Paper can't cover the fire after all! The inside story of Britain's ban on Huawei was uncovered, exposing the ugly face of the United States

The British government has banned China's Huawei 5G equipment and services on the grounds of so-called national security issues. But discerning people know that London is under pressure from the United States, which is the main reason why it has to give up using Huawei equipment and services. Although such speculation has been made by the media before, it has not been recognized by London. But the paper could not contain the fire after all, and now someone has finally stepped forward to confirm the speculation of the outside world.

According to the Global Times, on the 10th local time, former British Commerce Minister Cable broke the news that the British government's decision to ban Huawei's 5G equipment and services has nothing to do with "national security", but is forced by the pressure of the United States, because "the United States told the United Kingdom that it should do this." In addition, Cable also "fought against the grievances" of Huawei: during his tenure as Business Secretary, British security and intelligence services repeatedly assured that the use of Huawei services would not pose a risk to the country.

In response, a Spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry said that this once again confirmed the reasons for the so-called "national security" and "5G technology risks", but it was just a cover used by the United States to suppress China's high-end technology companies. The so-called "clean network" initiative launched by the United States is actually synonymous with "coercive diplomacy". The bullying behavior of the United States is bound to be met with increasingly widespread resistance and opposition from the international community.

The United States suppresses high-tech enterprises in other countries, monopolizes the international high-tech product market, and creates huge profits for its own technology giants, but this is only part of its intention. More importantly, the United States uses diplomatic coercion to force allies and partners to use high-tech U.S. products, such as communications network equipment, in order to obtain sensitive intelligence from other countries. The "Prism Gate" incident, which has been making a lot of noise in the international community, is the "masterpiece" of the United States' tao allies.

Since the end of the Cold War, in order to ensure its dominant position in the field of high technology, the United States has never stopped suppressing the science and technology enterprises of other countries. The targets of the United States' suppression include the United States' own allies, and a large number of Japanese and European high-tech enterprises, such as Toshiba and Alstom, have been maimed by the United States by similar means.

Nowadays, while the United States is suppressing China's Huawei, South Korea's Samsung and Taiwan Province's TSMC are also included in the list of US suppression. Obviously, in order to monopolize the international market for high-tech products, as well as to control the economic and foreign policies of its allies and partners, the United States' diplomatic coercion has reached the point of madness.

Britain is the "staunchest ally" of the United States, and its former senior officials are still dissatisfied with the bullying methods adopted by the United States and interfered in Britain's internal affairs, let alone other countries. This is one of the main reasons why the United States' appeal to its allies is becoming weaker and weaker in its efforts to contain China.

Cable publicly unveiled the inside story of britain's ban on Huawei equipment, so that the world can further see the ugly face of the United States' "coercive diplomacy", which is equivalent to slapping the United States. Cable's move should not be a personal whim, but more like a change in the attitude of the British government on the Huawei issue. After all, giving up cooperation with a safe and reliable partner in favor of seeking cooperation with a partner with a bad record is something that even a sane government would not want to do.

In fact, this is just a microcosm of the countries around the world's resistance to US coercive diplomacy. Prior to this, a number of telecom operators in the European Union have long continued to cooperate with China's Huawei in spite of the opposition of the United States. The UAE in the Middle East is even more tough, even at the expense of suspending arms purchase negotiations with the United States and insisting on cooperation projects with China's Huawei.

As more U.S. pressures on other countries to ban the equipment of Chinese technology companies are unveiled, countries around the world can more clearly see the sinister intentions of the United States to suppress high-tech enterprises in other countries, and they are no longer willing to be fooled by the United States. This will lead to the United States' attempts to maintain its own advantage in high-end technology by suppressing high-tech companies in other countries, which is becoming increasingly unsustainable.

It can be seen that from the day Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou returned home safely, it means that the US crackdown on China's high-tech enterprises has failed. The tenacity and ability of Chinese technology companies backed by powerful countries have actually put an end to the United States' crackdown on high-tech enterprises in other countries.