laitimes
return

The movie "Minority Report" has a sense of another drowning incident, which triggered another discussion, the data analysis of the person who called the prophet's precognitive influence after the "criminal" was dealt with, called the memory image, and then deleted them, which later proved not to be a mistake, but a deliberate manipulation of Rama, but the final murder still happened, which should be an inevitable law of the development of things, that person is doomed to die, even if he was protected from crime in advance, he still drowned in the same way. As the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, "Man cannot step into the same river twice," dialectics tells us that change is absolute, invariance is relative, that things are flowing, that everything is changing, that it is inevitable.

In a state of increasing social development and progress, most people no longer face the problem of hunger, and with it all kinds of criminal acts. The movie Minorities Report is about the use of the most advanced and "perfect" crime defense system in 2054. Washington D.C. Because of this system, all foreseeable murderers are eliminated before the crime occurs, thus avoiding some of the tragedies that would have occurred. Among them, the male protagonist John, who lost his son 6 years ago and experienced major trauma. Anderton has invested a great deal of passion in the system, and he has great confidence in the system and is eager to help more people avoid disasters. Through this system, he collects any hidden and low-key evidence of a crime that can be charged, grasps the time, place or details of the crime, and brings the "prisoner" to justice before the crime occurs, until he himself becomes the number one suspect. He began to be suspicious of the system, trying to avoid appearing at the scene of the crime, trying to find the truth of the matter, but the ensuing events made the case develop in the direction of foreknowledge, he killed people when he knew that he would not kill people, and the crime rate fell for the first time in Colombia, where he knew that he was prevented from killing. Later, the truth finally emerged, the predictions of the three prophets who could predict criminal acts were actually inconsistent, and some people, in order to hide the imperfections of the system, transformed the system into a minority that obeyed the majority, rather than a minority with a higher accuracy rate, of course, the designer quietly hid the minority report in the prophet's body. Finally, through a series of investigations and analysis, everyone who learned the truth was due to Rama's manipulation. This is a thought-provoking science fiction film, but also a warning of the relationship between artificial intelligence on the ethics of engineering and brain science.

The movie "Minority Report" has a sense of another drowning incident, which triggered another discussion, the data analysis of the person who called the prophet's precognitive influence after the "criminal" was dealt with, called the memory image, and then deleted them, which later proved not to be a mistake, but a deliberate manipulation of Rama, but the final murder still happened, which should be an inevitable law of the development of things, that person is doomed to die, even if he was protected from crime in advance, he still drowned in the same way. As the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, "Man cannot step into the same river twice," dialectics tells us that change is absolute, invariance is relative, that things are flowing, that everything is changing, that it is inevitable.

Engineering Ethics Analysis:

The first thing that catches our eye in the film is the title "Minority". As we all know, "the minority obeys the majority" is a solution to a problem that has never been solved; however, there is another way of saying that "the truth is often in the hands of the 'minority'", this film deals with the minority view, abandoning subjective cognition, objectively speaking, the minority prophets tend to be more accurate, we can solve the problem with one opinion, but we can also keep our own opinion, it is important to respect the opinions of others, even if they are minorities. In our lives, too, many people cannot accept the view that "the other party is different from me", and the Analects say: Gentlemen are harmonious but different, perhaps this is the source of many contradictions.

The movie "Minority Report" has a sense of another drowning incident, which triggered another discussion, the data analysis of the person who called the prophet's precognitive influence after the "criminal" was dealt with, called the memory image, and then deleted them, which later proved not to be a mistake, but a deliberate manipulation of Rama, but the final murder still happened, which should be an inevitable law of the development of things, that person is doomed to die, even if he was protected from crime in advance, he still drowned in the same way. As the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, "Man cannot step into the same river twice," dialectics tells us that change is absolute, invariance is relative, that things are flowing, that everything is changing, that it is inevitable.

The first case is that the prophet foresaw a double murder caused by an affair, and the male protagonist successfully prevented the murder. He was proud of this, strangling others in the cradle before they had a criminal consciousness and did not take action, and two living lives were easily saved. However, at the legal level, the so-called criminals are not illegal, but only an "inevitable possibility of crime". Under the double standards of morality and law, is the approach of this offender prevention organization reasonable? To take a simple example, if someone else borrows your money in the future and you ask someone to pay off their future debt now, does that create a reversal between "borrowing" and "repaying", and in terms of ethics and chronological order, which party is indebted to human feelings?

The movie "Minority Report" has a sense of another drowning incident, which triggered another discussion, the data analysis of the person who called the prophet's precognitive influence after the "criminal" was dealt with, called the memory image, and then deleted them, which later proved not to be a mistake, but a deliberate manipulation of Rama, but the final murder still happened, which should be an inevitable law of the development of things, that person is doomed to die, even if he was protected from crime in advance, he still drowned in the same way. As the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, "Man cannot step into the same river twice," dialectics tells us that change is absolute, invariance is relative, that things are flowing, that everything is changing, that it is inevitable.

<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="5" > another drowning incident, which triggered another discussion, the data analysis of the prophet's precognitive influence after the "criminal" was processed, called the memory image, and then deleted them, which was later proved not to be a mistaken deletion, but a deliberate manipulation of Rama, but the final murder still happened, which should be an inevitable law of the development of things, that person is doomed to die, Even though crime prevention protection was given to him in advance, he drowned in the same way. As the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, "Man cannot step into the same river twice," dialectics tells us that change is absolute, invariance is relative, that things are flowing, that everything is changing, that it is inevitable. </h1>

The movie "Minority Report" has a sense of another drowning incident, which triggered another discussion, the data analysis of the person who called the prophet's precognitive influence after the "criminal" was dealt with, called the memory image, and then deleted them, which later proved not to be a mistake, but a deliberate manipulation of Rama, but the final murder still happened, which should be an inevitable law of the development of things, that person is doomed to die, even if he was protected from crime in advance, he still drowned in the same way. As the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, "Man cannot step into the same river twice," dialectics tells us that change is absolute, invariance is relative, that things are flowing, that everything is changing, that it is inevitable.

The main line of the film is that the male protagonist has become the number one suspect from the leader of the crime prevention team, the picture in which he killed a man he did not know at all, using the 36 hours before the crime, he fled all the way, all the way to find the truth, and gradually found the loopholes in the system, the so-called artificial intelligence is ultimately unable to replace people, once the artificial intelligence that humans completely rely on is wrong, the consequences are unimaginable, and what we need more is the use of its reason.

The movie "Minority Report" has a sense of another drowning incident, which triggered another discussion, the data analysis of the person who called the prophet's precognitive influence after the "criminal" was dealt with, called the memory image, and then deleted them, which later proved not to be a mistake, but a deliberate manipulation of Rama, but the final murder still happened, which should be an inevitable law of the development of things, that person is doomed to die, even if he was protected from crime in advance, he still drowned in the same way. As the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, "Man cannot step into the same river twice," dialectics tells us that change is absolute, invariance is relative, that things are flowing, that everything is changing, that it is inevitable.

Throughout the film is the foreknowledge of the three prophets, but is the future a foregone conclusion? If so, what is the point of crime prevention? If the future is uncertain, then we can change the future through the present, but did the prophet foresee the future? Dr. said: What is needed is not for them to foresee the future, but to heal them, in this three-dimensional space, why can their brains cross the dimension of time?

The movie "Minority Report" has a sense of another drowning incident, which triggered another discussion, the data analysis of the person who called the prophet's precognitive influence after the "criminal" was dealt with, called the memory image, and then deleted them, which later proved not to be a mistake, but a deliberate manipulation of Rama, but the final murder still happened, which should be an inevitable law of the development of things, that person is doomed to die, even if he was protected from crime in advance, he still drowned in the same way. As the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, "Man cannot step into the same river twice," dialectics tells us that change is absolute, invariance is relative, that things are flowing, that everything is changing, that it is inevitable.

Whether it is the male protagonist killing, or the minority report, or John's self-righteous search for the truth, all of them are Rama's calculations and monitoring throughout the process, a person who has nothing to do with himself, involved in his entire life, when the development of science and technology is used by some people who are plotting against him, in which direction will things develop?

The movie "Minority Report" has a sense of another drowning incident, which triggered another discussion, the data analysis of the person who called the prophet's precognitive influence after the "criminal" was dealt with, called the memory image, and then deleted them, which later proved not to be a mistake, but a deliberate manipulation of Rama, but the final murder still happened, which should be an inevitable law of the development of things, that person is doomed to die, even if he was protected from crime in advance, he still drowned in the same way. As the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, "Man cannot step into the same river twice," dialectics tells us that change is absolute, invariance is relative, that things are flowing, that everything is changing, that it is inevitable.

revelation:

Although the film is only more than two hours, there are still many revelations and warnings for us, that sentence: "Why arrest me, I did nothing." There was also the question of the newly arrived Federal Commissioner about the whereabouts of the wooden ball. Is it right to arrest a person who has not committed a crime through the theory of guilt and punish him? Or is it right to know that the tragedy has happened, to look at it coldly and not to stop it, until the life is gone, and then punish the de facto prisoner? The "prophets" with special talents were used by Rama to arrest many so-called "criminals", and the "innocent" prophets were really innocent? Just as existence is reasonable, is the future foreseen by the prophet an inevitable necessity or a known possibility? Is the process different, or does it produce inevitable results? The same process may not produce the same results! In the end, different processes and different results lead to the inevitable result, is the present now the original future? Correctness is also relative, one yin and one yang, and the minority with higher accuracy rate is also the participant in the outcome of things. The development of science and technology will interact with legal morality and human ethics, which reveals human nature and reveals the essence of the world. In short, there are many possibilities in the future, but there is only one, all depending on the choice of the present, we do not need to worry about the sky, just live in the present.

The movie "Minority Report" has a sense of another drowning incident, which triggered another discussion, the data analysis of the person who called the prophet's precognitive influence after the "criminal" was dealt with, called the memory image, and then deleted them, which later proved not to be a mistake, but a deliberate manipulation of Rama, but the final murder still happened, which should be an inevitable law of the development of things, that person is doomed to die, even if he was protected from crime in advance, he still drowned in the same way. As the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, "Man cannot step into the same river twice," dialectics tells us that change is absolute, invariance is relative, that things are flowing, that everything is changing, that it is inevitable.
Minority reporting
Previous: Portrait of a Burning Woman is swept away by reason, and individuality maintains order
Next: Just by looking at the scale and taboos, we underestimate the portrait of the burning woman in the most beautiful new film of the year, "Portrait of a Burning Woman"

Read on