progress for thousands of years? Can't we see that Onsa's colonialism is harming all mankind, and that a whole host of legacy problems still plague people in many countries and regions?

It must be a family first, and then they must be qualified to talk about cultural integration with each other, if they are not a family in the first place, the so-called cultural exchange is only superficial. If you don't believe me, look at the negative textbooks in other parts of the world:

The Mayflower came to the land of North America, and the local natives warmly welcomed the fallen whites as guests from afar, gave them food and seeds, and taught them how to survive in North America. But then the reward was that these Western colonists used their guns to create slaughters to make the Indians genocide, was it because the Indians were not enthusiastic enough and did not want to integrate?

How long has it been since then? Less than two hundred years, and only a few generations before counting. Nazi Germany massacred Jews in World War II, Ukrainians slaughtered Poles on a large scale in 1943, the Japanese army carried out genocide and cultural extermination of Chinese civilians during the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, and 731 made inhumane experiments with Chinese.

Is it that we are not enthusiastic, kind, not tolerant, and do not want to absorb the advantages of merging with other civilizations? From this shocking historical event, we draw a lesson: cultural integration has always been the fusion of civilization and civilization, if the other party's animal nature has not been shed, then cut off their beast claws and pull out their sharp teeth, so that their faded animal nature can be restored to humanity. On this basis, we can talk about the exchange and integration of cultures, otherwise we are serving the tiger by example!

Don't be naïve enough to think that the Onza bandits will tolerate compassion for weak and small peoples like the Chinese civilization, and use cultural identity and blood marriage to slowly close the distance between the two ethnic groups, and eventually become a family, this time can be hundreds of years, or even thousands of years. Palestinians are going through the process of being driven away from their homes and being exterminated! This is what is happening under the same sky at the same time.

Only the Chinese civilization can tolerate compassion and eclecticism with other ethnic cultures. Blue Star is the only one!

Who to integrate with is also an important issue, and integration is for the Chinese nation to be more excellent. Here we have to consider a problem, African genes have not even gone out of the birthplace of human beings, let alone experienced the cruel Xiaoice river cycle multiple screening, nor experienced large-scale collaborative war-torn labor education and other activities to develop intelligence. What do we get by merging with them? Get an average IQ drop of a few dozen points?

Fusion with the White Onsars, although their genes have undergone many screenings like ours, but their Onsar bandit culture has not faded, do we learn from them to engage in bandit logic colonization system? Either way is not the way we should go.

Now I suspect that some people deliberately want to stir up dissension between national feelings and disintegrate Chinese civilization in basic logic.

One sentence can be summed up: its heart is reprehensible!